Reproducibility is the New Copyleft: Defining AGI-oriented Reproducible Builds

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03019v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 01:50:24 GMT
• Title: Reproducibility is the New Copyleft: Defining AGI-oriented Reproducible Builds
• Abstract summary: Copyleft was a legal hack that used copyright to guarantee user freedom by tying the availability of source code to every act of distribution.<n>This paper argues that a functional analogue of copyleft for AGI must be grounded not in share-alike clauses over code, but in reproducible builds.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Copyleft, as implemented in licenses such as the GNU General Public License, was a legal hack that used copyright to guarantee user freedom by tying the availability of source code to every act of distribution. Its normative force rested on an implicit technical premise: that source code and object code stand in a well-defined, humanly auditable, and reproducible relationship. Large language models and, prospectively, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems systematically violate this premise. The artifacts jointly required to reconstruct a model -- code, data, weights, hyperparameters, toolchain, and hardware configuration -- are each subject to independent legal, technical, and economic constraints that no current open-source framework fully resolves. Sufficiently capable AI systems can also rewrite licensed source into functionally equivalent derivatives stripped of their original obligations, a form of laundering against which copyleft has no effective defense. This paper argues that a functional analogue of copyleft for AGI must be grounded not in share-alike clauses over code, but in reproducible builds: a practice guaranteeing bit-exact reconstructability from declared inputs. We review the logic of copyleft, critically examine Maffulli's Second Liberation thesis according to which AI fulfills Stallman's dream, and show that the argument collapses unless AGI systems are themselves reproducible. Drawing on the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID), the Model Openness Framework (MOF), OpenMDW, and deterministic-inference research, we define seven requirements for AGI-oriented reproducible builds. We further argue that the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and analogous AI-to-AI coupling mechanisms constitute a new dynamic linking layer for which copyleft-style licensing is ill-suited, and that Masnick's "protocols, not platforms" framework offers a more promising governance template.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• Ensuring Open Source Integrity: The Intersection of Copy-Based Reuse and License Compliance [11.111309839462814]
  We create a copy-based code reuse network mapping direct copying across projects.<n>We find that code in repositories with permissive licenses, such as MIT and Apache, shows higher likelihood of reuse.<n>Public domain licenses, despite their aim of allowing unrestricted use, are associated with lower likelihood of copy-based reuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T15:44:06Z)
• VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents [57.240036084348354]
  We introduce VASO, a framework for verification-guided self-evolution of robot skill contracts.<n>VASO verifies logically inconsistent skill contracts, then verifies plans induced by the skill against global and local temporal specifications.<n>On Clearpath Jackal and PX4 quadcopter tasks, VASO reaches 97.2% formal-specification compliance using fewer than 100 optimization samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T20:02:35Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Explainable Disentangled Representation Learning for Generalizable Authorship Attribution in the Era of Generative AI [70.05655131235999]
  Explainable Authorship Variational Autoencoder (EAVAE) is a novel framework that explicitly disentangles style from content.<n>Disentanglement is enforced through a novel discriminator.<n>EAVAE excels in few-shot learning over the M4 dataset for AI-generated text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T05:34:20Z)
• NERFIFY: A Multi-Agent Framework for Turning NeRF Papers into Code [49.610331036334316]
  We introduce NERFIFY, a framework that reliably converts NeRF research papers into trainable Nerfstudio plugins.<n>Code, data and implementations will be publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T20:57:32Z)
• Copyright Laundering Through the AI Ouroboros: Adapting the 'Fruit of the Poisonous Tree' Doctrine to Recursive AI Training [0.31061678033205636]
  Copyright enforcement rests on an evidentiary bargain.<n>It comes under strain when AI systems are trained through multi-generational pipelines.<n>This Article adapts the "fruit of the poisonous tree" (FOPT) principle to propose a AI-FOPT standard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T01:02:50Z)
• SoK: Large Language Model Copyright Auditing via Fingerprinting [69.14570598973195]
  We introduce a unified framework and formal taxonomy that categorizes existing methods into white-box and black-box approaches.<n>We propose LeaFBench, the first systematic benchmark for evaluating LLM fingerprinting under realistic deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T12:56:57Z)
• The Case for Contextual Copyleft: Licensing Open Source Training Data and Generative AI [1.2776470520481564]
  This article introduces the Contextual Copyleft AI (CCAI) license, a novel licensing mechanism that extends copyleft requirements from training data to the resulting generative AI models.<n>The CCAI license offers significant advantages, including enhanced developer control, incentivization of open source AI development, and mitigation of openwashing practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T01:42:51Z)
• OML: A Primitive for Reconciling Open Access with Owner Control in AI Model Distribution [35.68672391812135]
  We introduce OML, a primitive that enables a new distribution paradigm for AI models.<n>OML can be freely distributed for local execution while maintaining cryptographically enforced usage authorization.<n>This work opens a new research direction at the intersection of cryptography, machine learning, and mechanism design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T18:46:03Z)
• Are ChatGPT and Other Similar Systems the Modern Lernaean Hydras of AI? [1.3961068233384444]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence systems ("AI systems") have created unprecedented social engagement. They allegedly steal the open-source code stored in virtual libraries, known as repositories. This Article focuses on how this happens and whether there is a solution that protects innovation and avoids years of litigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:40:30Z)
• Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
  In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.