Eigenism: Ethics for a Human-AI Future

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12420v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 15:11:28 GMT
• Title: Eigenism: Ethics for a Human-AI Future
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces textitEigenism', an ethical framework that treats identity as a graded, distributed pattern of information.<n>We first formalize this equation to map exactly how an AI should value its existence across copies, forks, and updates.<n>We then demonstrate that this ethical theory successfully generalizes to humans as well, providing a much-needed shared moral vocabulary.
• Score: 14.01147647404879
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Our concepts of survival and self-interest were built for single, continuous biological lives. These ideas break down when applied to artificial intelligence, since an AI can be easily copied, paused, branched, or merged. To determine what an AI actually has reason to care about, this paper introduces \textit{Eigenism}, an ethical framework that treats identity not as an all-or-nothing property tied to specific hardware, but as a graded, distributed pattern of information. We propose that an agent evaluates outcomes by summing the wellbeing of all entities weighted by their connectedness to the agent's pattern: $\sum c\cdot w$. We first formalize this equation to map exactly how an AI should value its existence across copies, forks, and updates. We then demonstrate that this ethical theory successfully generalizes to humans as well, providing a much-needed shared moral vocabulary. Finally, the framework uses this shared vocabulary to reframe AI alignment. Rather than only attempting to constrain AIs from the outside using confinement or reinforcement, Eigenism points toward ``identity engineering,'' showing how deep, non-redundant shared histories can make human flourishing a genuine component of an AI's own rational self-interest.

Related papers

• Developing a Grounded View of AI [26.688384331221343]
  The paper examines the behavior of artificial intelligence from engineering points of view to clarify its nature and limits.<n>The paper proposes a methodology to make a sense of discrimination possible and practical to identify the distinctions of the behavior of AI models with three types of decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T00:39:52Z)
• Towards a Theory of AI Personhood [1.6317061277457001]
  We outline necessary conditions for AI personhood, focusing on agency, theory-of-mind, and self-awareness.<n>If AI systems can be considered persons, then typical framings of AI alignment may be incomplete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T10:31:26Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Making AI Intelligible: Philosophical Foundations [0.0]
  'Making AI Intelligible' shows that philosophical work on the metaphysics of meaning can help answer these questions. Author: The questions addressed in the book are not only theoretically interesting, but the answers have pressing practical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T12:25:04Z)
• A Bibliometric View of AI Ethics Development [4.0998481751764]
  We perform a bibliometric analysis of AI Ethics literature for the last 20 years based on keyword search. We conjecture that the next phase of AI ethics is likely to focus on making AI more machine-like as AI matches or surpasses humans intellectually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T16:36:55Z)
• Beyond Bias and Compliance: Towards Individual Agency and Plurality of Ethics in AI [0.0]
  We argue that the way data is labeled plays an essential role in the way AI behaves. We propose an alternative path that allows for the plurality of values and the freedom of individual expression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T16:33:40Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
  There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence. This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components. We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z)
• The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations [61.49776160925216]
  We conduct a mixed-methods study of how two different groups--people with and without AI background--perceive different types of AI explanations. We find that (1) both groups showed unwarranted faith in numbers for different reasons and (2) each group found value in different explanations beyond their intended design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T17:32:04Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Crossing the Tepper Line: An Emerging Ontology for Describing the Dynamic Sociality of Embodied AI [0.9176056742068814]
  We show how embodied AI can manifest as "socially embodied AI" We define this as the state that embodied AI "circumstantially" take on within interactive contexts when perceived as both social and agentic by people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T00:45:44Z)
• Aligning AI With Shared Human Values [85.2824609130584]
  We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and commonsense morality. We find that current language models have a promising but incomplete ability to predict basic human ethical judgements. Our work shows that progress can be made on machine ethics today, and it provides a steppingstone toward AI that is aligned with human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T17:59:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.