Look Again Before You Abstain:Budgeted Conformal Evidence Acquisition for Reliable Vision-Language Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16667v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:02:50 GMT
• Title: Look Again Before You Abstain:Budgeted Conformal Evidence Acquisition for Reliable Vision-Language Model
• Abstract summary: A principled remedy is selective prediction with a distribution-free guarantee-verify each claim and abstain when the claim is not grounded.<n>We show, however, that this guarantee is bought at a brutal price: to keep the hallucination rate below $5%$ on a balanced object-existence benchmark, a state-of-the-art conformal filter must abstain on more than $80%$ of claims.<n>We introduce Budgeted Conformal Evidence Acquisition (BCEA), which replaces the binary answer/abstain decision with a three-way choice: answer, abstain, or acquire additional visual evidence.
• Score: 31.082191748525137
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) hallucinate: they assert visual details that the image does not support. A principled remedy is selective prediction with a distribution-free guarantee-verify each claim and abstain when the claim is not grounded, so that the hallucination rate among asserted claims is provably bounded. We show, however, that this guarantee is bought at a brutal price: to keep the hallucination rate below $5\%$ on a balanced object-existence benchmark, a state-of-the-art conformal filter must abstain on more than $80\%$ of claims. We argue that abstention is wasteful when more visual evidence is cheaply available, and introduce Budgeted Conformal Evidence Acquisition (BCEA), which replaces the binary answer/abstain decision with a three-way choice: answer, abstain, or acquire additional visual evidence by re-examining the image (zooming, cropping, or applying a claim-specific intervention) under a bounded compute budget. We make two observations. First, acquisition that is plugged naively into a calibrated filter breaks the statistical guarantee -- realized risk overshoots the target by up to $17$ points -- because the acquisition step destroys the exchangeability that conformal calibration relies on. Second, folding the entire acquisition policy into the score function and re-calibrating on post-acquisition scores \emph{restores} the finite-sample guarantee while still recovering coverage. BCEA further uses structured, claim-type-specific interventions. Across the POPE benchmark and COCO-constructed existence and spatial-relation claims, on four open VLMs, BCEA controls the hallucination rate at the target level and consistently improves coverage over a guaranteed-abstention baseline.

Related papers

• REIN: Bridging the Gap between Reasoning and Reliability via Reflection and Abstention Alignment [35.47736821237044]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) are prone to hallucination, which undermines their reliability and poses challenges for safe deployment.<n>We propose REIN, an alignment framework that trains LRMs to produce a structured reasoning sequence.<n>REIN introduces a reward mechanism that encourages explicit abstention when none of the sampled reasoning chains yields a correct answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T05:37:13Z)
• ECO/CPO-DAG: A Contradiction-Based Accountability Layer for Adversarial Supply Chains [0.0]
  ECO/CPO-DAG is a domain-specific accountability protocol for adversarial supply chains.<n>It formalizes contradiction detection as a supplemental validation layer.<n>The protocol's boundary is explicit: it detects provable contradictions, not consistent lies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T21:03:26Z)
• BALTO: Balanced Token-Level Policy Optimization for Hallucination Mitigation [51.22170603236523]
  We propose a Balanced Token-level Policy Optimization framework for hallucination mitigation.<n>BalTO extracts checkable factual claims, verifies them against the reference context, and projects claim-level judgments to token-level labels.<n>Experiments on ConFiQA, RAGTruth, and FinLLM-Eval show that BALTO achieves the highest faithfulness across all six model--benchmark settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T16:25:59Z)
• P$^2$-DPO: Grounding Hallucination in Perceptual Processing via Calibration Direct Preference Optimization [55.74731799669337]
  Hallucination has recently garnered significant research attention in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) aims to learn directly from the corrected preferences provided by humans.<n>Existing preference pairs are often vision-agnostic and their inherently off-policy nature limits their effectiveness in guiding model learning.<n>We propose Perceptual Processing Direct Preference Optimization (P$2$-DPO), a novel training paradigm in which the model generates and learns from its own preference pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T09:22:53Z)
• Byzantine-Robust and Differentially Private Federated Optimization under Weaker Assumptions [89.52532304099522]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a shared model without centralizing their raw data, offering an inherent level of privacy.<n> gradients and model updates can still leak sensitive information, while malicious servers may mount adversarial attacks such as Byzantine manipulation.<n>These vulnerabilities highlight the need to address differential privacy (DP) and Byzantine robustness within a unified framework.<n>We propose Byz-Clip21-SGD2M, a new algorithm that integrates robust aggregation with double momentum and carefully designed clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T17:39:09Z)
• Conformal Tradeoffs: Guarantees Beyond Coverage [0.02648566468224904]
  Deployed conformal predictors are long-lived decision infrastructure operating over finite operational windows.<n> Marginal coverage does not determine deployment-facing quantities.<n>We provide a framework for operational certification and planning beyond coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T07:58:25Z)
• LATA: Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation for Conformal Uncertainty in Medical VLMs [61.06744611795341]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are strong zero-shot recognizers for medical imaging.<n>We propose texttttextbfLATA (Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation), a textittraining- and label-free refinement.<n>texttttextbfLATA sharpens zero-shot predictions without compromising exchangeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T16:45:38Z)
• Audit the Whisper: Detecting Steganographic Collusion in Multi-Agent LLMs [0.0]
  Audit the Whisper is a conference-grade research artifact that spans theory, benchmark design, detection, and validation.<n>Our contributions are: (i) a channel-capacity analysis showing how interventions such as paraphrase, rate limiting, and role permutation impose quantifiable capacity penalties-operationalised via paired-run Kullback-Leibler diagnostics.<n>We release anonymized regeneration scripts, anonymized manifests, and documentation so external auditors can reproduce every figure, satisfy double-blind requirements, and extend the framework with minimal effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T17:51:52Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstention [70.83870602967625]
  We develop a principled procedure for determining when a large language model should abstain from responding in a general domain. We leverage conformal prediction techniques to develop an abstention procedure that benefits from rigorous theoretical guarantees on the hallucination rate (error rate) Experimentally, our resulting conformal abstention method reliably bounds the hallucination rate on various closed-book, open-domain generative question answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T11:32:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.