An Expanded Synthetic Conversation Dataset for Multi-Turn Smishing Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06879v1
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 03:46:36 GMT
- Title: An Expanded Synthetic Conversation Dataset for Multi-Turn Smishing Detection
- Abstract summary: We present COVA-X, an expanded dataset of 10,985 conversations spanning eight elder-targeted scam categories.<n>Longformer now surpasses XGBoost on all evaluation metrics, achieving 79.71% accuracy and 0.7786 macro F1 compared with 78.43% and 0.7563 for XGBoost.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Our prior work introduced COVA, a synthetically generated multi-turn conversational smishing dataset of 3,201 labeled conversations, establishing baseline detection benchmarks across eight models. While XGBoost with TF-IDF features achieved the best performance, with 72.5\% accuracy and 0.691 macro F1, transformer models underperformed, which was attributed to input truncation and insufficient training data. We present COVA-X, an expanded dataset of 10,985 conversations spanning eight elder-targeted scam categories, produced by an improved generation pipeline addressing contamination, label mismatch, stage-direction bleed, and prompt-design failures from the first iteration. Retraining all classifiers on the expanded dataset yields the central finding of this work: Longformer now surpasses XGBoost on all evaluation metrics, achieving 79.71\% accuracy and 0.7786 macro F1 compared with 78.43\% and 0.7563 for XGBoost. This directly confirms that transformer models require larger conversational corpora to realize their contextual advantages. We additionally document a quality life-cycle including a 12.7$\times$ improvement in label correction rate, from 49.8\% to 3.9\%, an architectural intervention reducing virtual-kidnapping artifact rates from 67.1\% to 46.5\%, and a per-scam-type outcome analysis showing that scam categories modulate results in mechanism-consistent ways. A pre/post-cleanup sensitivity analysis confirms that dataset refinement recovers genuine label-relevant signal across all three classifier architectures.
Related papers
- Domain-Specific Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models [0.0]
Large language models generate fluent text that can contain unfaithful claims.<n>We present a multi-signal detection pipeline combining fine-tuned DeBERTa-v3 classification, Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout uncertainty quantification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-10T17:45:36Z) - ToolLoop: Closed-Loop Tool-Use Data Synthesis via Decomposed Generation and Dynamic Self-Feedback [10.658946043856124]
High-quality tool-use data is critical for training language models to interact effectively with external tools.<n>We propose ToolLoop, a closed-loop framework that decomposes synthesis into three progressive stages.<n>Dynamic self-feedback iteratively guides the model toward high-quality generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-08T17:26:35Z) - Scaling Closed-Loop Feature Channel Configuration with LLMs [48.83701310501069]
The analysis covers 2000 generated candidates from 8 complete cycles, yielding 462 verified CIFAR-100 evaluations after task and metadata filtering.<n>The best model reaches 0.3676 with 11.8M parameters, compared with an early high-performing model at 0.3144 with 166.5M parameters.<n>Non-power-of-two channel widths occur in 41.8% of verified candidates, and the strongest models share structured channelallocation patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T22:31:53Z) - Efficient Visual Pointing for Embodied AI:Agent-Driven Data Synthesis, Cross-Block Attention, and Iterative Correction [55.11480729304395]
We describe our PointArena 2026 solution, which achieves 77.2% overall accuracy and ranks second on the benchmark.<n>The ap proach targets three failure modes. First, agent-driven syn thesis builds large semantic and anchor-relative candidate pools.<n>Second, a determinis tic steerable-data pipeline creates a verified 10,000-sample main set, plus reserve samples, using masks, templates, and path verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T06:39:03Z) - How Much Capacity Does EEG Denoising Need? Ultra-Compact Networks reveal Benchmark Saturation and Metric-Utility Gap [0.0]
Deep learning EEG denoising architectures have scaled from tens of thousands to tens of millions of parameters, yet no prior study has isolated model capacity as the experimental variable.<n>We address both gaps by fixing architecture, loss, data split, and training recipe while sweeping only channel width from 1.05K to 40.26K parameters in a minimal depthwiseseparable convolutional U-Net.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-07T12:17:25Z) - Models Can Model, But Can't Bind: Structured Grounding in Text-to-Optimization [54.749573452394664]
We find that accuracy collapses as instance data grows, even when the formulation itself is simple.<n>We address this via a simple inference-time approach, BIND, which externalizes numeric data to structured files so the model binds data rather than from prompt prompt.<n>We validate our hypothesis by finetuning a model exclusively on binding and show that it outperforms end-to-end SFT and RL across three structurally distinct optimization categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T21:25:41Z) - Feature-Augmented Transformers for Robust AI-Text Detection Across Domains and Generators [0.10923877073891443]
