Towards Characterizing Scientific Image Utility and Upgradability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03401v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:42:29 GMT
• Title: Towards Characterizing Scientific Image Utility and Upgradability
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for scientific image evaluation.<n>We categorize scientific image corruption into four fundamental types: Detail Distortion, Incompleteness, False Content, and Entity Confusion.<n>The framework implements a two-stage evaluation protocol: the textitUtility stage evaluates error detection capability and repair instruction generation, while the textitUpgradability stage assesses whether corrections faithfully restore scientific validity without compromising existing accurate information.
• Score: 71.77263034120624
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Scientific images function as critical evidence in research communication, yet their integrity faces unprecedented threats from AI-generated content that introduces subtle but consequential errors. Existing evaluation paradigms prove inadequate: perceptual quality metrics poorly correlate with scientific validity, while language models lack domain-specific verification capabilities. To address this gap, we propose the \textbf{S}cientific \textbf{I}mage \textbf{U}tility and \textbf{U}pgradability \textbf{A}ssessment (\textbf{SIU$^2$A}) framework, which introduces two complementary dimensions for scientific image evaluation. \textbf{Utility} encompasses \textit{error detection} (identifying scientific inaccuracies) and \textit{correction feasibility} (assessing whether errors can be reliably repaired). \textbf{Upgradability} measures the quality of correction. We categorize scientific image corruption into four fundamental types: Detail Distortion, Incompleteness, False Content, and Entity Confusion. Based on this taxonomy, we construct SIU$^2$A-Benchmark, a dataset with expert annotations for error identification and repair. The framework implements a two-stage evaluation protocol: the \textit{Utility} stage evaluates error detection capability and repair instruction generation, while the \textit{Upgradability} stage assesses whether corrections faithfully restore scientific validity without compromising existing accurate information. Experiments reveal that current multimodal systems exhibit significant limitations in both scientific error assessment and faithful correction, exposing a fundamental gap between visual perception and scientific usability.

Related papers

• Where, What, Why, and Importance: Structured Defect Grounding for Text-to-Image Feedback [51.08692072066352]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models still exhibit localized, subtle, and structurally complex failures.<n>Structured Defect Grounding casts T2I diagnosis as structured set prediction by modeling each defect as a location, type, reason, importance.<n>Our detector outperforms leading proprietary VLMs on structured defect grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T13:03:16Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• PRISM: Prior Rectification and Uncertainty-Aware Structure Modeling for Diffusion-Based Text Image Super-Resolution [51.96078493242164]
  PRISM is a single-step diffusion-based Text-SR framework.<n> PRISM achieves state-of-the-art performance with millisecond-level inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T05:31:06Z)
• The Cost of Context: Mitigating Textual Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation [18.83395586542378]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly integrated with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>We identify and formalize the phenomenon of recorruption, where the introduction of even perfectly accurate "oracle" context causes a capable model to abandon an initially correct prediction.<n>We propose Bottleneck Attention Intervention for Recovery (BAIR), a parameter-free, inference-time framework that restores visual saliency and applies position-aware penalties to textual distractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T02:27:04Z)
• Evian: Towards Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data Auditing [14.93566912726999]
  We introduce a novel "Decomposition-then-Evaluation" paradigm that breaks model responses into constituent cognitive components.<n>We instantiate this paradigm via EVIAN, an automated framework that evaluates these components along the axes of Image-Text Consistency, Logical Coherence, and Factual Accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T13:28:27Z)
• SIQA: Toward Reliable Scientific Image Quality Assessment [72.41803245808924]
  We introduce Scientific Image Quality Assessment (SIQA), a framework that models scientific image quality along two complementary dimensions.<n>We design two evaluation protocols: SIQA-U (Understanding), which measures semantic comprehension of scientific content through multiple-choice tasks, and SIQA-S (Scoring), which evaluates alignment with expert quality judgments.<n>Experiments across representative multimodal large language models (MLLMs) reveal a consistent discrepancy between scoring alignment and scientific understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T06:57:26Z)
• Semantic Visual Anomaly Detection and Reasoning in AI-Generated Images [96.43608872116347]
  AnomReason is a large-scale benchmark with structured annotations as quadruple textbfAnomAgent<n>AnomReason and AnomAgent serve as a foundation for measuring and improving the semantic plausibility of AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T14:09:24Z)
• Seeing is Believing? Mitigating OCR Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models [24.363156120809546]
  We propose KIE-HVQA, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating OCR hallucination in degraded document understanding.<n>This dataset includes test samples spanning identity cards and invoices, with simulated real-world degradations for OCR reliability.<n>Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL demonstrate that our 7B- parameter model achieves a 22% absolute improvement in hallucination-free accuracy over GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T06:44:07Z)
• Zero-shot Faithful Factual Error Correction [53.121642212060536]
  Faithfully correcting factual errors is critical for maintaining the integrity of textual knowledge bases and preventing hallucinations in sequence-to-sequence models. We present a zero-shot framework that formulates questions about input claims, looks for correct answers in the given evidence, and assesses the faithfulness of each correction based on its consistency with the evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T18:55:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.