Position: Prioritize Identifying Structure, Not Complex Models, for Scientific Discovery
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02632v1
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 15:21:58 GMT
- Title: Position: Prioritize Identifying Structure, Not Complex Models, for Scientific Discovery
- Abstract summary: Modern Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used to generate scientific hypotheses and mechanistic explanations from observational data.<n>This paper argues that in the high-dimensional proxy regimes where modern ML excels, mechanistic learning is generically underdetermined.<n>This underdetermination becomes uniquely hazardous with large language models (LLMs), which tend to collapse large equivalence classes of explanations into a single fluent narrative.
- Score: 1.3875545441867139
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modern Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, especially large language models (LLMs), are increasingly used to generate scientific hypotheses and mechanistic explanations from observational data. This position paper argues that in the high-dimensional proxy regimes where modern ML excels, mechanistic learning is generically underdetermined: many incompatible mechanisms induce essentially the same observational relationships on the support of the data, so predictive success and coherent explanations are insufficient evidence of mechanism discovery. This underdetermination becomes uniquely hazardous with large language models (LLMs), which tend to collapse large equivalence classes of explanations into a single fluent narrative. This paper proposes concrete standards for ``mechanistic ML,'' and argues these norms are necessary if LLM-centered workflows are to support science rather than merely simulate it.
Related papers
- OMNIFLOW: A Physics-Grounded Multimodal Agent for Generalized Scientific Reasoning [51.33849811496781]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical reasoning capabilities but frequently struggle with the continuous dynamics by Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)<n>We propose OMNIFLOW, a multimodal-symbolic architecture designed to ground frozen LLMs in fundamental physical laws without requiring domain-specific parameter updates.<n>We evaluate it on a benchmark spanning microscopic turbulence, theoretical Navier-Stokes, and macroscopic global weather forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T18:29:01Z) - Farther the Shift, Sparser the Representation: Analyzing OOD Mechanisms in LLMs [100.02824137397464]
We investigate how Large Language Models adapt their internal representations when encountering inputs of increasing difficulty.<n>We reveal a consistent and quantifiable phenomenon: as task difficulty increases, the last hidden states of LLMs become substantially sparser.<n>This sparsity--difficulty relation is observable across diverse models and domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T18:48:15Z) - Hierarchical Latent Structures in Data Generation Process Unify Mechanistic Phenomena across Scale [50.33952894976367]
We use context-free grammars to generate synthetic corpora that are faithful and computationally efficient proxies for web-scale text corpora.<n>We investigate the emergence of three mechanistic phenomena: induction heads, function vectors, and the Hydra effect, under our designed data generation process.<n>Our findings suggest that hierarchical structures in the data generation process serve as the X-factor in explaining the emergence of these phenomena.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T14:49:13Z) - Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents [1.2687030176231846]
Large language model (LLM)-driven agents are emerging as a powerful new paradigm for solving complex problems.<n>This Letter proposes a method to estimate the underlying generative directionality of LLMs embedded within agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T20:04:23Z) - Atomic Reasoning for Scientific Table Claim Verification [83.14588611859826]
Non-experts are susceptible to misleading claims based on scientific tables due to their high information density and perceived credibility.<n>Existing table claim verification models, including state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), often struggle with precise fine-grained reasoning.<n>Inspired by Cognitive Load Theory, we propose that enhancing a model's ability to interpret table-based claims involves reducing cognitive load.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T02:46:22Z) - Computation Mechanism Behind LLM Position Generalization [59.013857707250814]
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit flexibility in handling textual positions.<n>They can understand texts with position perturbations and generalize to longer texts.<n>This work connects the linguistic phenomenon with LLMs' computational mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T15:47:37Z) - Using Machine Learning to Discover Parsimonious and Physically-Interpretable Representations of Catchment-Scale Rainfall-Runoff Dynamics [0.8594140167290097]
We develop parsimonious minimally-optimal representations that can facilitate better insight regarding system functioning.<n>We find that both physical interpretability and good predictive performance can be achieved using a distributed-state network.<n>The results indicate that MCP-based ML models with only a few layers (up to two) and relativity few physical flow pathways can play a significant role in ML-based streamflow modelling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T08:30:01Z) - Reasoning Circuits in Language Models: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Syllogistic Inference [13.59675117792588]
Recent studies on language models (LMs) have sparked a debate on whether they can learn systematic inferential principles.<n>This paper presents a mechanistic interpretation of syllogistic inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T07:47:39Z) - Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment [10.814585613336778]
Causal representation learning aims to combine the core strengths of machine learning and causality.
This thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T09:14:40Z) - A phase transition between positional and semantic learning in a solvable model of dot-product attention [30.96921029675713]
Morelinear model dot-product attention is studied as a non-dimensional self-attention layer with trainable and low-dimensional query and key data.
We show that either a positional attention mechanism (with tokens each other based on their respective positions) or a semantic attention mechanism (with tokens tied to each other based their meaning) or a transition from the former to the latter with increasing sample complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T11:13:54Z) - Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing.
This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z) - Scientific Inference With Interpretable Machine Learning: Analyzing Models to Learn About Real-World Phenomena [4.312340306206884]
Interpretable machine learning offers a solution by analyzing models holistically to derive interpretations.
Current IML research is focused on auditing ML models rather than leveraging them for scientific inference.
We present a framework for designing IML methods-termed 'property descriptors' that illuminate not just the model, but also the phenomenon it represents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-11T10:13:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.