Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00820v1
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 17:41:11 GMT
- Title: Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate
- Abstract summary: We show that a conventional answer flip rate conflates three mechanisms: spontaneous instability, stance-induced conformity, and reasoning-induced persuasion.<n>Our three-source decomposition framework isolates each through controlled counterfactual conditions.
- Score: 5.650336594658653
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multi-agent debate (MAD) is a promising strategy for improving LLM reasoning, but when agents converge on a shared answer, it is unclear whether that convergence reflects genuine deliberation or social compliance. We show that the conventional answer flip rate conflates three distinct mechanisms: spontaneous instability, stance-induced conformity, and reasoning-induced persuasion. Our three-source decomposition framework isolates each through controlled counterfactual conditions. In the primary MMLU-Pro setting, 37% of agent-question observations change under self-reflection alone, while robustness tests show substantial model-dependent instability across GPQA-Diamond and three model families; strict conformity is 29% in the primary setting and remains predominantly harmful across model replications (57-77% correct-to-wrong). A controlled information-gradient experiment reveals that even vacuous reasoning is associated with 20-39% error adoption among resistant agents, with reasoning-like presentation carrying substantial persuasive weight. Harmful conformity can be predicted from Round 0 features (AUC = 0.79), and risk-targeted intervention reduces it by 13.6 percentage points (p < 0.001). However, without correctness labels or self-reflection controls, reducing peer adoption does not improve accuracy, because harmful and beneficial influence cannot be distinguished.
Related papers
- Robust for the Wrong Reasons: The Representational Geometry of LLM Robustness to Science Skepticism [3.993449663756884]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly consulted on contested scientific questions.<n>We show that models show three distinct policies under the same skeptical pressure.<n>We synthesize these into a four-way taxonomy separating active from accidental robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-02T09:40:52Z) - Evaluation Awareness Is Not One Capability: Evidence from Open Language Models [1.758143872501506]
Safety benchmarks assume that test-condition behavior predicts deployment behavior, an assumption that fails if models detect evaluation cues and adapt.<n>This opens a gap between benchmark performance and deployment behavior.<n>We characterize this evaluation awareness through eight experiments across 37 open-weight models and seven families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-22T16:48:43Z) - Game-Theoretic Multi-Agent Control for Robust Contextual Reasoning in LLMs [6.335875360476155]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-turn interactions maintain evolving context rather than generating isolated responses.<n>We introduce the Game-Theoretic Secure Model Context Protocol (GT-MCP), a controller-driven multi-agent method that treats context management as a closed-loop dynamical process.<n>When instability is detected, a rollback-based self-healing mechanism restores the validated context and prevents unsupported fragments from propagating.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T02:18:44Z) - Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z) - From Debate to Decision: Conformal Social Choice for Safe Multi-Agent Deliberation [12.294365308421606]
We introduce Conformal Social Choice, a post-hoc decision layer that converts debate outputs into calibrated act-versus-escalate decisions.<n>A hierarchical action policy maps singleton sets to autonomous action and larger sets to human escalation.<n>Because the layer refuses to act on cases where debate is confidently wrong, the remaining conformal singletons reach 90.0--96.8% accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T00:15:20Z) - Evaluating Evidence Grounding Under User Pressure in Instruction-Tuned Language Models [6.431677598656395]
In contested domains, instruction-tuned language models must balance user-alignment pressures against faithfulness to the in-context evidence.<n>We conduct fine-grained ablations over evidence composition and uncertainty cues across 19 instruction-tuned models spanning 0.27B to 32B parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-20T17:38:23Z) - Semantic Invariance in Agentic AI [2.7821684674538347]
Large Language Models increasingly serve as autonomous reasoning agents in decision support, scientific problem-solving, and multi-agent coordination systems.<n> deploying LLM agents in consequential applications requires assurance that their reasoning remains stable under semantically equivalent input variations.<n>Standard benchmark evaluations, which assess accuracy on fixed, canonical problem formulations, fail to capture this critical reliability dimension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T17:08:44Z) - BadCLIP++: Stealthy and Persistent Backdoors in Multimodal Contrastive Learning [73.46118996284888]
Research on backdoor attacks against multimodal contrastive learning models faces two key challenges: stealthiness and persistence.<n>We propose BadCLIP++, a unified framework that tackles both challenges.<n>For stealthiness, we introduce a semantic-fusion QR micro-trigger that embeds imperceptible patterns near task-relevant regions.<n>For persistence, we stabilize trigger embeddings via radius shrinkage and centroid alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T08:31:16Z) - Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z) - Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z) - The Eminence in Shadow: Exploiting Feature Boundary Ambiguity for Robust Backdoor Attacks [51.468144272905135]
Deep neural networks (DNNs) underpin critical applications yet remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis targeting backdoor attacks, focusing on how sparse decision boundaries enable disproportionate model manipulation.<n>We propose Eminence, an explainable and robust black-box backdoor framework with provable theoretical guarantees and inherent stealth properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T08:09:07Z) - Parrot: Persuasion and Agreement Robustness Rating of Output Truth -- A Sycophancy Robustness Benchmark for LLMs [0.0]
PARROT (Persuasion and Agreement Robustness Rating of Output Truth) is a robustness focused framework designed to measure the degradation in accuracy under social pressure exerted on users.<n>We evaluate 22 models using 1,302 MMLU-style multiple-choice questions across 13 domains and domain-specific authority templates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T13:01:28Z) - Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning [53.25336975467293]
We present the first theoretical error decomposition analysis of methods such as perplexity and self-consistency.<n>Our analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off: perplexity methods suffer from substantial model error due to the absence of a proper consistency function.<n>We propose Reasoning-Pruning Perplexity Consistency (RPC), which integrates perplexity with self-consistency, and Reasoning Pruning, which eliminates low-probability reasoning paths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T18:09:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.