Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12736v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:55:30 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales
• Abstract summary: SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
• Score: 118.2204632627895
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents are increasingly being developed to accelerate scientific discovery, yet their practical capabilities in real research settings remain poorly understood. Existing benchmarks for AI agents rarely capture the complexity, heterogeneity, and extended reasoning required by scientific work, whereas benchmarks for scientific tasks often reduce research to static, direct problems and provide limited support for interactive evaluation. Here, we introduce SciAgentArena, a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios drawn from emerging needs across multiple domains. SciAgentArena comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents. Using this benchmark, we find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis workflows, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear. However, their performance remains uneven across scientific contexts: agents struggle to generate genuinely novel insights, sustain self-directed exploration, and formulate robust solutions for open-ended research questions. We further characterize common failure modes across agents and identify opportunities for improving their reliability, autonomy, and scientific reasoning. Together, SciAgentArena provides a practical framework for measuring progress in AI agents for science and for guiding the design of future agents capable of addressing complex scientific challenges. Full codes, tasks, and datasets can be accessed via this link: https://sciagentarena.github.io/.

Related papers

• SciResearcher: Scaling Deep Research Agents for Frontier Scientific Reasoning [54.194672921128785]
  We introduce SciResearcher, a fully automated agentic framework for frontier-science data construction.<n>SciResearcher synthesizes diverse conceptual and computational tasks grounded in academic evidence.<n>We develop SciResearcher-8B, an agent foundation model that achieves 19.46% on the HLE-Bio/Chem-Gold benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T15:26:45Z)
• Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Retrieval and Synthesis: A Compound AI Architecture for Scientific Discovery [1.5143261755366868]
  BioSage is a novel compound AI architecture that integrates LLMs with RAG, orchestrated specialized agents and tools to enable discoveries across AI, data science, biomedical, and biosecurity domains.<n>Our system features several specialized agents including the retrieval agent with query planning and response synthesis that enable knowledge retrieval across domains with citation-backed responses.<n>Our ongoing work focuses on multimodal retrieval and reasoning over charts, tables, and structured scientific data, along with developing comprehensive multimodal benchmarks for cross-disciplinary discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T05:33:11Z)
• SciAgent: A Unified Multi-Agent System for Generalistic Scientific Reasoning [54.186990494217916]
  SciAgent is a unified multi-agent system designed for generalistic scientific reasoning.<n>A Coordinator Agent interprets each problem's domain and complexity, dynamically orchestrating specialized Worker Systems.<n>These Worker Systems are composed of interacting reasoning Sub-agents for symbolic deduction, conceptual modeling, numerical computation, and verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T12:00:34Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows [82.07367406991678]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing.<n>Among these, computer-using agents are capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do.<n>We introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:27:27Z)
• ML Research Benchmark [0.0]
  We present the ML Research Benchmark (MLRB), comprising 7 competition-level tasks derived from recent machine learning conference tracks. This paper introduces a novel benchmark and evaluates it using agent scaffolds powered by frontier models, including Claude-3 and GPT-4o. The results indicate that the Claude-3.5 Sonnet agent performs best across our benchmark, excelling in planning and developing machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T21:38:42Z)
• DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
  We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery. It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations. We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.