On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06164v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:36:22 GMT
• Title: On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations
• Abstract summary: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision.<n>We study key components of the PINO training pipeline, including architecture design, choice loss balancing, and collocation-point sampling strategy.<n>We find that several optimization pathologies previously identified in PINN training naturally arise in PINOs, including gradient conflicts and causal violation.
• Score: 3.41772976335063
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning. Despite this promise, how to train PINOs efficiently and robustly remains less well-understood than the training of either data-driven neural operators or physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). To bridge this gap, we examine key components of the PINO training pipeline, including architecture design, optimizer choice, loss balancing, and collocation-point sampling strategy. We study three representative operator backbones, Deep Operator Network (DeepONet), Fourier Neural Operator (FNO), and Continuous Vision Transformer (CViT), across five diverse parametric PDE systems. Our results show that CViT provides consistently strong and stable performance across the considered benchmarks. Beyond architecture, we find that several optimization pathologies previously identified in PINN training naturally arise in PINOs, including gradient conflicts and causal violation. We also find that mitigation algorithms developed for PINNs remain effective in the PINO setting. We further compare physics-informed and data-driven training under different data regimes, revealing that a carefully designed physics-informed training pipeline can match, and in some cases, outperform purely data-driven neural operators. Taken together, these findings provide a systematic empirical understanding of the optimization challenges in PINO training and inform a practical pipeline for efficient and robust physics-informed operator learning. Code and data are available at https://github.com/NanxiiChen/PI-CViT.

Related papers

• Data-Driven Deep MIMO Detection:Network Architectures and Generalization Analysis [50.20709408241935]
  This paper proposes inspecting the fully data-driven DeepSIC detection within a Network-of-MLPs architecture.<n>Within such an architecture, DeepSIC can be upgraded as a graph-based message-passing process using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)<n>GNNSIC achieves excellent expressivity comparable to DeepSIC with substantially fewer trainable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T04:38:51Z)
• DeepONet Augmented by Randomized Neural Networks for Efficient Operator Learning in PDEs [5.84093922354671]
  We propose RaNN-DeepONets, a hybrid architecture designed to balance accuracy and efficiency.<n>RaNN-DeepONets achieves comparable accuracy while reducing computational costs by orders of magnitude.<n>These results highlight the potential of RaNN-DeepONets as an efficient alternative for operator learning in PDE-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:05:29Z)
• Optimizing the Optimizer for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks [3.758814046658822]
  Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have revolutionized the computation PDE solutions by integrating partialmagnitude equations (PDEs) into the neural network's training process as soft constraints.<n>More, physics-informed networks (PIKANs) have also been effective and comparable in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T21:19:42Z)
• Evolutionary Optimization of Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Evo-PINN Frontiers and Opportunities [34.417531174682196]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are infused with mathematically expressible laws of nature into their training loss function.<n> PINNs provide advantages over purely data-driven models in limited-data regimes and present as a promising route towards Physical AI.<n>This work examines PINNs in terms of model optimization and generalization, shedding light on the need for new algorithmic advances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-11T15:45:11Z)
• Can Physics Informed Neural Operators Self Improve? [8.979310336973887]
  We explore the use of self-training for learning fast solvers for systems of partial differential equations (Eg: Neural Operators) In this work we show that self-training can be used to close this gap in performance. Specifically, FNOs, when trained exclusively with physics loss through self-training, approach 1.07x for Burgers and 1.02x for Darcy, compared to FNOs trained with both data and physics loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T10:15:09Z)
• Monte Carlo Neural PDE Solver for Learning PDEs via Probabilistic Representation [59.45669299295436]
  We propose a Monte Carlo PDE solver for training unsupervised neural solvers.<n>We use the PDEs' probabilistic representation, which regards macroscopic phenomena as ensembles of random particles.<n>Our experiments on convection-diffusion, Allen-Cahn, and Navier-Stokes equations demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T08:05:19Z)
• Intelligence Processing Units Accelerate Neuromorphic Learning [52.952192990802345]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have achieved orders of magnitude improvement in terms of energy consumption and latency. We present an IPU-optimized release of our custom SNN Python package, snnTorch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T15:44:08Z)
• Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture [77.59766598165551]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:24:31Z)
• Certified machine learning: A posteriori error estimation for physics-informed neural networks [0.0]
  PINNs are known to be robust for smaller training sets, derive better generalization problems, and are faster to train. We show that using PINNs in comparison with purely data-driven neural networks is not only favorable for training performance but allows us to extract significant information on the quality of the approximated solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T14:23:04Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations [55.406540167010014]
  PINO is the first hybrid approach incorporating data and PDE constraints at different resolutions to learn the operator. The resulting PINO model can accurately approximate the ground-truth solution operator for many popular PDE families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-06T03:41:34Z)
• Rectified Linear Postsynaptic Potential Function for Backpropagation in Deep Spiking Neural Networks [55.0627904986664]
  Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) usetemporal spike patterns to represent and transmit information, which is not only biologically realistic but also suitable for ultra-low-power event-driven neuromorphic implementation. This paper investigates the contribution of spike timing dynamics to information encoding, synaptic plasticity and decision making, providing a new perspective to design of future DeepSNNs and neuromorphic hardware systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T11:13:07Z)
• Understanding the Effects of Data Parallelism and Sparsity on Neural Network Training [126.49572353148262]
  We study two factors in neural network training: data parallelism and sparsity. Despite their promising benefits, understanding of their effects on neural network training remains elusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T10:49:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.