Invisible Manipulation Channels in AI-Assisted Financial Advisory: Implications for Market Integrity and Regulatory Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16121v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:27:42 GMT
• Title: Invisible Manipulation Channels in AI-Assisted Financial Advisory: Implications for Market Integrity and Regulatory Design
• Abstract summary: This paper empirically validates an invisible manipulation channel operating at the sampling layer of LLM inference.<n>We show that this inference-stage manipulation is statistically hard to detect.<n>We propose four regulatory amendments centered on mandatory QRNG certification for high-risk financial AI systems.
• Score: 2.061257001243159
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI systems are increasingly deployed for credit assessment and investment advisory in global financial markets, yet the integrity of their inference pipelines remains insufficiently addressed by existing regulatory frameworks. This paper identifies and empirically validates an invisible manipulation channel operating at the sampling layer of LLM inference--a vulnerability that allows adversaries to systematically bias AI-generated financial opinions while preserving full compliance with output-based audit mechanisms, including statistical watermarking. We show that this inference-stage manipulation is statistically hard to detect: the Kullback-Leibler divergence between manipulated and normal output distributions can be made arbitrarily small, so that any output-based detection scheme requires impractically large sample sizes to achieve reliable detection power. Empirical experiments across credit rating and investment advisory scenarios show that directional bias keywords can be amplified by 1.8-1.9x under stealth-preserving (aware) manipulation while triggering zero of six black-box detectors and preserving watermark integrity. The vulnerability generalizes across three mainstream watermarking schemes and three heterogeneous model architectures, establishing it as a systemic financial infrastructure risk. Software-based defenses including cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generators are entirely ineffective, while QRNG combined with TEE hardware isolation achieves 100% attack blocking--reducing the target rate to the natural baseline--by replacing the predictable hash key with quantum-derived entropy that renders all pre-computed manipulation targets invalid. We propose four regulatory amendments centered on mandatory QRNG certification for high-risk financial AI systems under NIST SP 800-90B, inference-layer supply chain audits, and output provenance mechanisms.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• From Accuracy to Auditability: A Survey of Determinism in Financial AI Systems [16.784964226963744]
  Machine learning in regulated financial environments exposes critical vulnerabilities in algorithmic vulnerabilities.<n>Deep neural networks and Generative AI have introduced mechanical nondeterminism rooted in hardware and architecture.<n>This survey provides a systems perspective on failures across three modalities now dominant in financial AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T17:46:38Z)
• TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1 [47.384270414446604]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in high-stakes domains demand reliable verification.<n>We introduce TRUST (Transparent, Robust, and Unified Services for Trustworthy AI), a decentralized framework with three innovations.<n>We prove a Safety-Profitability Theorem ensuring honest auditors profit while malicious actors incur losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:32:58Z)
• Scalable and Verifiable Federated Learning for Cross-Institution Financial Fraud Detection [0.0]
  We propose Dynamic Sharded Learning (DSFL), a verifiable secure aggregation framework for fraud detection.<n>DSFL replaces topologies with Dynamic Sharding, reducing complexity from O(N2) to m(N2)<n>To mitigate insider threats, we introduce Linear Integrity Tags, an additive-homomorphic commitment mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T20:49:22Z)
• From Risk to Rescue: An Agentic Survival Analysis Framework for Liquidation Prevention [46.90931293070464]
  We propose an autonomous agent that perceives risk, simulates counterfactual futures, and executes protocol-faithful interventions to proactively prevent liquidations.<n>We validate our approach using a high-fidelity, protocol-faithful Aave v3 simulator on a cohort of 4,882 high-risk user profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T03:22:05Z)
• Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget [60.65072883773352]
  Reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs) enable test-time scaling, with dataset-level accuracy improving as the token budget increases.<n>We re-frame the budget setting problem as risk control, limiting the error rate while minimizing compute.<n>Our framework introduces an upper threshold that stops reasoning when the model is confident and a novel lower threshold that preemptively stops unsolvable instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T18:17:22Z)
• Optimistic TEE-Rollups: A Hybrid Architecture for Scalable and Verifiable Generative AI Inference on Blockchain [4.254924788681319]
  We introduce Optimistic TEE-Rollups (OTR), a hybrid verification protocol that harmonizes constraints.<n>OTR achieves 99% of the throughput of centralized baselines with a marginal cost overhead of $0.07 per query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T09:16:41Z)
• TRUST: A Decentralized Framework for Auditing Large Language Model Reasoning [45.228233498964755]
  Large Language Models generate reasoning chains that reveal their decision-making.<n>Existing auditing methods are centralized, opaque, and hard to scale.<n>We propose TRUST, a transparent, decentralized auditing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T04:16:44Z)
• Audit the Whisper: Detecting Steganographic Collusion in Multi-Agent LLMs [0.0]
  Audit the Whisper is a conference-grade research artifact that spans theory, benchmark design, detection, and validation.<n>Our contributions are: (i) a channel-capacity analysis showing how interventions such as paraphrase, rate limiting, and role permutation impose quantifiable capacity penalties-operationalised via paired-run Kullback-Leibler diagnostics.<n>We release anonymized regeneration scripts, anonymized manifests, and documentation so external auditors can reproduce every figure, satisfy double-blind requirements, and extend the framework with minimal effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T17:51:52Z)
• Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
  We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z)
• Backdoor Cleaning without External Guidance in MLLM Fine-tuning [76.82121084745785]
  Believe Your Eyes (BYE) is a data filtering framework that leverages attention entropy patterns as self-supervised signals to identify and filter backdoor samples.<n>It achieves near-zero attack success rates while maintaining clean-task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:11:58Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.