Rethinking Embodied Navigation via Relational Inductive Bias
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10348v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:57:34 GMT
- Title: Rethinking Embodied Navigation via Relational Inductive Bias
- Abstract summary: We propose DB-Nav, a framework that reshapes the search space via dual relational biases.<n>It factorizes target-centric relations into an Activation Bias and an Inhibition Bias.<n>It significantly outperforms existing methods in success rate (SR) and Success weighted by Path Length (SPL)
- Score: 53.72276435022479
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Object navigation requires an agent to locate a target in an unknown environment through visual observations. Existing methods typically rely on open-vocabulary detectors or vision-language models (VLMs) to answer where to search, but often overlook what not to trust - which semantic cues are unreliable. Open-vocabulary perception is prone to systematic misleading evidence: false positives, outdated static priors, and repeated failed exploration due to lack of embodied verification, which contaminates mapping and decision-making. Such errors are rooted in structured object relations in real-world scenes. To address this, we propose DB-Nav, a framework that reshapes the search space via dual relational biases. It factorizes target-centric relations into an Activation Bias (propagates contextual evidence) and an Inhibition Bias (suppresses unreliable regions via perceptual confusion and action-level falsification). These biases are unified into a Relational Activation-Inhibition Exploration Graph that modulates frontier exploration values using online observations and failed accesses. Experiments on ObjectNav benchmarks show that DB-Nav significantly outperforms existing methods in success rate (SR) and Success weighted by Path Length (SPL), offering a lightweight, interpretable, and robust navigation framework without costly online VLM reasoning.
Related papers
- Dual-Layer Semantic-Spatial Belief Mapping for Aerial Object Goal Navigation [42.980962327113495]
Aerial Object Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) requires an unmanned aerial vehicle to locate a described target in an unknown outdoor environment.<n>Vision-language models (VLMs) can interpret open-ended target descriptions and visual observations, but their frame-level outputs are often noisy, sparse, and spatially transient.<n>We propose AeroBelief, a dual-layer semantic-spatial belief mapping framework that transforms transient VLM observations into persistent spatial guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-08T02:47:49Z) - Map the Possibilities: Spatial Belief Fields for Language-Goal Aerial Navigation [49.03955946482723]
We introduce SBFNav, a closed-loop navigation framework centered on a language- conditioned Spatial Belief Field.<n>Unlike ego-centric maps that primarily record what has been observed, SBF rep- resents a task-conditioned distribution over plausible target locations.<n>SBFNav selects the goal that best aligns with the instruction and observations as a met- ric waypoint for control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-05T03:11:01Z) - Path-level Hindsight Instructions for Semantic Exploration in Vision-Language Navigation [49.96273402030084]
We introduce Phi-Nav, a unified on-policy framework that leverages hindsight reasoning to align instructions with the agent's actual exploratory journey.<n>Phi-Nav bridges the critical semantic supervision gap inherent in on-policy methods, transforming semantically unlabeled movement into dense training signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-02T06:11:07Z) - ConsistNav: Closing the Action Consistency Gap in Zero-Shot Object Navigation with Semantic Executive Control [20.155796585668607]
ConsistNav is a training-free zero-shot ObjectNav framework built around a semantic executive composed of three coordinated modules.<n>We conduct experiments on HM3D and MP3D, where ConsistNav achieves results and improves SR by 11.4% and SPL by 7.9% over the controlled baseline on MP3D.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T01:51:45Z) - SR-Nav: Spatial Relationships Matter for Zero-shot Object Goal Navigation [23.52929533412924]
Zero-shot object-goal navigation aims to find target objects in unseen environments using only egocentric observation.<n>Recent methods leverage foundation models' comprehension and reasoning capabilities to enhance navigation performance.<n>We propose Spatial Relation-aware Navigation (SR-Nav), a framework that models both observed and experience-based spatial relationships to enhance both perception and planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T03:09:32Z) - Nipping the Drift in the Bud: Retrospective Rectification for Robust Vision-Language Navigation [26.497706746023407]
BudVLN is an online framework that learns from on-policy rollouts by constructing supervision to match the current state distribution.<n>BudVLN consistently mitigates distribution shift and achieves state-of-the-art performance in both Success Rate and SPL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T03:36:27Z) - DSCD-Nav: Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate for Object Navigation [63.439158093945956]
We propose Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate Navigation (DSCD-Nav) to replace one-shot scoring with stance-based cross-checking and evidence-aware arbitration.<n> Experiments on HM3Dv1, HM3Dv2, and MP3D demonstrate consistent improvements in success and path efficiency while reducing exploration redundancy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T08:47:55Z) - ReasonNavi: Human-Inspired Global Map Reasoning for Zero-Shot Embodied Navigation [53.95797153529148]
Embodied agents often struggle with efficient navigation because they rely primarily on partial egocentric observations.<n>We introduce ReasonNavi, a human-inspired framework that operationalizes this reason-then-act paradigm by coupling Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with deterministic planners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T19:09:20Z) - Think Locally, Explain Globally: Graph-Guided LLM Investigations via Local Reasoning and Belief Propagation [5.191980417814362]
LLM agents excel when environments are mostly static and the needed information fits in a model's context window.<n>ReAct-style agents are especially brittle in this regime.<n>We propose EoG, a framework in which an LLM performs bounded local evidence mining and labeling (cause vs symptom) while a deterministic controller manages, state, and belief propagation to compute a minimal explanatory frontier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T17:27:19Z) - VAR: Visual Attention Reasoning via Structured Search and Backtracking [49.427842994857635]
We introduce Visual Attention Reasoning, a framework that recasts grounded reasoning as a structured search.<n> VAR decomposes the reasoning process into two key stages: traceable evidence grounding and search-based chain-of-thought.<n>We show that our 7B model, VAR-7B, sets a new state-of-the-art on a comprehensive suite of hallucination and safety benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T13:18:44Z) - RSRNav: Reasoning Spatial Relationship for Image-Goal Navigation [57.197881161006904]
Recent image-goal navigation (ImageNav) methods learn a perception-action policy by separately capturing semantic features of the goal and egocentric images.<n>We propose RSRNav, a simple yet effective method that reasons spatial relationships between the goal and current observations as navigation guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-25T00:22:17Z) - Anticipating the Unseen Discrepancy for Vision and Language Navigation [63.399180481818405]
Vision-Language Navigation requires the agent to follow natural language instructions to reach a specific target.
The large discrepancy between seen and unseen environments makes it challenging for the agent to generalize well.
We propose Unseen Discrepancy Anticipating Vision and Language Navigation (DAVIS) that learns to generalize to unseen environments via encouraging test-time visual consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-10T19:04:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.