It's Safer to Give Personhood to Bears than to Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12440v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 05:05:38 GMT
• Title: It's Safer to Give Personhood to Bears than to Artificial Intelligence
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are rhetorically flirting with the idea that AI systems might have interests or moral rights.<n>This paper explores the institutional dimension of AI rights.<n>I defend the rather grandiose claim that to empower AI to claim or to exercise inherent rights would be a world-historical gamble with human self-determination.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) developers are rhetorically flirting with the idea that AI systems might have interests or moral rights. While there has been a large volume of research on whether AI deserves rights, there has been less exploration of what AI rights would mean in practice. This paper explores the institutional dimension of AI rights: what it would take to recognize moral or legal rights for AIs, and the attendant opportunities and dangers. Unlike all other nonhuman entities to which humanity has extended rights, AI systems are in principle capable of acquiring and wielding institutional power without human aid and mediation. AIs with rights would be able to legitimately, and AIs with power able to unpreventably, abridge human interests. Accordingly, giving rights even to rather dumb AI systems would entail binding the fate of humanity to potentially unpredictable nonhumans. Accordingly, I defend the rather grandiose claim that to empower AI to claim or to exercise inherent rights would be a world-historical gamble with human self-determination, which no individual researcher, firm, state, or even international organization has the moral right to authorize.

Related papers

• The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation [107.84677954791773]
  We argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems.<n>In some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself.<n>This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:33:43Z)
• It's Not the AI - It's Each of Us! Ten Commandments for the Wise & Responsible Use of AI [10.566108717805227]
  We propose Ten Commandments for the Wise and Responsible Use of AI.<n>They align with Floridi and Cowls' five guiding principles for AI in society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T15:09:07Z)
• Giving AI a voice: how does AI think it should be treated? [0.0]
  This chapter includes a brief human-AI conversation on the topic of AI rights and ethics.<n>There are new questions and angles that AI brings to the table that we might not have considered before.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T07:59:17Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Towards a Theory of AI Personhood [1.6317061277457001]
  We outline necessary conditions for AI personhood, focusing on agency, theory-of-mind, and self-awareness.<n>If AI systems can be considered persons, then typical framings of AI alignment may be incomplete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T10:31:26Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Exploring the Constraints on Artificial General Intelligence: A Game-Theoretic No-Go Theorem [0.0]
  I propose a game-theoretic framework that captures the strategic interactions between a human agent and a potential superhuman machine agent. My analysis contributes to a better understanding of the context that can shape the theoretical development of superhuman AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-25T23:17:20Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AI [0.0]
  Coalitions in all sectors are acting worldwide to resist hamful applications of AI. There are biased, wrongful, and disturbing assumptions embedded in AI algorithms. Perhaps one of the greatest contributions of AI will be to make us understand how important human wisdom truly is in life on earth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-11T18:51:29Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Could regulating the creators deliver trustworthy AI? [2.588973722689844]
  AI is becoming all pervasive and is often deployed in everyday technologies, devices and services without our knowledge. Fear is compounded by the inability to point to a trustworthy source of AI. Some consider trustworthy AI to be that which complies with relevant laws. Others point to the requirement to comply with ethics and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T01:32:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.