The Saturation Trap and the Subjectivity of Intervention Timing: Why Affect-Based Triggers and LLM Judges Fail to Time Interventions on Autonomous Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04296v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 23:54:27 GMT
• Title: The Saturation Trap and the Subjectivity of Intervention Timing: Why Affect-Based Triggers and LLM Judges Fail to Time Interventions on Autonomous Agents
• Abstract summary: Intervention timing is a low-reliability construct, making single-annotator F1 an unsuitable optimization target.<n>Our contribution is the joint mapping of this problem across human inter-rater reliability, four detector architectures, a cross-model LLM-judge sweep, and a reproduced saturation effect.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As autonomous AI agents move from conversational systems to long-horizon software execution, runtime safety layers that decide when to interrupt an agent have become essential. We study this timing problem using a continuous 18-dimensional affective-dynamics engine (HEART) as a diagnostic probe, evaluating four intervention trigger families - absolute state thresholds, composite state-action patterns, regex reasoning-feature extraction, and zero-shot LLM-as-judge - against human-annotated intervention points on SWE-bench-Verified debugging traces. We report three findings. First, a State Saturation Trap: agents show no recovery signal under sustained difficulty, so modeled frustration quickly crosses the threshold and stays at its maximum, converting threshold-on-state triggers from moment detectors into near-constant indicators that fire on 39-83% of actions across five trajectories. Second, a capability-and-context floor for LLM judges: a small model (gpt-5.4-mini) never fires, while frontier and cross-vendor models escape the zero-firing floor only with full-trajectory context, and even then reach only F1 0.17-0.40 at up to 90x the cost. Third, and most importantly, the supervised target is not reproducible among humans: three trained annotators using one rubric on a 56-action trajectory agree on where to intervene only slightly above chance (location Krippendorff's alpha = +0.047; best pairwise Cohen's kappa = +0.349) and not at all on intervention type (pause degenerate; clarify below chance; reflect only alpha = +0.226). We conclude that intervention timing is a low-reliability construct, making single-annotator F1 an unsuitable optimization target. Our contribution is the joint mapping of this problem across human inter-rater reliability, four detector architectures, a cross-model LLM-judge sweep, and a reproduced saturation effect, rather than any single detector's accuracy.

Related papers

• Gating Before Commitment: Anticipating Intent Divergence to Prevent Post-Interaction Decision Failures in Autonomous Driving [11.206758778146282]
  We study a decision layer in which a language-guided intent module reads structured descriptors, computes a smoothed intent-geometry divergence score, and gates the planned maneuver before commitment.<n>On a replayed off-road departure and four crash clips under a frozen, disclosed implementation, gating is the only layer that repairs the plan.<n>The model's demonstrated roles are the fastest detection on these failures and an uncertainty veto on the geometric rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T17:42:03Z)
• Architecture-Dependent Causal Transfer of Activation States Across Large Language Models [51.56484100374058]
  Internal language activation states can be transferred causally between different large language models.<n>Injecting projected activations into a target model during generation produces a statistically significant, preregistered causal effect.<n>We conclude that end-to-end activation-state transfer between LLMs, as currently implemented, is architecture-dependent rather than universal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T09:53:27Z)
• TRACE: A Multi-Layer Benchmark for Human AI Controller Coordination Under Drift and Failure [0.0]
  Modern cyber-physical and AI-assisted systems couple human operators, AI decision modules, and automated controllers in a single control loop.<n>No standard benchmark captures time-aligned, multi-layer traces of how drift and failures propagate across these layers.<n>We construct a benchmark by injecting controlled drift into traces derived from ALFRED, a grounded-instruction benchmark for everyday household tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T00:03:55Z)
• Amplify, Don't Create: Temporal Accumulation for Slow-Burn Prompt Injection [0.0]
  Control-plane attacks against tool-using agents can instead distribute weak directives across a trajectory while keeping each event below threshold.<n>We test whether a proxy-side temporal accumulator recovers this slow-burn signal by reducing frozen per-event scores to peak and CUSUM persistence statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T23:39:38Z)
• Can LLM Agents Respond to Disasters? Benchmarking Heterogeneous Geospatial Reasoning in Emergency Operations [55.251494694783894]
  Disaster Operational Response Agent benchmark (DORA) is the first agentic benchmark for end-to-end disaster response.<n>Tasks span five dimensions that cover the operational disaster-response pipeline: disaster perception, spatial relational analysis, rescue and evacuation planning, temporal evolution reasoning, and multi-modal report synthesis.<n>DORA establishes a rigorous testbed for operationally reliable disaster-response agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T06:57:41Z)
