Sample-Size Scaling of the African Languages NLI Evaluation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03219v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:27:16 GMT
- Title: Sample-Size Scaling of the African Languages NLI Evaluation
- Abstract summary: The study is a systematic sample-size scaling study of natural language inference (NLI) on 16 African languages based on the AfriXNLI benchmark.<n>Two multilingual transformer models with roughly 0.6B parameters XLM-R Large fine-tuned on XNLI and AfroXLM-R Large are tested on sample sizes of between 50 and 500 labeled examples.<n>As opposed to the usual belief of monotonic increase with increased data, we find a strongly language sensitive and often non-monotonic scaling behavior.
- Score: 0.9134244356393665
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: African languages have very little labelled data, and it is unclear if augmenting the quantity of annotation data reliably enhances downstream performance. The study is a systematic sample-size scaling study of natural language inference (NLI) on 16 African languages based on the AfriXNLI benchmark. Under controlled conditions, two multilingual transformer models with roughly 0.6B parameters XLM-R Large fine-tuned on XNLI and AfroXLM-R Large are tested on sample sizes of between 50 and 500 labeled examples and average their results across random subsampling runs. As opposed to the usual belief of monotonic increase with increased data, we find a strongly language sensitive and often non-monotonic scaling behavior. Some languages show early saturation or decrease in performance with sample size as well as high variance in low resource regimes. These results indicate that the volume of data is not enough to guarantee stable profits to African NLI, creating the necessity of language sensitive datasets creation and stronger multi-lingual modelling strategies.
Related papers
- Structure, Association, and Decision Value: Representation-Based Difficulty Estimation for Adaptive Inference in African-Language NLI [0.0]
We study natural language inference across 15 African languages with frozen off-the-shelf checkpoints.<n>Because AfriXNLI is derived from XNLI, its English, French and Swahili configurations cannot serve as clean evaluations for XNLI-trained models.<n>Our central methodological finding is that a representation statistic can be statistically significant for one notion of computational benefit while being irrelevant to another.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-19T15:03:51Z) - Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages [39.985923582735936]
We introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics, which include the Fertility Ratio (F), Retrieval Proxy (R), Pre-training Exposure (E) and Corpus Diversity (D)<n>These metrics reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T09:20:17Z) - Lugha-Llama: Adapting Large Language Models for African Languages [48.97516583523523]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in a wide range of natural language applications.<n>We consider how to adapt LLMs to low-resource African languages.<n>We find that combining curated data from African languages with high-quality English educational texts results in a training mix that substantially improves the model's performance on these languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T02:25:53Z) - Small Models, Big Impact: Efficient Corpus and Graph-Based Adaptation of Small Multilingual Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [10.418542753869433]
Low-resource languages (LRLs) face significant challenges in natural language processing (NLP) due to limited data.<n>Current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still struggle with LRLs.<n>Small multilingual models (mLMs) such as mBERT and XLM-R offer greater promise due to a better fit of their capacity to low training data sizes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T13:10:39Z) - Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages.<n>For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively.<n>We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z) - Pre-training a Transformer-Based Generative Model Using a Small Sepedi Dataset [0.5530212768657544]
We use the Sepedi monolingual (SepMono) dataset from several South African resources and the Sepedi radio news (SepNews) dataset from the radio news domain.<n>Our results show that the non-occlusion models perform better compared to the occlusion-based models when measuring validation loss and perplexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-25T17:25:06Z) - IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models [18.083861654053585]
This paper introduces IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 17 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages.<n>We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and six proprietary language models.<n>We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Gemma 2 27B only at 63% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T15:23:08Z) - mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation [79.60172087719356]
Abstractive summarization has enjoyed renewed interest in recent years, thanks to pre-trained language models and the availability of large-scale datasets.
Despite promising results, current models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries.
We leverage factual consistency evaluation models to improve multilingual summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T19:52:41Z) - AfroMT: Pretraining Strategies and Reproducible Benchmarks for
Translation of 8 African Languages [94.75849612191546]
AfroMT is a standardized, clean, and reproducible machine translation benchmark for eight widely spoken African languages.
We develop a suite of analysis tools for system diagnosis taking into account the unique properties of these languages.
We demonstrate significant improvements when pretraining on 11 languages, with gains of up to 2 BLEU points over strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-10T07:45:21Z) - Self-Training Sampling with Monolingual Data Uncertainty for Neural
Machine Translation [98.83925811122795]
We propose to improve the sampling procedure by selecting the most informative monolingual sentences to complement the parallel data.
We compute the uncertainty of monolingual sentences using the bilingual dictionary extracted from the parallel data.
Experimental results on large-scale WMT English$Rightarrow$German and English$Rightarrow$Chinese datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T05:01:36Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.