Tool-Aware Optimization with Entropy Guidance for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03762v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:16:12 GMT
- Title: Tool-Aware Optimization with Entropy Guidance for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: We propose a unified framework TAO-RL that couples tool-aware trajectory filtering with entropy-guided exploration for efficient policy optimization.<n>Specifically, TAO-RL filters rollout trajectories along two criteria: discarding those where all tool invocations fail to execute, and removing those where all rollouts are either correct or incorrect.<n>At the algorithmic level, we introduce a tool-aware entropy-guided bonus that reshapes the advantage function at post-tool-call tokens, encouraging the policy to explore more diverse reasoning paths.
- Score: 33.576201769173224
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) equips large language models (LLMs) with tool-use capabilities that substantially improve reasoning on complex tasks. However, integrating external tools often destabilizes training: over-reliance on tools can induce input distribution shift, while overly conservative tool use limits effective exploration. To address this issue, we propose a unified framework TAO-RL that couples tool-aware trajectory filtering with entropy-guided exploration for efficient policy optimization. Specifically, at the data level, TAO-RL filters rollout trajectories along two criteria: discarding those where all tool invocations fail to execute, and removing those where all rollouts are either correct or incorrect, as both cases yield degenerate advantage estimates that contribute no discriminative learning signal. This joint filtering retains data that are both tool-capable and informative, establishing a high-quality training distribution. At the algorithmic level, we introduce a tool-aware entropy-guided bonus that reshapes the advantage function at post-tool-call tokens, encouraging the policy to explore more diverse reasoning paths at critical decision points. These two components are mutually reinforcing: trajectory filtering establishes a clean and informative training foundation, while entropy-guided exploration drives stronger reasoning behaviors at critical tool-interaction junctures. Extensive experiments on 7 challenging reasoning benchmarks across 3 model scales demonstrate the superiority of TAO-RL over existing methods.
Related papers
- HiDiffTIR: Hierarchical Difficulty-Aware Policy Optimization for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning [95.29291773706224]
Tool-Integrated Reasoning is a capability for LLM agents to solve complex tasks by interacting with external tools iteratively.<n>Existing approaches typically assign uniform trajectory-level advantages and treat all correct tool calls equally.<n>This can lead to imprecise learning signals that do not adequately distinguish between trivial and challenging tool-use patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-22T09:14:15Z) - On Effectiveness and Efficiency of Agentic Tool-calling and RL Training [33.47538664943472]
This paper studies tool-calling along two complementary axes: effectiveness and efficiency.<n>We show that results can be highly sensitive to seemingly minor, often undocumented implementation choices.<n>We introduce two techniques that accelerate RL-based tool-calling training, achieving substantial wall-clock speedup without degrading performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T22:21:47Z) - Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Intrinsic Knowledge Boundary Enhancement [16.192937389387982]
We propose AKBE (Agentic Knowledge Boundary Enhancement), an on-policy method that dynamically probes the model's intrinsic knowledge boundary.<n> Experiments on seven QA benchmarks demonstrate that AKBE improves task accuracy by +1.85 on average and reduces tool calls by 18% over standard agentic RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T12:42:23Z) - TInR: Exploring Tool-Internalized Reasoning in Large Language Models [31.2602361688688]
Tool-Internalized Reasoning (TInR) is a tool-internalized reasoning framework for unified reasoning and tool usage.<n>TInR-U is trained through a three-phase pipeline: 1) tool internalization with a bidirectional knowledge alignment strategy; 2) supervised fine-tuning warm-up using high-quality reasoning annotations; and 3) reinforcement learning with TInR-specific rewards.<n>Experiment results show that TInR-U achieves superior performance in both settings, highlighting its effectiveness and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-12T19:38:19Z) - Reasoning and Tool-use Compete in Agentic RL:From Quantifying Interference to Disentangled Tuning [26.401906729658688]
Agentic Reinforcement Learning (ARL) focuses on training large language models to interleave reasoning with external tool execution to solve complex tasks.<n>Most existing ARL methods train a single shared model parameters to support both reasoning and tool use behaviors, implicitly assuming that joint training leads to improved overall agent performance.<n>We show that these two capabilities often induce misaligned gradient directions, leading to training interference that undermines the effectiveness of joint optimization.<n>We propose Disentangled Action Reasoning Tuning(DART), a simple and efficient framework that explicitly decouples parameter updates for reasoning and tool-use via separate low-rank
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T03:19:22Z) - Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Agentic Reasoning [90.3737088727791]
We conduct a comprehensive and systematic investigation to demystify reinforcement learning in agentic reasoning.<n>We highlight our key insights: (i) replacing stitched synthetic trajectories with real end-to-end tool-use trajectories yields a far stronger SFT.<n> Exploration-friendly techniques are crucial for agentic RL, such as clip higher, overlong reward shaping, and maintaining adequate policy entropy could improve the training efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T17:57:15Z) - Toward Effective Tool-Integrated Reasoning via Self-Evolved Preference Learning [68.89572566071575]
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) enables large language models (LLMs) to improve their internal reasoning ability by integrating external tools.<n>We propose Tool-Light, a framework designed to encourage LLMs to perform TIR efficiently and accurately.<n> Experimental results on 10 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of Tool-Light.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T12:53:37Z) - Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z) - Tool-Star: Empowering LLM-Brained Multi-Tool Reasoner via Reinforcement Learning [63.31585771716123]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities via large-scale reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce Tool-Star, an RL-based framework designed to empower LLMs to autonomously invoke multiple external tools during stepwise reasoning.<n>Tool-Star integrates six types of tools and incorporates systematic designs in both data synthesis and training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T09:00:19Z) - Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently [87.28134636548705]
Tool-integrated reasoning augments large language models with the ability to invoke external tools to solve tasks.<n>Current approaches typically optimize only for final correctness without considering the efficiency or necessity of external tool use.<n>We propose a framework that encourages models to produce accurate answers with minimal tool calls.<n>Our approach reduces tool calls by up to 68.3% and improves tool productivity by up to 215.4%, while maintaining comparable answer accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T05:40:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.