Automated jailbreak attack targeting multiple defense strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16751v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:09:37 GMT
• Title: Automated jailbreak attack targeting multiple defense strategies
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks.<n>However, their safety remains a critical concern due to their susceptibility to adversarial prompt-based attacks.<n>We present UNIATTACK, an adversarial testing framework designed from a defense-oriented perspective.
• Score: 11.710908982928594
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks. However, their safety remains a critical concern due to their susceptibility to adversarial prompt-based attacks. In this paper, we present UNIATTACK, an adversarial testing framework designed from a defense-oriented perspective to systematically construct effective black-box attack prompts. Unlike prior approaches that rely on static templates or iterative model-specific tuning, UNIATTACK extracts minimal but high-impact attack features from diverse existing attacks, optimizes them via a specialized attacker LLM, and composes them into flexible templates through automated refinement process. This feature-centric construction enables one-shot attacks that generalize across multiple models and safety categories, providing a practical tool for assessing LLM robustness. Our evaluation results shows that compared to the baselines, UNIATTACK achieves an average attack success rate (ASR) improvement of 64.63\%-248.82\% on models deployed with multi-layered defense mechanisms and it only takes 0.03\%-4.96\% cost of the baselines. UNIATTACK artifact is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/UniAttack-Artifact-30F1.

Related papers

• Universal Defenses for Tool-Integrated LLM Agents Against Adversarial Attacks [12.83067910280608]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a variety of domains.<n>They are increasingly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including direct prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, memory poisoning, and backdoor attacks.<n>We explore practical and generalizable defense strategies within a unified framework across these four attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T15:20:30Z)
• ICL-EVADER: Zero-Query Black-Box Evasion Attacks on In-Context Learning and Their Defenses [8.57098009274006]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become a powerful, data-efficient paradigm for text classification using large language models.<n>We introduce ICL-Evader, a novel black-box evasion attack framework that operates under a highly practical zero-query threat model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:50:50Z)
• A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models [55.60375624503877]
  Model extraction attacks pose significant security threats to deployed language models.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive taxonomy of extraction attacks and defenses, categorizing attacks into functionality extraction, training data extraction, and prompt-targeted attacks.<n>We examine defense mechanisms organized into model protection, data privacy protection, and prompt-targeted strategies, evaluating their effectiveness across different deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T22:02:01Z)
• MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
  Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z)
• AegisLLM: Scaling Agentic Systems for Self-Reflective Defense in LLM Security [74.22452069013289]
  AegisLLM is a cooperative multi-agent defense against adversarial attacks and information leakage.<n>We show that scaling agentic reasoning system at test-time substantially enhances robustness without compromising model utility.<n> Comprehensive evaluations across key threat scenarios, including unlearning and jailbreaking, demonstrate the effectiveness of AegisLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T17:36:05Z)
• ELBA-Bench: An Efficient Learning Backdoor Attacks Benchmark for Large Language Models [55.93380086403591]
  Generative large language models are vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>$textitELBA-Bench$ allows attackers to inject backdoor through parameter efficient fine-tuning.<n>$textitELBA-Bench$ provides over 1300 experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T12:55:28Z)
• Prefix Guidance: A Steering Wheel for Large Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks [27.11523234556414]
  We propose a plug-and-play and easy-to-deploy jailbreak defense framework, namely Prefix Guidance (PG) PG guides the model to identify harmful prompts by directly setting the first few tokens of the model's output. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PG across three models and five attack methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T14:51:32Z)
• Raccoon: Prompt Extraction Benchmark of LLM-Integrated Applications [8.51254190797079]
  We introduce the Raccoon benchmark which comprehensively evaluates a model's susceptibility to prompt extraction attacks. Our novel evaluation method assesses models under both defenseless and defended scenarios. Our findings highlight universal susceptibility to prompt theft in the absence of defenses, with OpenAI models demonstrating notable resilience when protected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T18:57:22Z)
• Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models [109.75753454188705]
  Recent work shows that text moderations can produce jailbreaking prompts that bypass defenses. We look at three types of defenses: detection (perplexity based), input preprocessing (paraphrase and retokenization), and adversarial training. We find that the weakness of existing discretes for text, combined with the relatively high costs of optimization, makes standard adaptive attacks more challenging for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T17:59:44Z)
• MultiRobustBench: Benchmarking Robustness Against Multiple Attacks [86.70417016955459]
  We present the first unified framework for considering multiple attacks against machine learning (ML) models. Our framework is able to model different levels of learner's knowledge about the test-time adversary. We evaluate the performance of 16 defended models for robustness against a set of 9 different attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T20:26:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.