Beyond Vector Similarity: A Structural Analysis of Graph-Augmented Retrieval for Industrial Knowledge Graphs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06003v1
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:56:57 GMT
- Title: Beyond Vector Similarity: A Structural Analysis of Graph-Augmented Retrieval for Industrial Knowledge Graphs
- Abstract summary: We compare eight retrieval architectures for aerospace supply chain intelligence.<n>We evaluate 23 queries across 10 categories intent and demonstrate that five query classes are structurally unreachable for vector retrieval.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) fails systematically on queries requiring structural reasoning over interconnected entities. We compare eight retrieval architectures for aerospace supply chain intelligence, progressing from text retrieval through graph traversal to graph computation. Using a 46-node knowledge graph with 64 typed edges, we evaluate 23 queries across 10 intent categories and demonstrate that five query classes are structurally unreachable for vector retrieval. Our central finding is the operator vocabulary thesis: the barrier to LLM-based graph reasoning is not model intelligence but the computational operators available as tools. An LLM Query Planner with 9 typed traversal primitives outperforms bespoke handlers (F1 = 0.632 vs. 0.472) while generalizing to unseen queries. Adding 6 graph computation tools, the LLM selectively adopts them for exactly the query categories where traversal fails. We also identify a measurement gap: entity-level F1 systematically underscores structural queries where comprehensive answers are correct.
Related papers
- SelfGraphRAG: Bridging the Supervision Gap in Graph-Based RAG with Synthetic QA Generation [10.08021023788401]
SelfGraphRAG is a framework that generates question-answer pairs directly from knowledge graph structure and uses them to train a query-conditioned graph retriever.<n>We show that SelfGraphRAG improves retrieval precision and downstream reasoning performance over embedding-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-25T20:18:05Z) - Query-Aware Flow Diffusion for Graph-Based RAG with Retrieval Guarantees [10.806910118253976]
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems leverage interconnected knowledge structures to capture complex relationships.<n>We propose Query-Aware Flow Diffusion RAG (QAFD-RAG), a training-free framework that dynamically adapts graph traversal to each query's holistic semantics.<n>QAFD-RAG recovers relevant subgraphs with high probability under mild signal-to-noise conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T08:53:34Z) - GraphWalk: Enabling Reasoning in Large Language Models through Tool-Based Graph Navigation [0.2999888908665658]
We present GraphWalk, a problem-agnostic, training-free, tool-based framework that allows off-the-shelf LLMs to reason through sequential graph navigation.<n>We evaluate whether models equipped with GraphWalk can compose these operations into correct multi-step reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T04:43:01Z) - GraphER: An Efficient Graph-Based Enrichment and Reranking Method for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [47.014599006114594]
GraphER is a graph-based enrichment and reranking method that captures multiple forms of proximity beyond semantic similarity.<n>It does not require a knowledge graph, allowing GraphER to integrate seamlessly with standard vector stores.<n> Experiments on multiple retrieval benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T01:30:22Z) - SAGE: Structure Aware Graph Expansion for Retrieval of Heterogeneous Data [47.930782177987446]
Retrieval-augmented question answering over heterogeneous corpora requires connected evidence across text, tables, and graph nodes.<n>Standard retriever-reader pipelines use flat similarity search over independently chunked text, missing multi-hop evidence chains across modalities.<n>We propose SAGE (Structure Aware Graph Expansion) framework that constructs a chunk-level graph offline using metadata-driven similarities with percentile-based pruning.<n>We instantiate the initial retriever using hybrid dense+sparse retrieval for implicit cross-modal corpora and SPARK (Structure Aware Planning Agent for Retrieval over Knowledge Graphs) an agentic retriever for explicit schema graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T23:57:19Z) - N2N-GQA: Noise-to-Narrative for Graph-Based Table-Text Question Answering Using LLMs [0.0]
Multi-hop question answering over hybrid table-text data requires retrieving and reasoning across multiple evidence pieces from large corpora.<n>Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines process documents as flat ranked lists, causing retrieval noise to obscure reasoning chains.<n>N2N-GQA is the first zeroshot framework for open-domain hybrid table-text QA that constructs dynamic evidence graphs from noisy retrieval outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T15:55:15Z) - TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z) - Enrich-on-Graph: Query-Graph Alignment for Complex Reasoning with LLM Enriching [61.824094419641575]
Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with hallucinations and factual errors in knowledge-intensive scenarios like knowledge graph question answering (KGQA)<n>We attribute this to the semantic gap between structured knowledge graphs (KGs) and unstructured queries, caused by inherent differences in their focuses and structures.<n>Existing methods usually employ resource-intensive, non-scalable reasoning on vanilla KGs, but overlook this gap.<n>We propose a flexible framework, Enrich-on-Graph (EoG), which leverages LLMs' prior knowledge to enrich KGs, bridge the semantic gap between graphs and queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T06:48:52Z) - Align-GRAG: Reasoning-Guided Dual Alignment for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation [79.75818239774952]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but still struggle with issues like hallucinations and outdated information.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses these issues by grounding LLM outputs in external knowledge with an Information Retrieval (IR) system.<n>We propose Align-GRAG, a novel reasoning-guided dual alignment framework in post-retrieval phrase.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T05:15:27Z) - Divide by Question, Conquer by Agent: SPLIT-RAG with Question-Driven Graph Partitioning [62.640169289390535]
SPLIT-RAG is a multi-agent RAG framework that addresses the limitations with question-driven semantic graph partitioning and collaborative subgraph retrieval.<n>The innovative framework first create Semantic Partitioning of Linked Information, then use the Type-Specialized knowledge base to achieve Multi-Agent RAG.<n>The attribute-aware graph segmentation manages to divide knowledge graphs into semantically coherent subgraphs, ensuring subgraphs align with different query types.<n>A hierarchical merging module resolves inconsistencies across subgraph-derived answers through logical verifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T06:44:34Z) - Integrating Graphs with Large Language Models: Methods and Prospects [68.37584693537555]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as frontrunners, showcasing unparalleled prowess in diverse applications.
Merging the capabilities of LLMs with graph-structured data has been a topic of keen interest.
This paper bifurcates such integrations into two predominant categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T07:59:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.