We train transformer-based detectors on HC3 PLUS and calibrate a single decision threshold by maximising balanced accuracy on held-out validation.<n>We evaluate in-domain on HC3 PLUS, under cross-dataset transfer to the multi-domain, multi-generator M4 benchmark, and on the external AI-Text-Detection-Pile.<n>Our best model (DeBERTa-v3-base+FeatAttn) achieves 85.9% balanced accuracy on M4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T16:52:26Z) - AnomalyGen: Enhancing Log-Based Anomaly Detection with Code-Guided Data Augmentation [42.87177529900358]
AnomalyGen is a novel framework that augments training data by synthesizing labeled log sequences from source code.<n> Evaluations on HDFS and Zookeeper across 12 diverse anomaly detection models show AnomalyGen consistently improves performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T07:24:43Z) - Pioneer Agent: Continual Improvement of Small Language Models in Production [6.452260317191361]
Small language models are attractive for production deployment due to their low cost, fast inference, and ease of specialization.<n>We present Pioneer Agent, a closed-loop system that automates the process of adapting small language models to a specific task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-10T18:13:09Z) - MinerU2.5-Pro: Pushing the Limits of Data-Centric Document Parsing at Scale [92.09717763663873]
We present MinerU2.5-Pro, which advances the state of the art purely through data engineering and training strategy design.<n>At its core is a Data Engine co-designed around coverage, informativeness, and annotation accuracy.<n>We show that MinerU2.5-Pro achieves 95.69 on OmniDocBench v1.6, improving over the same-architecture baseline by 2.71 points and surpassing all existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T15:44:18Z) - Brevity Constraints Reverse Performance Hierarchies in Language Models [0.0]
On 7.7% of benchmark problems, larger language models underperform smaller ones by 28.4 percentage points despite 10-100x more parameters.<n>We identify the mechanism as spontaneous scale-dependent verbosity that introduces errors through overelaboration.<n>Our results establish that maximizing large model performance requires scale-aware prompt engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T06:47:41Z) - Do Generative Metrics Predict YOLO Performance? An Evaluation Across Models, Augmentation Ratios, and Dataset Complexity [43.338311770275745]
We present a controlled evaluation of synthetic augmentation for YOLOv11 across three single-class detection regimes.<n>We benchmark six GAN-, diffusion-, and hybrid-based generators over augmentation ratios from 10% to 150% of the real training split.<n>For each dataset-generator-augmentation configuration, we compute pre-training dataset metrics under a matched-size bootstrap protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T03:02:36Z) - SEER: Spectral Entropy Encoding of Roles for Context-Aware Attention-Based Design Pattern Detection [0.0]
This paper presents an upgraded version of our prior method Context Is All You Need for detecting Gang of Four (GoF) design patterns from source code.<n> SEER addresses these limitations with two principled additions: (i) a spectral-entropy role encoder that derives per-member role embeddings from the Laplacian spectrum of each class's interaction graph, and (ii) a time-weighted calling context that assigns empirically calibrated duration priors to method categories.<n>We evaluate SEER on PyDesignNet (1,832 files, 35,000 sequences, 23 GoF patterns) and observe consistent gains over our previous system
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T19:13:40Z) - A Comprehensive Forecasting-Based Framework for Time Series Anomaly Detection: Benchmarking on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) [0.0]
Time series anomaly detection is critical for modern digital infrastructures.<n>We present a forecasting-based framework unifying classical methods with deep learning architectures.<n>We conduct the first complete evaluation on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T08:31:42Z) - Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models [76.79744000300363]
We find significant performance degradation on novel or incomplete data.<n>These findings highlight the reliance on recall over rigorous logical inference.<n>This paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed as Math-RoB, that exploits hallucinations triggered by missing information to expose reasoning gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T15:36:06Z) - Towards a Competitive End-to-End Speech Recognition for CHiME-6 Dinner
Party Transcription [73.66530509749305]
In this paper, we argue that, even in difficult cases, some end-to-end approaches show performance close to the hybrid baseline.
We experimentally compare and analyze CTC-Attention versus RNN-Transducer approaches along with RNN versus Transformer architectures.
Our best end-to-end model based on RNN-Transducer, together with improved beam search, reaches quality by only 3.8% WER abs. worse than the LF-MMI TDNN-F CHiME-6 Challenge baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-22T19:08:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.