From Custom Logic to APIs: Understanding and Recommending API Replacement Refactorings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06912v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 05:18:32 GMT
• Title: From Custom Logic to APIs: Understanding and Recommending API Replacement Refactorings
• Abstract summary: API replacement, which replaces custom logic with API calls, remains underexplored.<n>We conduct the first empirical study of API replacements by mining 166,299 commits across six open-source Java projects.<n>We propose AKIRA, a hybrid framework that integrates a pattern-aware knowledge base to assess the practical feasibility of recommending API replacements.
• Score: 7.207967097886866
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Software refactoring is essential for maintaining code quality. However, API replacement refactoring, which replaces custom logic with API calls, remains underexplored. Existing refactoring tools provide limited support for detecting such opportunities because they rely on predefined templates and have difficulty capturing complex, multi-statement semantic equivalents. To address this limitation, we conduct the first empirical study of API replacement refactorings by mining 166,299 commits across six open-source Java projects and manually analyzing a curated subset of 1,800 commits, from which we identify 366 validated instances to characterize their scope, categories, and recurring patterns. Based on these insights, we propose AKIRA (Adaptive Knowledge Discovery and Retrieval), a hybrid framework that integrates pattern-deterministic heuristics with a refactoring-aware knowledge base to assess the practical feasibility of recommending API replacement refactorings. Our evaluation shows that AKIRA achieves 90% recall and 88% precision on a manually curated dataset. Furthermore, on the external RETIWA dataset, AKIRA significantly improves the state of the art by increasing recall from 21% to 81% and precision from 40% to 78%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining static pattern matching with semantic reasoning to support the automation of recommending complex API replacement refactorings.

Related papers

• RESTOR: Automated Test Oracle Generation for RESTful APIs via Reinforcement Learning [21.927343858709122]
  Restor is a framework that generates executable test assertions from a single observed request-response pair in a black-box setting.<n>We evaluate Restor on an industrial dataset comprising over 2,300 API traces across 246 real-world services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T03:20:28Z)
• SWE-Refactor: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Real-World LLM-Based Code Refactoring [20.694251041823097]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted wide interest for tackling software engineering tasks.<n>Existing benchmarks commonly suffer from three shortcomings.<n>SWE-Refactor comprises 1,099 developer-written, behavior-preserving LLMs mined from 18 Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T16:36:29Z)
• OpenOneRec Technical Report [99.17075873619352]
  OneRec series has successfully unified the fragmented recommendation pipeline into an end-to-end generative framework.<n>OneRec Foundation (1.7B and 8B), a family of models establishing new state-of-the-art (SOTA) results across all tasks in RecIF-Bench.<n>When transferred to the Amazon benchmark, our models surpass the strongest baselines with an average 26.8% improvement in Recall@10 across 10 diverse datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T10:15:53Z)
• TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
  TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Refactoring $\neq$ Bug-Inducing: Improving Defect Prediction with Code Change Tactics Analysis [54.361900378970134]
  Just-in-time defect prediction (JIT-DP) aims to predict the likelihood of code changes resulting in software defects at an early stage.<n>Prior research has largely ignored code during both the evaluation and methodology phases, despite its prevalence.<n>We propose Code chAnge Tactics (CAT) analysis to categorize code and its propagation, which improves labeling accuracy in the JIT-Defects4J dataset by 13.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T23:29:25Z)
• RefModel: Detecting Refactorings using Foundation Models [2.2670483018110366]
  We investigate the viability of using foundation models for detection, implemented in a tool named RefModel.<n>We evaluate Phi4-14B, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet on a dataset of 858 single-operation transformations applied to artificially generated Java programs.<n>In real-world settings, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro jointly identified 97% of all transformations, surpassing the best-performing static-analysis-based tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T14:20:56Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• Automated Unit Test Refactoring [10.847400457238423]
  Test smells arise from poor design practices and insufficient domain knowledge.<n>We propose UTRefactor, a context-enhanced, LLM-based framework for automatic test in Java projects.<n>We evaluate UTRefactor on 879 tests from six open-source Java projects, reducing the number of test smells from 2,375 to 265, achieving an 89% reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T08:42:29Z)
• Together We Go Further: LLMs and IDE Static Analysis for Extract Method Refactoring [9.882903340467815]
  Long methods that encapsulate multiple responsibilities within a single method are challenging to maintain. Large Language Models (LLMs) have been trained on large code corpora. LLMs are very effective for giving expert suggestions, yet they are unreliable: up to 76.3% of the suggestions are hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T05:01:03Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Improve REST API Testing [51.284096009803406]
  RESTGPT takes as input an API specification, extracts machine-interpretable rules, and generates example parameter values from natural-language descriptions in the specification. Our evaluations indicate that RESTGPT outperforms existing techniques in both rule extraction and value generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T19:53:23Z)
• Toward the Automatic Classification of Self-Affirmed Refactoring [22.27416971215152]
  Self-Affirmed Refactoring (SAR) was introduced to explore how developers document their activities in commit messages. We propose a two-step approach to first identify whether a commit describes developer-related events, then to classify it according to the common quality improvement categories. Our model is able to accurately classify commits, outperforming the pattern-based random approaches, and allowing the discovery of 40 more relevant SAR patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T18:35:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.