Central Description Length (CDL) Clustering Validation Index

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05230v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:47:09 GMT
• Title: Central Description Length (CDL) Clustering Validation Index
• Abstract summary: Clustering validation indices (CVIs) provide internal scores for ranking candidate clusterings.<n>Most popular CVIs are built from Euclidean compactness and separation terms.<n>This paper introduces the Central Description Length (CDL) clustering validation index.
• Score: 3.3517146652431378
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Selecting a clustering algorithm and its hyperparameters without labels is a common difficulty in engineering machine learning pipelines that work with unsupervised analysis of sensor, image, or process data. Clustering validation indices (CVIs) provide internal scores for ranking candidate clusterings, but most popular CVIs are built from Euclidean compactness and separation terms and so tend to favour compact, convex partitions. Their performance is known to degrade on non convex, irregular, or variable density data, where kernel transformations or alternative distance measures are typically used at the cost of additional tuning and computation. This paper introduces the Central Description Length (CDL) clustering validation index. CDL uses the observed within cluster compactness, the estimated cluster centers, and the estimated cluster covariances to compute a probabilistic upper bound on the description length associated with the unobservable true cluster centers. The bound condenses intra cluster compactness and centroid displacement into a single computable quantity and is evaluated on the partition produced by any clustering algorithm. The implementation uses only observable quantities (the data, the partition, the estimated centers, and the estimated covariances) and does not use ground truth labels. On synthetic benchmarks with non convex and arbitrary shape clusters, CDL-CVI selected the reference number of clusters more often and reached higher Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) values than the conventional CVIs we tested, without an additional kernel preprocessing stage. On image benchmarks (MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10) clustered from frozen unsupervised embeddings, CDL-CVI returned cluster numbers close to the reference class counts across K-means, DBSCAN, and spectral clustering in the reported trials.

Related papers

• A novel k-means clustering approach using two distance measures for Gaussian data [0.0]
  Clustering analysis is one of the best ways to find some clarity and structure within raw data.<n>We present a textitk-means clustering algorithm that takes both the within cluster distance (WCD) and the inter cluster distance (ICD) as the distance metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T22:36:14Z)
• K*-Means: A Parameter-free Clustering Algorithm [55.20132267309382]
  k*-means is a novel clustering algorithm that eliminates the need to set k or any other parameters.<n>It uses the minimum description length principle to automatically determine the optimal number of clusters, k*, by splitting and merging clusters.<n>We prove that k*-means is guaranteed to converge and demonstrate experimentally that it significantly outperforms existing methods in scenarios where k is unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T08:41:07Z)
• Fast Clustering of Categorical Big Data [1.8416014644193066]
  The K-Modes algorithm, developed for clustering categorical data, suffers from unreliable performances in clustering quality and clustering efficiency.<n>We investigate Bisecting K-Modes (BK-Modes), a successive bisecting process to find clusters, in examining how good the cluster centers out of the bisecting process will be.<n> Experimental results indicated good performances of BK-Modes both in the clustering quality and efficiency for large datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T22:19:08Z)
• Estimating the Optimal Number of Clusters in Categorical Data Clustering by Silhouette Coefficient [0.5939858158928473]
  This paper proposes an algorithm named k- SCC to estimate the optimal k in categorical data clustering.<n> Comparative experiments were conducted on both synthetic and real datasets to compare the performance of k- SCC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T14:29:11Z)
• Self-Supervised Graph Embedding Clustering [70.36328717683297]
  K-means one-step dimensionality reduction clustering method has made some progress in addressing the curse of dimensionality in clustering tasks. We propose a unified framework that integrates manifold learning with K-means, resulting in the self-supervised graph embedding framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T08:59:51Z)
• Revisiting Instance-Optimal Cluster Recovery in the Labeled Stochastic Block Model [85.51611950757643]
  We propose IAC (Instance-Adaptive Clustering), the first algorithm whose performance matches the instance-specific lower bounds both in expectation and with high probability.<n>IAC maintains an overall computational complexity of $ mathcalO(n, textpolylog(n) $, making it scalable and practical for large-scale problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T08:46:06Z)
• Rethinking k-means from manifold learning perspective [122.38667613245151]
  We present a new clustering algorithm which directly detects clusters of data without mean estimation. Specifically, we construct distance matrix between data points by Butterworth filter. To well exploit the complementary information embedded in different views, we leverage the tensor Schatten p-norm regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T03:01:41Z)
• Very Compact Clusters with Structural Regularization via Similarity and Connectivity [3.779514860341336]
  We propose an end-to-end deep clustering algorithm, i.e., Very Compact Clusters (VCC) for the general datasets. Our proposed approach achieves better clustering performance over most of the state-of-the-art clustering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T23:22:03Z)
• You Never Cluster Alone [150.94921340034688]
  We extend the mainstream contrastive learning paradigm to a cluster-level scheme, where all the data subjected to the same cluster contribute to a unified representation. We define a set of categorical variables as clustering assignment confidence, which links the instance-level learning track with the cluster-level one. By reparametrizing the assignment variables, TCC is trained end-to-end, requiring no alternating steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T14:59:59Z)
• Determinantal consensus clustering [77.34726150561087]
  We propose the use of determinantal point processes or DPP for the random restart of clustering algorithms. DPPs favor diversity of the center points within subsets. We show through simulations that, contrary to DPP, this technique fails both to ensure diversity, and to obtain a good coverage of all data facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T23:48:24Z)
• Scalable Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering [65.66407726145619]
  Existing scalable hierarchical clustering methods sacrifice quality for speed. We present a scalable, agglomerative method for hierarchical clustering that does not sacrifice quality and scales to billions of data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:58:35Z)
• Supervised Enhanced Soft Subspace Clustering (SESSC) for TSK Fuzzy Classifiers [25.32478253796209]
  Fuzzy c-means based clustering algorithms are frequently used for Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy classifier parameter estimation. This paper proposes a supervised enhanced soft subspace clustering (SESSC) algorithm, which considers simultaneously the within-cluster compactness, between-cluster separation, and label information in clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T19:39:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.