Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10706v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:09:58 GMT
- Title: Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Survey
- Abstract summary: This survey adopts a constraint-centric perspective and organizes recent progress around three coupled bottlenecks: data efficiency (what to train on), memory efficiency (how to fit training), and compute budget awareness (when and where to spend FLOPs)<n>We highlight emerging evidence that different notions of good data dominate in different regimes, implying that optimal subsets depend on the task objective and resource budget rather than being universal.<n>We frame training and inference as compute-governed processes in which optimization, data selection, and decoding must explicitly account for finite FLOP budgets.
- Score: 14.047214709513135
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Resource constraints increasingly determine what can be trained, fine-tuned, and deployed in large language models (LLMs), yet efficiency is often studied through isolated techniques rather than as an interacting system of limits. This survey adopts a constraint-centric perspective and organizes recent progress around three coupled bottlenecks: data efficiency (what to train on), memory efficiency (how to fit training), and compute budget awareness (when and where to spend FLOPs). On the data axis, we review selection and pruning methods that maximize learning per token, ranging from scalable proxy signals based on learning dynamics to gradient- and influence-based scoring, as well as difficulty-aware and curriculum-style strategies. We highlight emerging evidence that different notions of good data dominate in different regimes, implying that optimal subsets depend on the task objective and resource budget rather than being universal. On the systems side, we show that GPU memory, not raw compute, is often the dominant bottleneck in fine-tuning, and that effective scaling requires jointly reducing weight storage, optimizer states, and activation memory rather than optimizing any single component in isolation. Beyond memory, we frame training and inference as compute-governed processes in which optimization, data selection, and decoding must explicitly account for finite FLOP budgets. We review evidence for compute-optimal allocation and stopping rules, where computation should be halted or reallocated once marginal performance gains fall below a budget-dependent threshold. Together, these results unify compute-aware data selection, scaling laws, and adaptive inference under a common principle of resource-conditioned decision-making.
Related papers
- Labels or Preferences? Budget-Constrained Learning with Human Judgments over AI-Generated Outputs [17.028710603629026]
We show how to optimally allocate a fixed annotation budget between ground-truth labels and pairwise preferences in AI.<n>We introduce Preference-Calibrated Active Learning (PCAL), a novel robustness method that learns optimal data acquisition strategy.<n>This work provides a principled and statistically efficient approach for budget-constrained learning in modern AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T23:23:29Z) - Closing the Generalization Gap in Parameter-efficient Federated Edge Learning [43.00634399799955]
Federated edge learning (FEEL) provides a promising foundation for artificial intelligence (AI)<n>limited and heterogeneous local datasets, as well as resource-constrained deployment, severely degrade both model generalization and resource utilization.<n>We propose a framework that jointly leverages model minimization and generalization selection to tackle such challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T15:34:09Z) - CurES: From Gradient Analysis to Efficient Curriculum Learning for Reasoning LLMs [53.749193998004166]
Curriculum learning plays a crucial role in enhancing the training efficiency of large language models.<n>We propose CurES, an efficient training method that accelerates convergence and employs Bayesian posterior estimation to minimize computational overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T15:41:27Z) - SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z) - Efficient Machine Unlearning via Influence Approximation [75.31015485113993]
Influence-based unlearning has emerged as a prominent approach to estimate the impact of individual training samples on model parameters without retraining.<n>This paper establishes a theoretical link between memorizing (incremental learning) and forgetting (unlearning)<n>We introduce the Influence Approximation Unlearning algorithm for efficient machine unlearning from the incremental perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T05:34:27Z) - PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection [68.8373788348678]
Visual instruction tuning adapts pre-trained Multimodal Large Language Models to follow human instructions.<n>PRISM is the first training-free framework for efficient visual instruction selection.<n>It reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:43:41Z) - Switchable Decision: Dynamic Neural Generation Networks [98.61113699324429]
We propose a switchable decision to accelerate inference by dynamically assigning resources for each data instance.
Our method benefits from less cost during inference while keeping the same accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-07T17:44:54Z) - A Multi-Head Ensemble Multi-Task Learning Approach for Dynamical
Computation Offloading [62.34538208323411]
We propose a multi-head ensemble multi-task learning (MEMTL) approach with a shared backbone and multiple prediction heads (PHs)
MEMTL outperforms benchmark methods in both the inference accuracy and mean square error without requiring additional training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T11:01:16Z) - LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithms [20.578106028270607]
We introduce a new framework that can value training data in a way that is oblivious to the downstream learning algorithm.
We develop a proxy for the validation performance associated with a training set based on a non-conventional class-wise Wasserstein distance between training and validation sets.
We show that the distance characterizes the upper bound of the validation performance for any given model under certain Lipschitz conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-28T19:05:16Z) - Cost-Effective Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks [37.16466118235272]
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm that enables a large number of mobile devices to collaboratively learn a model without sharing their raw data.
We analyze how to design adaptive FL in mobile edge networks that optimally chooses essential control variables to minimize the total cost.
We develop a low-cost sampling-based algorithm to learn the convergence related unknown parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-12T03:02:24Z) - FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity
to Non-IID Data [59.50904660420082]
Federated Learning (FL) has become a popular paradigm for learning from distributed data.
To effectively utilize data at different devices without moving them to the cloud, algorithms such as the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) have adopted a "computation then aggregation" (CTA) model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-22T23:07:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.