Learning What to Remember: A Cognitively Grounded Multi-Factor Value Model for Agentic Memory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12945v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:17:31 GMT
• Title: Learning What to Remember: A Cognitively Grounded Multi-Factor Value Model for Agentic Memory
• Abstract summary: Long-running LLM agents accumulate interaction histories far larger than any context window.<n>Production systems answer with semantic similarity or recency.<n>We propose a multi-factor memory function V(m)=sum_i w_i f_i(m) over seven interpretable factors.
• Score: 1.2127875744950842
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Long-running LLM agents accumulate interaction histories far larger than any context window, forcing a standing decision: what to encode deeply, what to forget, and what to retrieve under a fixed memory budget. Production systems answer with semantic similarity or recency -- both mis-specified for the forgetting decision, which is made at consolidation time before the future query is known. We propose a multi-factor memory value function V(m)=\sum_i w_i f_i(m) over seven interpretable factors (emotional intensity, goal relevance, value alignment, self/user relevance, task utility, reliability, and usage history) drawn from cognitive psychology, whose weights are learned from a downstream objective by a gradient-free optimiser, and whose single scalar uniformly controls encoding depth, forget risk, and retrieval rank. We make a methodological point: on LongMemEval, scoring goal relevance against the held-out evaluation question saturates gold-evidence retention at \approx 0.98 -- this measures retrieval, not forgetting. In the realistic blind regime, a learned multi-factor value retains 0.770 \pm 0.011 of gold evidence across 479 usable cases, versus 0.657 for uniform weights, 0.518 for the best single factor, and 0.368 for recency; every paired gap's 95% bootstrap CI is above zero, and a neural network over the same factors ties the linear model. The learned weights are interpretable -- reliability, emotional intensity, and self/user relevance dominate, while query-time goal similarity is correctly down-weighted for the forgetting decision. A controlled synthetic task with planted confounds confirms the learner recovers a separating weighting (1.00 retention) where uniform weighting fails (0.62). The substrate is open-source; all experiments run on a single CPU with no API calls.

Related papers

• Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
  Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z)
• Memory Depth, Not Memory Access: Selective Parametric Consolidation for Long-Running Language Agents [0.0]
  We study memory depth: durable goal-conditioned tendencies written into a small parametric store.<n>We introduce the loop-drift protocol, a controlled stress test in which the retrieval index remains intact while working context is unloaded.<n>We find that selective consolidation factorizes into two controllable dimensions: selection and actuation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T09:42:56Z)
• Temporal Validity in Retrieval Memory: Eliminating Stale-Fact Errors for AI Agents over Evolving Knowledge [0.0]
  Retrieval-augmented generation gives agents access to accumulated knowledge, but has no model of time.<n>We present MemStrata, a retrieval memory maintaining temporal validity.<n>Across six benchmarks run locally with a 7B model, MemStrata ties RAG on static knowledge and reaches 0.95-1.00 accuracy on evolving knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T01:31:53Z)
• LLMs Show No Signs Of Individuated Metacognition [0.023227405857540805]
  We decompose binary confidence judgements from 20 Large Language Models.<n>We ask whether two models that differ in confidence also differ in performance.<n>We find no evidence for significant verbalised individuated metacognition in any tested domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T23:54:33Z)
• MemReranker: Reasoning-Aware Reranking for Agent Memory Retrieval [37.54115468116941]
  This report introduces MemReranker, a reranking model family (0.6B/4B) built on Qwen3-Reranker through multi-stage LLM knowledge distillation.<n>On the memory retrieval benchmark, MemReranker-0.6B substantially outperforms BGE-Reranker and matches open-source 4B/8B models as well as GPT-4o-mini on key metrics.<n>MemReranker-4B further achieves 0.737 MAP, with several metrics on par with Gemini-3-Flash, while maintaining inference latency at only 10-20% of large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T12:33:57Z)
• When to Forget: A Memory Governance Primitive [0.0]
  Memory Worth is a two-counter per-memory signal that tracks how often a memory co-occurs with successful versus failed outcomes.<n>We prove that MW converges almost surely to the conditional success probability p+(m) = Pr[y_t = +1 | m in M_t] under a stationary retrieval regime.<n>We argue this is still a useful operational signal for memory governance, and we validate it empirically in a controlled synthetic environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T19:54:14Z)
• ImplicitMemBench: Measuring Unconscious Behavioral Adaptation in Large Language Models [60.14219417402433]
  Existing memory benchmarks for LLM agents evaluate explicit recall of facts, yet overlook implicit memory where experience becomes automated behavior without conscious retrieval.<n>We introduce ImplicitMemBench, the first systematic benchmark evaluating implicit memory through three constructs drawn from standard cognitive-science accounts of non-declarative memory.<n>Our 300-item suite employs a unified Learning/Priming-Interfere-Test protocol with first-attempt scoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T10:26:32Z)
• Learn by Surprise, Commit by Proof [0.0]
  We propose a self-gated post-training framework for autonomous knowledge acquisition.<n>When a passage produces anomalously high pertoken loss, L SCP flags it, generates a Q&A chain that forces the model to articulate its own knowledge.<n>The entire learning intensity is governed by a single parameter $r$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T12:17:10Z)
• Label-Free Cross-Task LoRA Merging with Null-Space Compression [50.63908869296697]
  We introduce Null-Space Compression (NSC) Merging, a label-free, output-agnostic method that sets merge weights from adapter geometry.<n>NSC achieves state-of-the-art performance across twenty heterogeneous vision tasks with balanced gains where prior methods overfit subsets of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T11:34:41Z)
• CORE: Context-Robust Remasking for Diffusion Language Models [51.59514489363897]
  We propose Context-Robust Remasking (CORE), a training-free framework for inference-time revision.<n>Rather than trusting static token probabilities, CORE identifies context-brittle tokens by probing their sensitivity to targeted masked-context perturbations.<n>On LLaDA-8B-Base, CORE delivers consistent improvements across reasoning and code benchmarks, outperforming compute-matched baselines and improving MBPP by up to 9.2 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T00:12:30Z)
• Primal Dual Continual Learning: Balancing Stability and Plasticity through Adaptive Memory Allocation [86.8475564814154]
  We show that it is both possible and beneficial to undertake the constrained optimization problem directly. We focus on memory-based methods, where a small subset of samples from previous tasks can be stored in a replay buffer. We show that dual variables indicate the sensitivity of the optimal value of the continual learning problem with respect to constraint perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T21:23:27Z)
• Value-Distributional Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [59.758009422067]
  Quantifying uncertainty about a policy's long-term performance is important to solve sequential decision-making tasks. We study the problem from a model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning perspective. We propose Epistemic Quantile-Regression (EQR), a model-based algorithm that learns a value distribution function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-12T14:59:19Z)
• Offline Contextual Bandits with Overparameterized Models [52.788628474552276]
  We ask whether the same phenomenon occurs for offline contextual bandits. We show that this discrepancy is due to the emphaction-stability of their objectives. In experiments with large neural networks, this gap between action-stable value-based objectives and unstable policy-based objectives leads to significant performance differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T13:52:07Z)
• Neural Methods for Point-wise Dependency Estimation [129.93860669802046]
  We focus on estimating point-wise dependency (PD), which quantitatively measures how likely two outcomes co-occur. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches in 1) MI estimation, 2) self-supervised representation learning, and 3) cross-modal retrieval task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T23:26:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.