Institutional Trust and the Domestic AI Advantage: Evidence from DeepSeek and ChatGPT Users in China

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01228v1
• Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 13:25:46 GMT
• Title: Institutional Trust and the Domestic AI Advantage: Evidence from DeepSeek and ChatGPT Users in China
• Abstract summary: Public trust in generative artificial intelligence exhibits increasingly divergent patterns across national contexts.<n>This study argues that trust in AI is not merely a technical response to performance but a product of institutional refraction.
• Score: 9.13480043282073
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Public trust in generative artificial intelligence exhibits increasingly divergent patterns across national contexts, yet prevailing research largely overlooks the macro-structural forces underlying this divergence. This study argues that trust in AI is not merely a technical response to performance but a product of institutional refraction. We propose an ``Institutional Prism'' framework to demonstrate how institutional trust shapes user trust in domestic (DeepSeek) and global (ChatGPT) large language models. Drawing on Cognitive-Affective Trust Theory, we distinguish between cognitive and affective dimensions of trust and analyze survey data from 405 Chinese users. The findings show that higher institutional trust is positively associated with stronger affective trust in domestic AI models and shifts cognitive evaluations in a more favorable direction. While under lower institutional trust, this domestic advantage weakens. These findings reveal that institutional trust has emerged as a core dimension of AI trust formation. By linking micro-level psychological judgments with macro-level governance, this research contributes a new perspective to human-machine communication.

Related papers

• Revisiting Trust in the Era of Generative AI: Factorial Structure and Latent Profiles [5.109743403025609]
  Trust is one of the most important factors shaping whether and how people adopt and rely on artificial intelligence (AI)<n>Most existing studies measure trust in terms of functionality, focusing on whether a system is reliable, accurate, or easy to use.<n>In this study, we introduce and validate the Human-AI Trust Scale (HAITS), a new measure designed to capture both the rational and relational aspects of trust in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T12:39:53Z)
• A closer look at how large language models trust humans: patterns and biases [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents increasingly interact with humans in decision-making contexts.<n>LLMs rely on some sort of implicit effective trust in trust-related contexts to assist and affect decision making.<n>We study whether LLMs trust depends on the three major trustworthiness dimensions: competence, benevolence and integrity of the human subject.<n>We find that in most, but not all cases, LLM trust is strongly predicted by trustworthiness, and in some cases also biased by age, religion and gender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T11:31:50Z)
• Is Trust Correlated With Explainability in AI? A Meta-Analysis [0.0]
  We conduct a comprehensive examination of the existing literature to explore the relationship between AI explainability and trust.<n>Our analysis, incorporating data from 90 studies, reveals a statistically significant but moderate positive correlation between the explainability of AI systems and the trust they engender.<n>This research highlights its broader socio-technical implications, particularly in promoting accountability and fostering user trust in critical domains such as healthcare and justice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:30:55Z)
• The Jade Gateway to Trust: Exploring How Socio-Cultural Perspectives Shape Trust Within Chinese NFT Communities [53.778565588482294]
  The emergence of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) has transformed how we handle digital assets and value.<n>Despite their initial popularity, NFTs face declining adoption influenced not only by cryptocurrency volatility but also by trust dynamics within communities.<n>Our research identifies three critical trust dimensions in China's NFT market: technological, institutional, and social.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T10:03:30Z)
• Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios.<n>Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• Distrust in (X)AI -- Measurement Artifact or Distinct Construct? [0.0]
  Trust is a key motivation in developing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) Distrust seems relatively understudied in XAI. psychometric evidence favors a distinction between trust and distrust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T07:14:54Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Where Does Trust Break Down? A Quantitative Trust Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Trust Matrix and Conditional Trust Densities [94.65749466106664]
  We introduce the concept of trust matrix, a novel trust quantification strategy. A trust matrix defines the expected question-answer trust for a given actor-oracle answer scenario. We further extend the concept of trust densities with the notion of conditional trust densities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T14:33:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.