FOGO: Forgetting-aware Orthogonalization Optimizer
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10406v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:30:49 GMT
- Title: FOGO: Forgetting-aware Orthogonalization Optimizer
- Abstract summary: We argue that forgetting is not confined to continual learning but is a general optimization phenomenon.<n>We introduce FOGO, a scalable gradient that continuously detects and resolves interference across both regimes.<n> FOGO consistently improves convergence and knowledge retention, outperforming Adam and Muon.
- Score: 21.464454254585387
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We argue that forgetting is not confined to continual learning but is a general optimization phenomenon: during standard training, dominant mini-batch gradients suppress rare but useful update directions, causing short-term forgetting at every step. When such knowledge is never revisited, these losses compound into long-term forgetting-the classical failure mode of continual learning. We introduce FOGO, a scalable optimizer that continuously detects and resolves gradient interference across both regimes. FOGO spectrally orthogonalizes momentum updates to prevent dominant directions from monopolizing optimization, then stores representative past directions in a compact codebook memory built on random projection, where pairwise distances are provably preserved in low-dimensional space. At each step, conflicts between the current update and stored directions are resolved via lightweight orthogonal correction and lifted back through a proximal step, with minimal overhead and no data storage. Across class-imbalanced classification, continual visual learning under domain and class shifts, continual fine-tuning of LLaVA-7B, and GPT-2 pretraining, FOGO consistently improves convergence and knowledge retention, outperforming Adam and Muon.
Related papers
- Drift and Dependence: Layer-wise Information-Theoretic Bounds for Replay-Based Continual Learning [41.371439825328544]
Continual learning must absorb new tasks without erasing old ones, and replay---mixing a small buffer of past examples into current training---is among the most effective remedies for catastrophic forgetting.<n>We develop a layer-wise information-theoretic framework that separates these effects at every depth.<n>Controlled and benchmark experiments confirm the predicted memory scaling, the interior funnel, and the alignment signal's link to forgetting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T06:01:49Z) - Two-Way Is Better Than One: Bidirectional Alignment with Cycle Consistency for Exemplar-Free Class-Incremental Learning [6.63181149575886]
We introduce BiCyc, a projector bidirectional alignment approach with a cycle-consistency objective.<n>We show that BiCyc substantially reduces forgetting and improves accuracy in from-scratch settings, while remaining competitive in the pretrained fine-grained regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T03:57:33Z) - Spectral Imbalance Causes Forgetting in Low-Rank Continual Adaptation [58.3773038915023]
Continual learning aims to adapt pre-trained models to sequential tasks without forgetting previously acquired knowledge.<n>Most existing approaches treat continual learning as avoiding interference with past updates, rather than considering what properties make the current task-specific update naturally preserve previously acquired knowledge.<n>We address this problem using a projected first-order method compatible with standard deep-dots used in vision-language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-31T13:27:02Z) - Geometric-Disentangelment Unlearning [106.99160454669902]
gradient ascent on forget samples often harms retained knowledge.<n>We propose the Geometric-disment Unlearning (GU) that decomposes any candidate forget gradient update into tangential and normal components to retain space and executes only the normal component.<n>Our method is plug-and-play and can be attached to existing gradient-based unlearning procedures to mitigate side effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T09:58:25Z) - Constrained Entropic Unlearning: A Primal-Dual Framework for Large Language Models [14.321060805197874]
Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in real-world settings increasingly face the need to unlearn sensitive, outdated, or proprietary information.<n>Existing unlearning methods formulate forgetting and retention as a regularized trade-off, combining both objectives into a single scalarized loss.<n>We propose a new formulation of LLM unlearning as a constrained optimization problem: forgetting is enforced via a novel logit-margin flattening loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T17:55:23Z) - Train with Perturbation, Infer after Merging: A Two-Stage Framework for Continual Learning [57.514786046966265]
We propose textbfPerturb-and-Merge (P&M), a novel continual learning framework that integrates model merging into the CL paradigm to mitigate forgetting.<n>Our proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on several continual learning benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T14:14:19Z) - SHERL: Synthesizing High Accuracy and Efficient Memory for Resource-Limited Transfer Learning [63.93193829913252]
We propose an innovative METL strategy called SHERL for resource-limited scenarios.
In the early route, intermediate outputs are consolidated via an anti-redundancy operation.
In the late route, utilizing minimal late pre-trained layers could alleviate the peak demand on memory overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T10:22:35Z) - Meta-Learning Adversarial Bandit Algorithms [55.72892209124227]
We study online meta-learning with bandit feedback.
We learn to tune online mirror descent generalization (OMD) with self-concordant barrier regularizers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T13:52:10Z) - Direction Matters: On the Implicit Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent
with Moderate Learning Rate [105.62979485062756]
This paper attempts to characterize the particular regularization effect of SGD in the moderate learning rate regime.
We show that SGD converges along the large eigenvalue directions of the data matrix, while GD goes after the small eigenvalue directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T21:07:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.