ERQA-Plus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Reasoning in Embodied AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17639v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:18:46 GMT
• Title: ERQA-Plus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Reasoning in Embodied AI
• Abstract summary: ERQA-Plus is a diagnostic benchmark for reasoning in embodied AI.<n>It contains 1,766 question-answer instances grounded in 711 robot-centric images.
• Score: 14.957780321740394
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generalist embodied agents require more than object recognition: they must reason about spatial relations, actions, procedures, human intentions, environmental constraints, and commonsense consequences from situated visual observations. Yet existing visual and embodied question answering benchmarks often provide limited control over the reasoning dependencies being tested, making it difficult to distinguish grounded embodied reasoning from shortcut-driven visual or linguistic pattern matching. We present ERQA-Plus, a diagnostic benchmark for reasoning in embodied AI. ERQA-Plus contains 1,766 question-answer instances grounded in 711 robot-centric images and organized according to a structured taxonomy spanning perceptual, action-centric, social-interaction, navigation-environmental, and contextual commonsense reasoning. The dataset is constructed using a multi-stage generation and validation pipeline that combines taxonomy-guided question generation, automatic quality judging, iterative revision, and human assessment to improve visual grounding, answer validity, and reasoning quality. We benchmark representative general-purpose vision-language models and embodied models, including LLaVA-NeXT-8B, Prismatic-7B, MiniCPM-V-4.5-8B, Qwen3-VL, RoboRefer-8B, and RoboBrain2.5-8B. Although the strongest model, Qwen3-VL-32B, achieves 83.4% overall accuracy and 61.4 SBERT score, category-level results reveal persistent weaknesses in spatial reasoning, procedural reasoning, event prediction, and intention inference. ERQA-Plus therefore provides a fine-grained evaluation framework for measuring not only whether embodied agents answer correctly, but also which forms of embodied reasoning they can and cannot perform reliably. The dataset is available https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingdas/erqa-plus and the project page at https://github.com/LUNAProject22/erqa-plus.

Related papers

• Apodex Discovery: Reality Benchmarks and Environments for Evaluating and Building Discoverative Artificial Intelligence [86.61561123749011]
  We introduce Apodex Discovery, a framework for building and evaluating discoverative AI through the heavy-duty solver.<n>First, a problem-scouting process surveyed 561 industries across 16 sectors, assembled 423 high-value real-world problems, and selected 20 for the initial release.<n>Second, a common environment-task-episode abstraction provides data, tools, constraints, feedback, trajectory recording, and verification of intermediate artifacts and final submissions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T18:48:40Z)
• Identifying and Resolving Pitfalls of Knowledge-Based VQA Benchmarks: Auditing, Repairing, and Augmenting [11.990076788699456]
  Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) aims to evaluate whether Visual Language Models (VLMs) can retrieve, ground, and reason over external structured knowledge.<n>We show that these assumptions are systematically violated in existing KB-VQA benchmarks.<n>We introduce (1) a principled audit-and-repair protocol that restores answer derivability and question clarity, and (2) a controlled multi-entity augmentation protocol that introduces visual ambiguity to challenge initial retrieval and grounded reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T20:35:30Z)
• LADBench: A Benchmark for Logical Fault Detection in Images [1.6882040908691864]
  Large Vision Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual question answering and semantic grounding, but their capacity for autonomous logical reasoning remains underexplored.<n>Existing anomaly benchmarks emphasize visual errors or direct prompting rather than the physical and social common sense needed for open-world deployment.<n>We introduce LAD-bench, a benchmark of more than 1,000 curated synthetic images with logical anomalies across four domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T02:32:38Z)
• Embodied3DBench: Benchmarking Low-Level Embodied Spatial Intelligence of Vision Language Models [50.6415287154632]
  Embodied3DBench is a robot-centric benchmark targeting low-level spatial intelligence in 3D environments.<n>The benchmark spans 12 subcategories and contains over 21k high-quality question-answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T20:28:56Z)
• Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models [60.418191092851636]
  Omanic is an open-domain multi-hop QA resource that provides decomposed sub-questions and intermediate answers as structural annotations for analyzing reasoning processes.<n>It contains 10,296 machine-generated training examples (Omanic Synth) and 967 expert-reviewed human-annotated evaluation examples (OmanicBench)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T15:23:37Z)
• TACIT Benchmark: A Programmatic Visual Reasoning Benchmark for Generative and Discriminative Models [0.0]
  TACIT Benchmark is a programmatic visual reasoning benchmark comprising 10 tasks across 6 reasoning domains.<n>The benchmark provides dual-track evaluation: a generative track in which models must produce solution images verified through deterministic computer-vision pipelines, and a discriminative track offering five-way multiple choice with structurally plausible near-miss distractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T11:45:26Z)
• AgenticIQA: An Agentic Framework for Adaptive and Interpretable Image Quality Assessment [69.06977852423564]
  Image quality assessment (IQA) reflects both the quantification and interpretation of perceptual quality rooted in the human visual system.<n>AgenticIQA decomposes IQA into four subtasks -- distortion detection, distortion analysis, tool selection, and tool execution.<n>To support training and evaluation, we introduce AgenticIQA-200K, a large-scale instruction dataset tailored for IQA agents, and AgenticIQA-Eval, the first benchmark for assessing the planning, execution, and summarization capabilities of VLM-based IQA agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T09:37:01Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• Traceable Evidence Enhanced Visual Grounded Reasoning: Evaluation and Methodology [87.65242416688146]
  TreeBench is a diagnostic benchmark for visual grounded reasoning.<n>TreeVGR is a training paradigm to supervise localization and reasoning jointly with reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T17:59:58Z)
• Image Quality Assessment for Embodied AI [103.66095742463195]
  Embodied AI has developed rapidly in recent years, but it is still mainly deployed in laboratories.<n>There is no IQA method to assess the usability of an image in embodied tasks, namely, the perceptual quality for robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T15:51:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.