• Trajectory-Consistent Flow Matching for Robust Visuomotor Policy Learning [1.7616042687330642]
  Flow matching policies learn continuous velocity fields that transport noise to actions, enabling deterministic inference for robot manipulation.<n>Standard training optimize a pointwise velocity objective while inference requires numerical integration of that field -- a mismatch that causes compounding trajectory errors.<n>We propose four complementary remedies: (1) auxiliary rectified flow velocity regression that provides uniform temporal supervision across the full time interval; (2) multi-step trajectory consistency training that supervises the integrated displacement of the velocity field over trajectory segments; and (3) velocity field regularization that enforces temporal smoothness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T21:44:10Z)
• Claw-Eval: Toward Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents [66.97968363332465]
  We introduce Claw-Eval, an end-to-end evaluation suite addressing all three gaps in agent benchmarks.<n>Claw-Eval comprises 300 human-verified tasks spanning 9 categories across three groups.<n>Every agent action is recorded through three independent evidence channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:43:18Z)
• OrgForge-IT: A Verifiable Synthetic Benchmark for LLM-Based Insider Threat Detection [0.0]
  We present a verifiable synthetic benchmark in which a deterministic simulation engine maintains ground truth and language models generate only surface prose.<n>The corpus spans 51 simulated days, 2,904 telemetry records at a 96.4% noise rate, and four detection scenarios designed to defeat single-surface and single-day triage strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T19:03:53Z)
• Global Prior Meets Local Consistency: Dual-Memory Augmented Vision-Language-Action Model for Efficient Robotic Manipulation [95.89924101984566]
  We introduce OptimusVLA, a dual-memory VLA framework with Global Prior Memory (GPM) and Local Consistency Memory (LCM)<n>GPM replaces Gaussian noise with task-level priors retrieved from semantically similar trajectories.<n>LCM injects a learned consistency constraint that enforces temporal coherence and smoothness of trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T15:39:34Z)
• Accurate Failure Prediction in Agents Does Not Imply Effective Failure Prevention [2.0838114053126366]
  Proactive interventions by LLM critic models are often assumed to improve reliability, yet their effects at deployment time are poorly understood.<n>We show that a binary LLM critic with strong offline accuracy (AUROC 0.94) can nevertheless cause severe performance degradation.<n>We propose a pre-deployment test that uses a small pilot of 50 tasks to estimate whether intervention is likely to help or harm, without requiring full deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T10:02:50Z)
• Trajectory Guard -- A Lightweight, Sequence-Aware Model for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Agentic AI [0.0]
  Trajectory Guard is a Siamese Recurrent Autoencoder with a hybrid loss function that jointly learns task-trajectory alignment via contrastive learning and sequential validity via reconstruction.<n>At 32 ms latency, our approach runs 17$-27times$ faster than LLM Judge baselines, enabling real-time safety verification in production deployments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T00:27:11Z)
• On GRPO Collapse in Search-R1: The Lazy Likelihood-Displacement Death Spiral [59.14787085809595]
  We identify Lazy Likelihood Displacement (LLD) as the core mechanism driving this failure.<n>LLD emerges early and triggers a self-reinforcing LLD Death Spiral, where declining likelihood leads to low-confidence responses.<n>We propose a lightweight likelihood-preserving regularization LLDS for GRPO that activates only when a trajectory's likelihood decreases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T19:41:15Z)
• Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails [103.05296856071931]
  We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies.<n>Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T14:48:39Z)
• Federated Spatiotemporal Graph Learning for Passive Attack Detection in Smart Grids [2.721477719641864]
  This paper introduces a graph-centric, multimodal detector that fuses physical-layer and behavioral indicators over temporal windows to detect passive attacks.<n>The model achieves a testing accuracy of 98.32% per-timestep and 93.35% per-sequence at 0.15% FPR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T08:52:30Z)
• Coordinate Transformer: Achieving Single-stage Multi-person Mesh Recovery from Videos [91.44553585470688]
  Multi-person 3D mesh recovery from videos is a critical first step towards automatic perception of group behavior in virtual reality, physical therapy and beyond. We propose the Coordinate transFormer (CoordFormer) that directly models multi-person spatial-temporal relations and simultaneously performs multi-mesh recovery in an end-to-end manner. Experiments on the 3DPW dataset demonstrate that CoordFormer significantly improves the state-of-the-art, outperforming the previously best results by 4.2%, 8.8% and 4.7% according to the MPJPE, PAMPJPE, and PVE metrics, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T18:23:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.