Entanglement in the Quantum Volunteer's Dilemma
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08227v1
- Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 15:31:16 GMT
- Title: Entanglement in the Quantum Volunteer's Dilemma
- Abstract summary: We study a quantum version of the Volunteer's Dilemma game theory.<n>We find that maximal entanglement is not required to sustain symmetric Nash equilibria.<n>This characterization is directly relevant for implementations on resource-constrained quantum devices.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: A well-known model in game theory, the Volunteer's Dilemma describes a group of $n$ players who decide whether to volunteer for a collective benefit at a personal cost, or to abstain and risk forfeiting the benefit altogether. A quantum version of this dilemma, developed within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework, allows each player to manipulate one qubit of a shared entangled state, leading to symmetric Nash equilibria with higher expected payoffs than in the classical game. Existing analyses, however, assume maximal entanglement. Within the same framework, we introduce a generalized Quantum Volunteer's Dilemma with a tunable entanglement parameter $γ$ and study the extent to which equilibrium behavior depends on the level of entanglement. We derive explicit conditions relating $γ$, the number of players, and the players' strategies under which symmetric Nash equilibria exist, focusing on two canonical strategy profiles: one for $2\leq n\leq 9$, and one for even $n$. We find that maximal entanglement is not required to sustain symmetric equilibria. Instead, equilibrium behavior persists above a threshold value, which we compute analytically in both cases. We also demonstrate that the threshold value directly depends on system size. This characterization is directly relevant for implementations on resource-constrained quantum devices, where entanglement is inherently limited.
Related papers
- Parametric Open Source Games [78.29352305480285]
We introduce parametric open-source games, a continuous analogue of program equilibria.<n>We derive an exact coupling threshold at which selfish gradient ascent in symmetric $2times2$ games switches from defection toward cooperation.<n>We extend the framework to a neural semantics class whose first-order cooperation condition is governed by the ratio of cross-player to self-player sensitivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T14:14:24Z) - Asymmetric Nash Seeking via Best Response Maps: Global Linear Convergence and Robustness to Inexact Reaction Models [0.0]
Nash equilibria provide a principled framework for modeling interactions in multi-agent decision-making and control.<n>This letter studies a class of asymmetric-information two-player constrained games with decoupled feasible sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T18:45:56Z) - Learning Equilibria in Matching Games with Bandit Feedback [2.5015086558362247]
We investigate the problem of learning an equilibrium in a generalized two-sided matching market.<n>We propose a UCB algorithm in which agents form preferences and select actions based on optimistic estimates of the game payoffs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T10:15:51Z) - Quantum Volunteer's Dilemma [0.210674772139335]
We introduce a quantum variant of the classical volunteer's dilemma.
We show that the quantum volunteer's dilemma possesses symmetric Nash equilibria with larger expected payoffs.
Our findings reveal distinct dynamics in volunteer's dilemma scenarios when players adhere to quantum rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T15:19:41Z) - Quantum Cournot model based on general entanglement operator [0.0]
The relationship between the degree of entanglement of the initial state of the game and the payoff values in Nash equilibrium is ambiguous.<n>In a quantum duopoly based on the initial state of a game that depends on one squeezing parameter, the maximum possible payoff in Nash equilibrium cannot be reached when the value of the phase parameter is greater than zero.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T08:24:17Z) - On Tractable $Φ$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games [53.212133025684224]
We study tractable $Phi$-equilibria in non-concave games.<n>We show that when $Phi$ is finite, there exists an efficient uncoupled learning algorithm that converges to the corresponding $Phi$-equilibria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T01:51:30Z) - Optimistic Policy Gradient in Multi-Player Markov Games with a Single
Controller: Convergence Beyond the Minty Property [89.96815099996132]
We develop a new framework to characterize optimistic policy gradient methods in multi-player games with a single controller.
Our approach relies on a natural generalization of the classical Minty property that we introduce, which we anticipate to have further applications beyond Markov games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T11:34:10Z) - Differentiable Arbitrating in Zero-sum Markov Games [59.62061049680365]
We study how to perturb the reward in a zero-sum Markov game with two players to induce a desirable Nash equilibrium, namely arbitrating.
The lower level requires solving the Nash equilibrium under a given reward function, which makes the overall problem challenging to optimize in an end-to-end way.
We propose a backpropagation scheme that differentiates through the Nash equilibrium, which provides the gradient feedback for the upper level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-20T16:05:04Z) - Learning Correlated Equilibria in Mean-Field Games [62.14589406821103]
We develop the concepts of Mean-Field correlated and coarse-correlated equilibria.
We show that they can be efficiently learnt in emphall games, without requiring any additional assumption on the structure of the game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T08:31:46Z) - Multi-Leader Congestion Games with an Adversary [0.5914780964919123]
We study a multi-leader single-follower congestion game where multiple users (leaders) choose one resource out of a set of resources.
We show that pure Nash equilibria may fail to exist and therefore, we consider approximate equilibria instead.
We show how to compute efficiently a best approximate equilibrium, that is, with smallest possible $alpha$ among all $alpha$-approximate equilibria of the given instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-14T14:47:43Z) - Sample-Efficient Learning of Stackelberg Equilibria in General-Sum Games [78.65798135008419]
It remains vastly open how to learn the Stackelberg equilibrium in general-sum games efficiently from samples.
This paper initiates the theoretical study of sample-efficient learning of the Stackelberg equilibrium in two-player turn-based general-sum games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T05:11:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.