Perceive Before Reasoning: A Pre-Reasoning Perception Framework for Efficient and Reliable Proactive Mobile Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03236v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 06:54:02 GMT
- Title: Perceive Before Reasoning: A Pre-Reasoning Perception Framework for Efficient and Reliable Proactive Mobile Agents
- Abstract summary: We propose the textbfPre-Reasoning Perception Framework (PRPF), a two-stage framework built on perceiving before reasoning.<n>PRPF introduces a lightweight Multimodal Proactive Perceptor (MPP) for intervention gating and context compression, and activates the Proactive Agent Reasoner (PAR) only when intervention is warranted.<n> Experiments on the ProactiveMobile benchmark show that PRPF substantially reduces false trigger rates (FTR) while improving success rates (SR) and inference efficiency over the ProactiveMobile baseline.
- Score: 17.725926482772227
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have substantially advanced mobile agents, yet proactive mobile assistance remains challenging because agents must decide \emph{when} to intervene before determining \emph{how} to assist. Existing systems often implement these two decisions within a unified MLLM-based pipeline, leading to goal misalignment between conservative intervention filtering and comprehensive assistance generation, as well as redundant inference when the agent should remain silent. To address these limitations, we propose the \textbf{Pre-Reasoning Perception Framework (PRPF)}, a two-stage framework built on perceiving before reasoning. PRPF introduces a lightweight Multimodal Proactive Perceptor (MPP) for intervention gating and context compression, and activates the Proactive Agent Reasoner (PAR) only when intervention is warranted. Experiments on the ProactiveMobile benchmark show that PRPF substantially reduces false trigger rates (FTR) while improving success rates (SR) and inference efficiency over the ProactiveMobile baseline.
Related papers
- Latent Action Reparameterization for Efficient Agent Inference [56.42014061367112]
We propose a framework that learns a compact latent action space in which each latent action corresponds to a multi-step semantic behavior.<n>Unlike hand-crafted macros or hierarchical controllers, latent actions are learned from agent trajectories and integrated directly into the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T16:07:44Z) - Harnessing LLM Agents with Skill Programs [58.356514745548026]
We introduce HASP, a new framework that upgrades skills into executable Program Functions (PFs)<n>PFs act as executable guardrails that activate on failure-prone states and modify the next action or inject corrective context.<n> HASP drives substantial gains compared to both training-free and training-based methods on web-search, math reasoning, and coding tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T01:35:11Z) - FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments [60.3427704389541]
Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents.<n>Yet, in conversational benchmarks, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making.<n>We present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic framework to tackle these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T02:21:53Z) - Adaptive Stopping for Multi-Turn LLM Reasoning [19.992892941191577]
We propose Multi-Turn Language Models with Conformal Prediction (MiCP) for multi-turn reasoning.<n>MiCP allocates different error budgets across turns, enabling the model to stop early while maintaining an overall coverage guarantee.<n>We demonstrate MiCP on adaptive RAG and ReAct, where it achieves the target coverage on both single-hop and multi-hop question answering benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T21:22:19Z) - ICON: Indirect Prompt Injection Defense for Agents based on Inference-Time Correction [24.416258744287166]
ICON is a probing-to-mitigation framework that neutralizes attacks while preserving task continuity.<n>ICON achieves a competitive 0.4% ASR, matching commercial grade detectors, while yielding a over 50% task utility gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-24T09:13:05Z) - Pushing Forward Pareto Frontiers of Proactive Agents with Behavioral Agentic Optimization [61.641777037967366]
Proactive large language model (LLM) agents aim to actively plan, query, and interact over multiple turns.<n>Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising solution for training such agents in multi-turn settings.<n>We propose BAO, an agentic RL framework that combines behavior enhancement to enrich proactive reasoning and information-gathering capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T20:40:43Z) - DLLM Agent: See Farther, Run Faster [94.74432470237817]
Diffusion large language models (DLLMs) have emerged as an alternative to autoregressive (AR) decoding with appealing efficiency and modeling properties.<n>We study this in a controlled setting by instantiatingDLLM and AR backbones within the same agent workflow.<n>We find thatDLLM Agents are on average over 30% faster end to end than AR agents, with some cases exceeding 8x speedup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-07T09:01:18Z) - DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Large Language Model for Search Agents [31.08047797205678]
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLLLMs) have demonstrated unique efficiency advantages, enabled by their inherently parallel decoding mechanism and flexible generation paradigm.<n>Despite the rapid advancement of Search Agents, their practical deployment is constrained by a fundamental limitation termed as 1) Challenge: the serial execution of multi-round reasoning, tool calling, and tool response waiting under the ReAct agent paradigm.<n>In this paper, we propose an optimization framework for dLLM-based Search Agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T09:12:08Z) - SAND: Boosting LLM Agents with Self-Taught Action Deliberation [54.48979740613828]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are commonly tuned with supervised finetuning on ReAct-style expert trajectories or preference optimization over pairwise rollouts.<n>We propose Self-taught ActioN Deliberation (SAND) framework, enabling LLM agents to explicitly deliberate over candidate actions before committing to one.<n>SAND achieves an average 20% improvement over initial supervised finetuning and also outperforms state-of-the-art agent tuning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T05:38:15Z) - Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning [8.800516398660069]
Multiagent collaboration has emerged as a promising framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Debate Only When Necessary (DOWN), an adaptive multiagent debate framework that selectively activates debate based on the confidence score of the agent's initial response.<n>Down improves efficiency by up to six times while preserving or even outperforming the performance of existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T13:17:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.