SharedRequest: Privacy-Preserving Model-Agnostic Inference for Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05004v1
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:23:06 GMT
- Title: SharedRequest: Privacy-Preserving Model-Agnostic Inference for Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: We propose a model-agnostic framework for privacy-preserving inference that reformulates privacy protection at the batch level rather than the individual-prompt level.<n>We show that SharedRequest achieves over $20%$ higher utility compared to prior differential privacy baselines.<n>Its shared-prompt mechanism reduces query cost by up to $5times$ compared to non-batched inference.
- Score: 15.707683926526725
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue. Existing privacy-preserving inference methods sacrifice either utility or efficiency, and often require model-specific modifications that limit their compatibility. In this paper, we propose SharedRequest, a model-agnostic framework for privacy-preserving LLM inference that reformulates privacy protection at the batch level rather than the individual-prompt level. The key idea is to obscure sensitive information by mixing original prompts with noisy variants, while grouping semantically equivalent instructions to amortize the inference cost over a large batch of queries with minimal impact on LLM response quality. This design is independent of the LLM architecture, requiring no access to model parameters or architectural modification. Empirical results demonstrate that SharedRequest achieves over $20\%$ higher utility compared to prior differential privacy baselines, and its shared-prompt mechanism reduces query cost by up to $5\times$ compared to non-batched inference.
Related papers
- Multi-tier Differential Private Query Release [57.049084914202275]
Multiple analysts may issue the same query, while receiving answers generated under different privacy budgets.<n>Existing approaches for such multi-tier DP queries either incur excessive cumulative privacy loss or suffer from suboptimal utility.<n>We propose a framework for multi-tier DP query release that simultaneously bound the cumulative privacy loss by the maximum privacy budget among all queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-14T02:10:22Z) - Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms Enable Cheap Verifiable Inference of LLMs [33.54139088666698]
Large language models (LLMs) continue to grow in size, leading to increased use of third-party hosting services.<n>Existing tools to verify inference typically rely on methods from cryptography such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs)<n>We develop a new insight -- that given a method for performing private LLM inference, one can obtain forms of verified inference at marginal extra cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T10:15:51Z) - Differentially Private and Communication Efficient Large Language Model Split Inference via Stochastic Quantization and Soft Prompt [33.701746954914135]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance and received significant research interest.<n>Existing approaches propose to allow the users to obfuscate the token embeddings before transmission and utilize local models for denoising.<n>We propose textbfDEL, a framework for textbfDifferentially private and communication textbfEfficient textbfLLM split inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T03:13:16Z) - NeuroFilter: Privacy Guardrails for Conversational LLM Agents [50.75206727081996]
This work addresses the computational challenge of enforcing privacy for agentic Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>NeuroFilter is a guardrail framework that operationalizes contextual integrity by mapping norm violations to simple directions in the model's activation space.<n>A comprehensive evaluation across over 150,000 interactions, covering models from 7B to 70B parameters, illustrates the strong performance of NeuroFilter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T05:16:50Z) - Urania: Differentially Private Insights into AI Use [102.27238986985698]
$Urania$ provides end-to-end privacy protection by leveraging DP tools such as clustering, partition selection, and histogram-based summarization.<n>Results show the framework's ability to extract meaningful conversational insights while maintaining stringent user privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T07:00:31Z) - Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit.
We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z) - No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference [30.554456047738295]
This study develops a framework for inferring privacy-protected Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>It lays down a solid theoretical basis for examining the interplay between privacy preservation and utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T08:22:53Z) - ConfusionPrompt: Practical Private Inference for Online Large Language Models [3.8134804426693094]
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) are typically deployed as online services, requiring users to transmit detailed prompts to cloud servers.
We introduce ConfusionPrompt, a novel framework for private LLM inference that protects user privacy by decomposing the original prompt into smaller sub-prompts.
We show that ConfusionPrompt achieves significantly higher utility than local inference methods using open-source models and perturbation-based techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-30T01:26:42Z) - Split-and-Denoise: Protect large language model inference with local differential privacy [2.572566198588905]
Split-N-Denoise (SnD) is a private inference framework that splits the model to execute the token embedding layer on the client side at minimal computational cost.
We show SnD's effectiveness in optimizing the privacy-utility tradeoff across various LLM architectures and diverse downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T14:17:33Z) - A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting [63.67296945525791]
We propose a new differential privacy paradigm called estimate-verify-release (EVR)
EVR paradigm first estimates the privacy parameter of a mechanism, then verifies whether it meets this guarantee, and finally releases the query output.
Our empirical evaluation shows the newly proposed EVR paradigm improves the utility-privacy tradeoff for privacy-preserving machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T00:38:01Z) - Just Fine-tune Twice: Selective Differential Privacy for Large Language
Models [69.66654761324702]
We propose a simple yet effective just-fine-tune-twice privacy mechanism to achieve SDP for large Transformer-based language models.
Experiments show that our models achieve strong performance while staying robust to the canary insertion attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-15T22:36:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.