Approximability limits for bounded-degree max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13570v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:59:12 GMT
• Title: Approximability limits for bounded-degree max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry
• Abstract summary: For general max-k-XORSAT with $k geq 3$, no-time algorithm can do substantially better than random guessing on worst-case instances.<n>We make this connection explicit and extend the hardness to max-E$k$-LINSAT$(q,r)$ with bounded degree $D$ and over arbitrary finite fields.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: For general max-k-XORSAT with $k \geq 3$, no polynomial-time algorithm can do substantially better than random guessing on worst-case instances unless $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$: approximating beyond the random-assignment value of $1/2$ is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. The picture changes when each variable appears in at most $D$ constraints. In that bounded-degree setting, polynomial-time algorithms can provably beat the random baseline by an additive amount of order $1/\sqrt{D}$. For Boolean instances, this scaling is known to be optimal: the matching hardness result is due to Trevisan, while the corresponding algorithmic guarantee was established by Barak et al. Whether the same holds over general finite fields, and what it implies for quantum algorithms, has not been established. We make this connection explicit and extend the hardness to max-E$k$-LINSAT$(q,r)$ with bounded degree $D$ and over arbitrary finite fields $\mathbb{F}_q$, proving that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to exceed $r/q + \mathcal{O}_{q,r}(1/\sqrt{D})$. These results provide the complexity-theoretic benchmark for the bounded-degree instances targeted by decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), QAOA, and classical heuristics. Any quantum advantage on bounded-degree instances is therefore confined to the constant prefactor. We further show that in the context of DQI and on $(k,D)$-regular instances, this prefactor is sensitive to the nature of the decoder: DQI with classical decoders faces an information-theoretic $1/\sqrt{D \log D}$ barrier that prevents it from matching the hardness scaling, while DQI with quantum decoders is compatible with the $1/\sqrt{D}$ scaling -- identifying quantum decoding as the key ingredient for matching the complexity-theoretic scaling with DQI.

Related papers

• Faster quantum linear system solver beyond the condition number [50.84794327094274]
  We present two quantum algorithms that produce the normalized solution $|xrangle$ of linear system $Ax=| b rangle$ to accuracy $$ with complexity independent of the condition number $=lVert A-1rVert$.<n>Our filtering-based solver is extremely simple with a favorable runtime prefactor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T17:49:40Z)
• Hardness of High-Dimensional Linear Classification [58.29089693778071]
  We establish new exponential in dimension lower bounds for the Maximum Halfspace Discrepancy problem.<n>Both are fundamental problems in computational geometry and machine learning in their exact and approximate forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T15:53:41Z)
• Tight inapproximability of max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry [0.0]
  We prove by a direct reduction from Hstad's theorem that no-time algorithm can exceed the randomassignment ratio $r/q$ by any constant.<n>This threshold coincides with the $ell/m to 0$ limit of the semicircle law governing decoded quantum interferometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T19:26:26Z)
• A Quantum Algorithm For Computing Contextuality Bounds [0.0]
  We give a quantum algorithm based on Grover's search algorithm, computing the degree of contextuality in $O(sqrtn loglogn)$ in $n$ states, a speedup over classical brute force method.<n>We also study variations of Grover which encode the relevant information in the phases of the basis states, reducing circuit width and depth requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T15:36:02Z)
• Measuring quantum relative entropy with finite-size effect [53.64687146666141]
  We study the estimation of relative entropy $D(rho|sigma)$ when $sigma$ is known.<n>Our estimator attains the Cram'er-Rao type bound when the dimension $d$ is fixed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T06:07:20Z)
• Efficient Quantum State Synthesis with One Query [0.0]
  We present a time analogue quantum algorithm making a single query (in superposition) to a classical oracle. We prove that every $n$-qubit state can be constructed to within 0.01 error by an $On/n)$-size circuit over an appropriate finite gate set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T17:49:35Z)
• Exponential Separation between Quantum and Classical Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, Reordering Method and Hierarchies [68.93512627479197]
  We study quantum Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams($OBDD$) model. We prove lower bounds and upper bounds for OBDD with arbitrary order of input variables. We extend hierarchy for read$k$-times Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams ($k$-OBDD$) of width.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T12:37:56Z)
• A lower bound on the space overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computation [51.723084600243716]
  The threshold theorem is a fundamental result in the theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation. We prove an exponential upper bound on the maximal length of fault-tolerant quantum computation with amplitude noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T22:19:49Z)
• Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Linear Payoff Functions [53.77572276969548]
  We show that the C$2$UCB algorithm has the optimal regret bound $tildeO(dsqrtkT + dk)$ for the partition matroid constraints. For general constraints, we propose an algorithm that modifies the reward estimates of arms in the C$2$UCB algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-20T04:29:18Z)
• Quantum learning algorithms imply circuit lower bounds [7.970954821067043]
  We establish the first general connection between the design of quantum algorithms and circuit lower bounds. Our proof builds on several works in learning theory, pseudorandomness, and computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T14:03:20Z)
• An Optimal Separation of Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity [67.19751155411075]
  We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order $ellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ sum to at most $cellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ where $n$ is the number of variables, $d$ is the tree depth, and $c>0$ is an absolute constant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T06:50:57Z)
• Quasi-polynomial time algorithms for free quantum games in bounded dimension [11.56707165033]
  We give a semidefinite program of size $exp(mathcalObig(T12(log2(AT)+log(Q)log(AT))/epsilon2big)) to compute additive $epsilon$-approximations on the values of two-player free games. We make a connection to the quantum separability problem and employ improved multipartite quantum de Finetti theorems with linear constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T16:55:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.