ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05567v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 01:28:36 GMT
• Title: ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense
• Abstract summary: We present ZERO-APT, a turn-based attacker-defender-judge framework.<n>For realism, ZERO-APT embeds a LLM Defender that consumes Sysmon telemetry and detects attacks in real time.<n>For consistency, three architectural mechanisms move causal consistency from unstable LLM reasoning into enforced system architecture.
• Score: 4.38737676286324
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM-driven automated penetration testing agents are typically evaluated against static targets that neither detect nor respond to attacks, so their behavior under intelligent defense remains untested. The causal consistency of multi-step attack chains likewise hinges on unstable LLM reasoning, and agent decisions remain opaque to human analysts. These three shortcomings, in realism, consistency, and auditability, are usually patched in isolation. We present ZERO-APT, a turn-based attacker-defender-judge framework that addresses them within a single architecture. For realism, ZERO-APT embeds a configurable LLM Defender that consumes Sysmon telemetry and detects attacks in real time, exposing the attacker to a live opponent rather than a passive target. For consistency, three architectural mechanisms move causal consistency from unstable LLM reasoning into enforced system architecture: separation of planning from execution, multi-dimensional ReAct feedback, and a hard-constraint-filtered action library. For auditability, a dedicated Judge agent adjudicates each round, maintains global state, and emits structured post-hoc CTI reports that make every decision traceable. We evaluate a Windows Server 2022 post-exploitation prototype across five scenarios with three Defender configurations. ZERO-APT reaches 79\% attack success rate (Aurora 22\%, PentestGPT 39\%), a Causal Consistency Score of 0.860 (Aurora 0.930, Claude Code 0.520), and end-to-end decision auditability through structured CTI reports. We release the benchmark to support evaluation of penetration agents under intelligent defense.

Related papers

• LMSM: LLM Security Framework Inspired by Linux Security Modules [56.93644694627783]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed with layered defenses, yet malicious prompts can still bypass them.<n>We present Language Model Security Modules (LMSM), a security framework that adapts the separation behind Linux Security Modules (LSM) to LLM serving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T12:13:05Z)
• CyberLLM: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Autonomous Detection and Guarded Response in Automotive Cybersecurity [22.68559728326395]
  CyberLLM is a framework that autonomously detects vulnerabilities and executes remediations under a formal, runtime safety guard.<n>Decision agents aggregates findings, tags them with a human-centric asset taxonomy, and selects a tiered response.<n>A symmetric attack pipeline generates and replays exploits so both sides can be exercised on the same scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T23:39:13Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Prompt Leaking Attacks in Real-World LLM-Based Applications [57.33208520608409]
  This paper presents a systematic study of prompt leaking in large language model (LLM)-based applications.<n>We find that over 80% of deployments leak system prompts under realistic adversarial queries.<n>We propose AREA, a practical defense that re-anchors the model's attention using an optimizable soft prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T04:20:00Z)
• AgentShield: Deception-based Compromise Detection for Tool-using LLM Agents [4.36595961990666]
  AgentShield is a deception-based detection framework.<n>It places three layers of traps inside the agent's tool interface.<n>It catches 90.7%-100% of such successful attacks, with zero false alarms on 485 normal-use tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T20:08:27Z)
• CHAINTRIX: A multi-pipeline LLM-augmented framework for automated smart-contract security auditing [3.8615905456206256]
  Chaintrix is an end-to-end auditing framework for smart-contract exploits.<n>It detects 86 of 120 high-severity vulnerabilities, with 25 audits scoring 100% recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:02:22Z)
• TwinGate: Stateful Defense against Decompositional Jailbreaks in Untraceable Traffic via Asymmetric Contrastive Learning [60.68349524623048]
  Decompositional jailbreaks pose a critical threat to large language models.<n>We present TwinGate, a stateful dual-encoder defense framework.<n>We construct a comprehensive dataset of over 3.62 million instructions spanning 8,600 distinct malicious intents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T13:44:01Z)
• Parallax: Why AI Agents That Think Must Never Act [0.0]
  This paper introduces Parallax, a paradigm for safe autonomous AI execution grounded in four principles.<n>We present OpenParallax, an open-source reference implementation in Go, and evaluate it usingAssume-Compromise Evaluation.<n>Across 280 adversarial test cases in nine attack categories, Parallax blocks 98.9% of attacks with zero false positives under its default configuration, and 100% of attacks under its maximum-security configuration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:20:48Z)
• Automated Self-Testing as a Quality Gate: Evidence-Driven Release Management for LLM Applications [51.56484100374058]
  We present an automated self-testing framework that introduces quality gates with evidence-based release decisions.<n>We evaluate the framework through a longitudinal case study of an internally deployed multi-agent conversational AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T20:44:15Z)
• AttriGuard: Defeating Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents via Causal Attribution of Tool Invocations [38.49666480491258]
  LLM agents are highly vulnerable to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI)<n>We propose a new paradigm, action-level causal attribution, which secures agents by asking why a particular tool call is produced.<n>We instantiate this paradigm with AttriGuard, a runtime defense based on parallel counterfactual tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T13:23:46Z)
• Gaming the Judge: Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought Can Undermine Agent Evaluation [76.5533899503582]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate agent performance.<n>We show this paradigm implicitly assumes that the agent's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning faithfully reflects both its internal reasoning and the underlying environment state.<n>We demonstrate that manipulated reasoning alone can inflate false positive rates of state-of-the-art VLM judges by up to 90% across 800 trajectories spanning diverse web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T06:07:43Z)
• STAC: When Innocent Tools Form Dangerous Chains to Jailbreak LLM Agents [38.755035623707656]
  This paper introduces Sequential Tool Attack Chaining (STAC), a novel multi-turn attack framework that exploits agent tool use.<n>We apply our framework to automatically generate and evaluate 483 STAC cases, featuring 1,352 sets of user-agent-environment interactions.<n>Our evaluations show that state-of-the-art LLM agents, including GPT-4.1, are highly vulnerable to STAC, with attack success rates (ASR) exceeding 90% in most cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T00:31:44Z)
• AegisLLM: Scaling Agentic Systems for Self-Reflective Defense in LLM Security [74.22452069013289]
  AegisLLM is a cooperative multi-agent defense against adversarial attacks and information leakage.<n>We show that scaling agentic reasoning system at test-time substantially enhances robustness without compromising model utility.<n> Comprehensive evaluations across key threat scenarios, including unlearning and jailbreaking, demonstrate the effectiveness of AegisLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T17:36:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.