The Geography of Algorithmic Judgment: LLM Intermediaries, Place Identity, and Racial Steering in Housing Search

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06694v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 20:17:58 GMT
• Title: The Geography of Algorithmic Judgment: LLM Intermediaries, Place Identity, and Racial Steering in Housing Search
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly assuming an intermediary role in housing search.<n>We conduct a behavioral audit of seven open-weight and closed-source LLMs across four U.S. cities.<n>We find that steering is an emergent behavior of the model's interpretive license rather than primarily a static property.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly assuming an intermediary role in housing search through the integration of listing platforms within conversational interfaces, mediating access to information, search, and recommendations within urban settings. We expand on prior work on racial steering in LLMs by conducting a behavioral audit of seven open-weight and closed-source LLMs across four U.S. cities, testing location recommendations across three iterative prompting conditions that progressively add lifestyle preference context and reflect fair housing paired-testing methodologies. We find that steering is an emergent behavior of the model's interpretive license rather than primarily a static property. Steering results from the interaction of a user's identity, preference articulation, and the spatial logic that a model has internalized about learned representations of place, preference, and opportunity in a given city, and how different types of users relate to it. While steering was present, it was not uniform in direction or magnitude across evaluated conditions. Preference-conditioned testing often increased or reconfigured the number of models that exhibited steering behaviors relative to baseline conditions, suggesting that LLMs may interpret what the same housing preference means differently depending on the racial identity of the user. Our findings also demonstrate that the city is not a neutral testing unit for LLM evaluation in place-based sectors, and results from one local market cannot be assumed to generalize to another. Local and domain expertise will be required in the housing sector to ensure that legal and institutional commitments to fair housing are not undermined while adopting AI tools that mediate spatial access.

Related papers

• Do LLMs Know Your Neighborhood? Auditing LLM Priors for Neighborhood-Level Mobility Prediction and Structural Alignment [0.974918946585139]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a potential alternative by generating plausible mobility traces and predicting individual movement.<n>We evaluate zero-shot LLMs on Census Block Group-level mobility prediction across four U.S. metropolitan areas.<n>LLMs can partially recover aggregate mobility patterns from urban context, but their predictions should not be treated as structurally grounded.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T20:39:33Z)
• Spatial-Knowledge-Graph-Grounded LLM Agents for Neighborhood Livability Evaluation [0.0]
  Neighborhood livability is commonly assessed with static built-environment indicators, such as facility proximity, street connectivity, and access to public space.<n>This paper presents a prototype framework that uses a spatial knowledge graph (KG) and large language models (LLMs) to generate household schedules.<n>The framework offers an auditable way to connect spatial opportunity, household activity constraints, and resident-specific livability interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T16:05:57Z)
• Benchmarking LLMs for Community Governance Simulation with Life-history Narratives [46.86050402684712]
  Large language models (LLMs) are scalable to simulate human attitudes and behaviors at low cost.<n>We present an integrated research framework covering dataset, benchmark, algorithm, and system.<n>System integrates curriculum-LoRA into a closed-loop policy-evaluation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T15:48:49Z)
• Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space [0.0]
  This paper proposes a procedural governance framework that treats public-space AI systems as civic infrastructure.<n>The paper examines how disagreement, subgroup variation, bounded predictive scaling, and neutral preference judgments can inform municipal AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T23:59:37Z)
• Beyond Text-Dominance: Understanding Modality Preference of Omni-modal Large Language Models [73.89069781682032]
  We quantify modality preference of Native Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs)<n>Unlike the text-dominance'' of traditional VLMs, most OLLMs exhibit a pronounced visual preference.<n>Our work provides both a mechanistic understanding and a practical tool for building more trustworthy OLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T08:25:52Z)
• LiveCultureBench: a Multi-Agent, Multi-Cultural Benchmark for Large Language Models in Dynamic Social Simulations [63.478832978278014]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, yet evaluations focus primarily on task success rather than cultural appropriateness or evaluator reliability.<n>We introduce LiveCultureBench, a multi-cultural, dynamic benchmark that embeds LLMs as agents in a simulated town and evaluates them on both task completion and adherence to socio-cultural norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T15:04:16Z)
• Conversational Context Classification: A Representation Engineering Approach [0.0]
  A key challenge is accurately detecting when Large Language Models stray from expected conversational norms.<n>This paper outlines our experiment in exploring the use of Representation Engineering (RepE) and One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM)<n>By training OCSVM on in-context examples, we establish a robust boundary within the LLM's hidden state latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T06:47:35Z)
• Addressing the alignment problem in transportation policy making: an LLM approach [0.3499870393443268]
  A key challenge in transportation planning is that the collective preferences of heterogeneous travelers often diverge from the policies produced by model-driven decision tools.<n>Here, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can help inform and address this alignment problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T04:36:38Z)
• Social Welfare Function Leaderboard: When LLM Agents Allocate Social Welfare [87.06241096619112]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly entrusted with high-stakes decisions that affect human welfare.<n>We introduce the Social Welfare Function Benchmark, a dynamic simulation environment where an LLM acts as a sovereign allocator.<n>We evaluate 20 state-of-the-art LLMs and present the first leaderboard for social welfare allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T17:52:31Z)
• LocationReasoner: Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Site Selection Reasoning [9.738040108018835]
  We introduce LocationReasoner, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' reasoning abilities in the context of real-world site selection.<n>The benchmark covers carefully crafted queries of varying difficulty levels and is supported by a sandbox environment with in-house tools for constraint-based location search.<n>Extensive evaluations on real-world site selection data from Boston, New York, and Tampa reveal that state-of-the-art reasoning models offer limited improvement over their non-reasoning predecessors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T16:23:56Z)
• MoRE-LLM: Mixture of Rule Experts Guided by a Large Language Model [54.14155564592936]
  We propose a Mixture of Rule Experts guided by a Large Language Model (MoRE-LLM)<n>MoRE-LLM steers the discovery of local rule-based surrogates during training and their utilization for the classification task.<n>LLM is responsible for enhancing the domain knowledge alignment of the rules by correcting and contextualizing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T11:09:21Z)
• EXPRESS: An LLM-Generated Explainable Property Valuation System with Neighbor Imputation [9.741952588343086]
  We propose an LLM- Generated EXplainable PRopErty valuation SyStem with neighbor imputation called EXPRESS.<n>It provides the customizable missing value imputation technique, and addresses the opaqueness of prediction.<n>We generate feature-wise explanations to provide users with a more intuitive understanding of the prediction results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T03:49:52Z)
• Diverging Preferences: When do Annotators Disagree and do Models Know? [92.24651142187989]
  We develop a taxonomy of disagreement sources spanning 10 categories across four high-level classes. We find that the majority of disagreements are in opposition with standard reward modeling approaches. We develop methods for identifying diverging preferences to mitigate their influence on evaluation and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:32:22Z)
• On the steerability of large language models toward data-driven personas [98.9138902560793]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate biased responses where the opinions of certain groups and populations are underrepresented. Here, we present a novel approach to achieve controllable generation of specific viewpoints using LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T19:01:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.