Learning Explicit Behavioral Models with Adaptive Questions and World-Model Probes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07127v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:34:55 GMT
• Title: Learning Explicit Behavioral Models with Adaptive Questions and World-Model Probes
• Abstract summary: Explicit Behavioral Model (ESBM) represents behavior through typed predicates, weighted rules, bounded options and mechanism memory.<n> adaptive questions and active world-model probes convert score failures, QA errors and transition-prediction errors into constraints for local ESBM edits.<n>ESBM learns high-scoring policies while producing explicit answers and executable mechanism predictions.
• Score: 33.45606616891203
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Interactive agents trained only against task return can achieve high scores while failing to represent the mechanisms that make their actions succeed. This makes brittle behavior difficult to diagnose and limits adaptation when environment dynamics change. Existing LLM reflection and policy-code repair can revise behavior from failed trajectories, but questions and world-understanding tests are usually used only after training. We introduce an Explicit Symbolic Behavioral Model (ESBM), a trainable behavioral model that couples task performance with evidence-grounded question answering and executable mechanism prediction. An ESBM represents behavior through typed predicates, weighted rules, bounded options and mechanism memory; the mechanism layer predicts symbolic events, object changes, rewards and terminal consequences under action interventions. After each rollout, adaptive questions and active world-model probes convert score failures, QA errors and transition-prediction errors into constraints for local ESBM edits. Candidate models are selected by a multi-criterion rule that jointly evaluates task score, answerability and active world-model consistency. Under the tested Atari-style protocols, ESBM learns high-scoring policies while producing explicit answers and executable mechanism predictions, indicating that adaptive questions can serve as both training pressure and reusable benchmarks for mechanistic policy learning in this setting.

Related papers

• OLIVIA: Online Learning via Inference-time Action Adaptation for Decision Making in LLM ReAct Agents [74.20327254615854]
  Large language model agents interleave reasoning, action selection, and observation to solve sequential decision-making tasks.<n>Existing inference-time adaptation methods for LLM agents mainly rely on prompting or retrieval.<n>We propose OLIVIA, an inference-time action adaptation framework for ReAct-style agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T19:28:20Z)
• AGWM: Affordance-Grounded World Models for Environments with Compositional Prerequisites [18.635313325437664]
  We propose AGWM (Affordance-Grounded World Model), which learns an abstract affordance structure represented as a DAG of prerequisite dependencies to explicitly track the dynamic executability of actions.<n> Experiments on game-based simulated environments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by achieving lower multi-step prediction error, better generalization to novel configurations, and improved interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T18:46:44Z)
• Reshaping Action Error Distributions for Reliable Vision-Language-Action Models [69.38615670891038]
  In robotic manipulation, vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for learning generalizable and scalable robot policies.<n>We focus on continuous-action VLA models and move beyond conventional MSE-based regression by reshaping action error distributions during training.<n>We evaluate our approaches across standard, few-shot, and noisy settings on multiple representative VLA architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T05:37:09Z)
• On the Paradoxical Interference between Instruction-Following and Task Solving [50.75960598434753]
  Instruction following aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent by specifying explicit constraints on how tasks should be performed.<n>We reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon: instruction following can paradoxically interfere with LLMs' task-solving capability.<n>We propose a metric, SUSTAINSCORE, to quantify the interference of instruction following with task solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T17:48:56Z)
• Grounded Test-Time Adaptation for LLM Agents [75.62784644919803]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents struggle to generalize to novel and complex environments.<n>We propose two strategies for adapting LLM agents by leveraging environment-specific information available during deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T22:24:35Z)
• A Multi-Component Reward Function with Policy Gradient for Automated Feature Selection with Dynamic Regularization and Bias Mitigation [0.0]
  Static feature exclusion strategies fail to prevent bias when hidden dependencies influence the model predictions.<n>We develop a reinforcement learning framework that integrates bias mitigation and automated feature selection within a single learning process.<n>We aim to provide a flexible and generalizable way to select features in environments where predictors are correlated and biases can inadvertently re-emerge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T22:45:38Z)
• From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
  Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z)
• Model Editing as a Double-Edged Sword: Steering Agent Ethical Behavior Toward Beneficence or Harm [57.00627691433355]
  We frame agent behavior steering as a model editing task, which we term Behavior Editing.<n>We introduce BehaviorBench, a benchmark grounded in psychological moral theories.<n>We demonstrate that Behavior Editing can be used to promote ethical and benevolent behavior or, conversely, to induce harmful or malicious behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T16:51:51Z)
• REAL: Reading Out Transformer Activations for Precise Localization in Language Model Steering [26.428347164111926]
  Inference-time steering aims to alter a large language model's responses without changing its parameters.<n>Existing approaches often rely on simplistic cues or ad hoc generalizations.<n>We introduce REAL, a framework for identifying behavior-relevant modules in Transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T02:16:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.