Geographic Bias and Diversity in AI Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05187v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:32:32 GMT
• Title: Geographic Bias and Diversity in AI Evaluation
• Abstract summary: This chapter investigates the geographical nature of bias in (generative) AI.<n>We identify a range of geographic biases that span from representation bias in the training data to regional disparities in the factual recall of language models.<n>We showcase how recent studies address the latter bias by evaluating geographic diversity in the outputs of generative AI.
• Score: 13.861735837455626
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Among the many challenges hindering the responsible development and deployment of AI, arguably none has faced more intense scrutiny than bias in its various forms. This underscores the widespread concerns across AI researchers that model outputs, e.g., from generative AI, may encode structural distributional imbalances (stemming from training data or model design) that may amplify social inequality or introduce systemic distortions across application domains ranging from biodiversity to disaster mitigation. Yet, relatively little work has investigated the geographical nature of bias or developed measurable benchmarks for what it means for (generative) AI to be unbiased. In this chapter, we investigate this issue through a literature review. As foundation models are reshaping the landscape of bias research, we examine work spanning both the pre-generative AI and generative AI periods. First, we identify a range of geographic biases. These biases span from representation bias in the training data and regional disparities in the factual recall of language models to the tendency of generative AI to over-proportionally favor prototypical places (called defaults). Then, we showcase how recent studies address the latter bias by evaluating geographic diversity in the outputs of generative AI across various cognitive levels, parameter settings, and output modalities.

Related papers

• Assessing the Geographic Diversity of AI's Platial Representations in Image Generation [7.106770983243944]
  We show how to evaluate geographic diversity in image generation through a case study.<n>For instance, older models can exhibit greater geographic diversity despite producing lower-quality images.<n>We observe explicit model homogeneity underlying the lack of geographic diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T11:57:42Z)
• Anomaly Detection and Generation with Diffusion Models: A Survey [51.61574868316922]
  Anomaly detection (AD) plays a pivotal role across diverse domains, including cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, and industrial manufacturing.<n>Recent advancements in deep learning, specifically diffusion models (DMs), have sparked significant interest.<n>This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging DMs for innovative AD solutions across diverse applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T03:29:18Z)
• Exploring Bias in over 100 Text-to-Image Generative Models [49.60774626839712]
  We investigate bias trends in text-to-image generative models over time, focusing on the increasing availability of models through open platforms like Hugging Face.<n>We assess bias across three key dimensions: (i) distribution bias, (ii) generative hallucination, and (iii) generative miss-rate.<n>Our findings indicate that artistic and style-transferred models exhibit significant bias, whereas foundation models, benefiting from broader training distributions, are becoming progressively less biased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T03:40:44Z)
• Can Prompt Modifiers Control Bias? A Comparative Analysis of Text-to-Image Generative Models [8.419004940268023]
  This study examines the presence and manipulation of societal biases in leading text-to-image models: Stable Diffusion, DALL-E 3, and Adobe Firefly. Our findings reveal the challenges and potential of prompt engineering in controlling biases, highlighting the critical need for ethical AI development. This work advances AI ethics by not only revealing the nuanced dynamics of bias in text-to-image generation models but also by offering a novel framework for future research in controlling bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T00:54:57Z)
• Ecosystem-level Analysis of Deployed Machine Learning Reveals Homogeneous Outcomes [72.13373216644021]
  We study the societal impact of machine learning by considering the collection of models that are deployed in a given context. We find deployed machine learning is prone to systemic failure, meaning some users are exclusively misclassified by all models available. These examples demonstrate ecosystem-level analysis has unique strengths for characterizing the societal impact of machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T01:11:52Z)
• Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategies [11.323961700172175]
  This survey paper offers a succinct, comprehensive overview of fairness and bias in AI. We review sources of bias, such as data, algorithm, and human decision biases. We assess the societal impact of biased AI systems, focusing on the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T03:23:55Z)
• Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models [11.323961700172175]
  This article investigates the challenges and risks associated with biases in large-scale language models like ChatGPT. We discuss the origins of biases, stemming from, among others, the nature of training data, model specifications, algorithmic constraints, product design, and policy decisions. We review the current approaches to identify, quantify, and mitigate biases in language models, emphasizing the need for a multi-disciplinary, collaborative effort to develop more equitable, transparent, and responsible AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T17:14:00Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.