Need to Know: Contextual-Integrity-Grounded Query Rewriting for Privacy-Conscious LLM Delegation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04067v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 14:28:28 GMT
- Title: Need to Know: Contextual-Integrity-Grounded Query Rewriting for Privacy-Conscious LLM Delegation
- Abstract summary: We recast privacy preserving query rewriting under Contextual Integrity.<n>We propose a CI-guided reinforcement learning framework that converts essential and non-essential sensitive spans into verifiable optimization signals.<n> Experiments show that our learned rewriter achieves the best privacy-utility tradeoff, achieving up to +10.1 average utility over on-device baselines.
- Score: 50.614874098786515
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As LLMs become increasingly woven into everyday workflows, user queries sent to cloud hosted LLMs routinely mix task-essential content with task non-essential sensitive disclosures, yet type based PII redaction is context agnostic and may raise two issues: over disclosing untyped sensitive context and over removing answer bearing spans. We recast privacy preserving query rewriting under Contextual Integrity: a span should be forwarded only if it is necessary for the task. We introduce DelegateCI-Bench, the first task based Contextual Integrity benchmark for privacy-conscious delegation, comprising 3,167 samples that combine high quality synthetic data spanning 11 tasks and 20 task types, WildChat based real user queries, and a medical challenge set with dense sensitive information. Building on this benchmark, we propose a CI-guided reinforcement learning framework that converts essential and non-essential sensitive spans into verifiable optimization signals, and train a query rewriter to preserve task critical information while suppressing unnecessary sensitive disclosure. Experiments show that our learned rewriter achieves the best privacy-utility tradeoff, achieving up to +10.1 average utility over on-device baselines.
Related papers
- CLAIM: Leading Open-domain Active Clarification of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Measurement [50.91045324738942]
CLAIM is an uncertainty-driven framework for active clarification learning in open-domain settings.<n>We propose an entropy-driven synthetic data generation pipeline that integrates uncertainty estimation with semantic clustering and reasoning-based judgments.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that CLAIM can learn stable and generalizable clarification strategies without relying on manually labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T04:27:45Z) - ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z) - Minim: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local Sanitization [18.02530900891696]
LLM-powered autonomous agents increasingly rely on rich user interface (UI) state observations to achieve reliable action grounding.<n>Many deployments transmit the full UI state to remote inference servers even when most elements are irrelevant to the current task.<n>We propose MINIM, a trusted local broker that performs privacy-aware minimization on the client side before any observation leaves the device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T22:27:27Z) - It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs [73.46918128880786]
Self-distillation framework that decouples information suppression from task resolution.<n>Self-distillation framework that decouples information suppression from task resolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T13:57:44Z) - Anonymous-by-Construction: An LLM-Driven Framework for Privacy-Preserving Text [0.42821598129654453]
We develop an on-premise, LLM-driven substitution pipeline that anonymizes text.<n>We measure privacy, semantic utility, and trainability under privacy.<n>Our method attains state-of-the-art privacy, minimal topical drift, strong factual utility, and low trainability loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T23:46:15Z) - From Completion to Editing: Unlocking Context-Aware Code Infilling via Search-and-Replace Instruction Tuning [81.97788535387286]
We propose a framework that internalizes the agentic verification-and-editing mechanism into a unified, single-pass inference process.<n>With minimal data, SRI-Coder enables Chat models to surpass the completion performance of their Base counterparts.<n>Unlike FIM-style tuning, SRI preserves general coding competencies and maintains inference latency comparable to standard FIM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T20:33:53Z) - PrivacyPAD: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dynamic Privacy-Aware Delegation [33.37227619820212]
We introduce a novel reinforcement learning framework called PrivacyPAD to solve this problem.<n>Our framework trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks, learning a policy that optimally balances the trade-off between privacy leakage and task performance.<n>Our framework achieves a new state-of-the-art on the privacy-utility frontier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T19:38:36Z) - Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z) - Teaching Language Models To Gather Information Proactively [53.85419549904644]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to function as collaborative partners.<n>In this work, we introduce a new task paradigm: proactive information gathering.<n>We design a scalable framework that generates partially specified, real-world tasks, masking key information.<n>Within this setup, our core innovation is a reinforcement finetuning strategy that rewards questions that elicit genuinely new, implicit user information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T23:50:09Z) - ACCESS DENIED INC: The First Benchmark Environment for Sensitivity Awareness [2.5967788365637103]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly valuable to corporate data management due to their ability to process text from various document formats.<n>This work establishes a foundation for sensitivity-aware language models and provides insights to enhance privacy-centric AI systems in corporate environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-01T11:24:23Z) - Contextual Integrity in LLMs via Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning [41.795843170879046]
We develop a reinforcement learning framework that instills in models the reasoning necessary to achieve contextual integrity.<n>We show that our method substantially reduces inappropriate information disclosure while maintaining task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T21:26:21Z) - DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain
Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge.
Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.