Agent-based models for the evolution of morphological alternation patterns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12748v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:26:44 GMT
• Title: Agent-based models for the evolution of morphological alternation patterns
• Abstract summary: We present a multi-agent simulation of the emergence of morphological stem and inflection alternations.<n>Alternative forms arise by phonological changes or, as with "go/went", from lexical alternatives associated with a subset of the population.<n>We use this to compare a set of real language morphologies, disguised morphologies, and experimentally evolved morphologies.
• Score: 0.5299719769828893
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Why is the past of English "go" the apparently unrelated "went"? Such alternations are frequent in languages. They neither aid communication nor learnability, yet they can be persistent, surviving over centuries or millennia. We present a multi-agent simulation of the emergence of morphological stem and inflection alternations. Alternate forms arise by phonological changes or, as with "go/went", from lexical alternatives associated with a subset of the population. When an agent 'hears' another agent use a novel form for a slot in the paradigm of a word (say, the past tense of go), they will with some probability adopt that form, possibly spreading its use to other slots in the paradigm that shared the same original form. Thus alternative forms can spread through the population and become entrenched as stem or inflectional marker alternants. Unlike many previous computational studies, our system allows for naturalistic lexical forms, realistic phonological rules, lexicons with hundreds or thousands of entries, and agent populations in the tens or hundreds. It supports several network topologies, diffusion patterns and agent adoption policies. One issue with such simulations is evaluation: how realistic is the resulting morphology compared to those of real languages? We introduce the AI Historical Linguist, a novel Large Language Model-driven system that models a debate between two historical linguists. We use this to compare a set of real language morphologies, disguised morphologies, and experimentally evolved morphologies. The results suggest that among the factors that favor more plausible morphologies are scale-free social networks and random Bernoulli adoption of forms. We also present three case studies modeling attested historical changes, allowing us to test what might have happened if history had been different. All code and data are released.

Related papers

• ChatGPT-generated texts show authorship traits that identify them as non-human [0.6741942263052466]
  This work examines whether a language model can also be linked to a specific fingerprint.<n>We find that the model can successfully adapt its style depending on whether it is prompted to produce a Wikipedia entry vs. a college essay.<n>Our results suggest that the model prefers nouns to verbs, thus showing a distinct linguistic backbone from humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T13:38:58Z)
• Do language models accommodate their users? A study of linguistic convergence [15.958711524171362]
  We find that models strongly converge to the conversation's style, often significantly overfitting relative to the human baseline.<n>We observe consistent shifts in convergence across modeling settings, with instruction-tuned and larger models converging less than their pretrained counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T09:55:40Z)
• Model Misalignment and Language Change: Traces of AI-Associated Language in Unscripted Spoken English [0.0]
  In recent years, written language, particularly in science and education, has undergone remarkable shifts in word usage.<n> Divergences between model output and target audience norms can be viewed as a form of misalignment.<n>We constructed a dataset of 22.1 million words from unscripted spoken language drawn from conversational science and technology podcasts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T00:47:33Z)
• State space models can express n-gram languages [51.823427608117626]
  We build state space language models that can solve the next-word prediction task for languages generated from n-gram rules.<n>Our proof shows how SSMs can encode n-gram rules using new theoretical results on their capacity.<n>We conduct experiments with a small dataset generated from n-gram rules to show how our framework can be applied to SSMs and RNNs obtained through gradient-based optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T10:41:23Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Is neural language acquisition similar to natural? A chronological probing study [0.0515648410037406]
  We present the chronological probing study of transformer English models such as MultiBERT and T5. We compare the information about the language learned by the models in the process of training on corpora. The results show that 1) linguistic information is acquired in the early stages of training 2) both language models demonstrate capabilities to capture various features from various levels of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T17:24:11Z)
• Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models [84.86942006830772]
  We conjecture that multilingual pre-trained models can derive language-universal abstractions about grammar. We conduct the first large-scale empirical study over 43 languages and 14 morphosyntactic categories with a state-of-the-art neuron-level probe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T12:22:31Z)
• Dependency-based Mixture Language Models [53.152011258252315]
  We introduce the Dependency-based Mixture Language Models. In detail, we first train neural language models with a novel dependency modeling objective. We then formulate the next-token probability by mixing the previous dependency modeling probability distributions with self-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T06:28:30Z)
• Lexical semantic change for Ancient Greek and Latin [61.69697586178796]
  Associating a word's correct meaning in its historical context is a central challenge in diachronic research. We build on a recent computational approach to semantic change based on a dynamic Bayesian mixture model. We provide a systematic comparison of dynamic Bayesian mixture models for semantic change with state-of-the-art embedding-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-22T12:04:08Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)
• Neural Polysynthetic Language Modelling [15.257624461339867]
  In high-resource languages, a common approach is to treat morphologically-distinct variants of a common root as completely independent word types. This assumes, that there are limited inflections per root, and that the majority will appear in a large enough corpus. We examine the current state-of-the-art in language modelling, machine translation, and text prediction for four polysynthetic languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T22:57:04Z)
• A Simple Joint Model for Improved Contextual Neural Lemmatization [60.802451210656805]
  We present a simple joint neural model for lemmatization and morphological tagging that achieves state-of-the-art results on 20 languages. Our paper describes the model in addition to training and decoding procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-04-04T02:03:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.