Design Methodology and Performance Trade-offs Management for Distributed and Compound AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14350v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 11:09:57 GMT
• Title: Design Methodology and Performance Trade-offs Management for Distributed and Compound AI Systems
• Abstract summary: Compound AI systems realize this shift by orchestrating multiple models, algorithms, and tools as distributed AI systems through explicit control logic.<n>We present a design methodology that organizes this space along two dimensions, workflow topology and configuration selection, and identifies eight design patterns.
• Score: 1.1470070927586018
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems must typically satisfy service-level objectives including accuracy, latency, and cost. The prevailing model-centric approaches select a monolithic model at design time and apply identical computation regardless of input difficulty, cannot decompose tasks across specialized components, and have knowledge that is fixed at training time. During runtime, this can lead to performance degradation and increasing costs. Because the model is the main design variable, it determines the majority of system behavior, coupling operational objectives to a single design-time choice. Addressing these limitations requires shifting from model-centric to system-centric design. Compound AI systems realize this shift by orchestrating multiple models, algorithms, and tools as distributed AI systems through explicit control logic. The performance of such systems depends on their workflow topology, the models assigned to each task, and the parameters governing runtime behavior. We present a design methodology that organizes this space along two dimensions, workflow topology and configuration selection, and identifies eight design patterns, each consolidating techniques to address a specific limitation of monolithic deployment. We validate our methodology through three case studies. Across our case studies, Compound AI configurations approach accuracy of monolithic models within 2.5 to 4 percentage points while reducing latency by up to 60% and cost by up to 71%. We show that model selection and parameter configuration jointly determine system performance, but the resulting design space grows combinatorially, as workflows compose more patterns and components. Thus, we identify five open challenges that define a roadmap from manually configured prototypes towards systems that automatically discover and maintain SLO-compliance in Compound and Distributed AI systems.

Related papers

• Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models [62.62160094849002]
  RADIANT is an engineering methodology that combines MDE with Multi-Agent Large Language Models.<n>It automatically generates heterogeneous models across engineering phases.<n>It provides exact, automated change-impact analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T08:50:55Z)
• PLAIground: SLO-Driven Runtime Model Selection for Compound AI Systems in the Edge-Cloud-Space Continuum [1.0499611180329804]
  Compound AI systems must satisfy stringent Service Level Objectives (SLOs) on accuracy, latency, and cost.<n>Existing distributed and compound AI frameworks do not support runtime model selection.<n>We present PLAIground, a framework that enables runtime model selection for Compound AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T11:34:51Z)
• Design-OS: A Specification-Driven Framework for Engineering System Design with a Control-Systems Design Case [0.0]
  Design-OS is a specification-driven workflow for engineering system design organized in five stages.<n>Each stage produces structured artifacts that maintain traceability and support agent-augmented execution.<n>A blank template and the full design-case artifacts are shared in a public repository to support and reuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T17:26:44Z)
• Dynamic Model Routing and Cascading for Efficient LLM Inference: A Survey [4.273936276295959]
  Large language models (LLMs) with diverse capabilities, costs, and domains have created a critical need for intelligent model selection at inference time.<n> Dynamic routing systems that adaptively select models based on query characteristics have emerged as a solution to this challenge.<n>We provide a systematic analysis of state-of-the-art multi-LLM routing and cascading approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T21:57:27Z)
• Performance and Complexity Trade-off Optimization of Speech Models During Training [5.335528687192602]
  In speech machine learning, neural network models are typically designed by choosing an architecture with fixed layer sizes and structure.<n>While the overall architecture is usually guided by prior knowledge of the task, the sizes of individual layers are often chosen.<n>Unlike pruning methods, our approach allows the model size to be dynamically optimized for a target performance-complexity trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T08:00:05Z)
• AnaFlow: Agentic LLM-based Workflow for Reasoning-Driven Explainable and Sample-Efficient Analog Circuit Sizing [1.2617078020344616]
  A novel agentic AI framework for sample-efficient and explainable analog circuit sizing is presented.<n>The AnaFlow framework is demonstrated for two circuits of varying complexity and is able to complete the sizing task fully automatically.<n>The inherent explainability makes this a powerful tool for analog design space exploration and a new paradigm in analog EDA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T18:24:01Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• Compositional Generative Inverse Design [69.22782875567547]
  Inverse design, where we seek to design input variables in order to optimize an underlying objective function, is an important problem. We show that by instead optimizing over the learned energy function captured by the diffusion model, we can avoid such adversarial examples. In an N-body interaction task and a challenging 2D multi-airfoil design task, we demonstrate that by composing the learned diffusion model at test time, our method allows us to design initial states and boundary shapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:33:39Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Microprocessor Design Space Exploration [71.95914457415624]
  Microprocessor architects are increasingly resorting to domain-specific customization in the quest for high-performance and energy-efficiency. We propose an alternative formulation that leverages Multi-Agent RL (MARL) to tackle this problem. Our evaluation shows that the MARL formulation consistently outperforms single-agent RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T17:10:24Z)
• Task-Oriented Sensing, Computation, and Communication Integration for Multi-Device Edge AI [108.08079323459822]
  This paper studies a new multi-intelligent edge artificial-latency (AI) system, which jointly exploits the AI model split inference and integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) We measure the inference accuracy by adopting an approximate but tractable metric, namely discriminant gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-03T06:57:07Z)
• Controllable Dynamic Multi-Task Architectures [92.74372912009127]
  We propose a controllable multi-task network that dynamically adjusts its architecture and weights to match the desired task preference as well as the resource constraints. We propose a disentangled training of two hypernetworks, by exploiting task affinity and a novel branching regularized loss, to take input preferences and accordingly predict tree-structured models with adapted weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T17:56:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.