Granularity-Regulated Adaptive Computational Efficiency for Optimal Verification in Test-Time Scaling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19354v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:19:16 GMT
- Title: Granularity-Regulated Adaptive Computational Efficiency for Optimal Verification in Test-Time Scaling
- Abstract summary: Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning performance of large language models.<n>A central component of TTS is the emphverifier, which selects or scores candidate solutions to guide the search process.<n>We prove that there exists a phase transition: fine-grained verification dominates when either the compute budget is large or the problem is hard, whereas coarse-grained verification is preferred in the low-budget, easy-problem regime.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) by investing additional compute at inference time. A central component of TTS is the \emph{verifier}, which selects or scores candidate solutions to guide the search process. While prior work has explored the benefit of verification, a fundamental question remains underexplored: \emph{what is the optimal granularity of verification under a given compute budget?} Coarse-grained outcome reward models (ORMs) and fine-grained process reward models (PRMs) represent two extremes, yet neither alone achieves compute-optimality across all regimes. In this paper, we establish a unified theoretical framework, called \textbf{GRACE} (\underline{G}ranularity-\underline{R}egulated \underline{A}daptive \underline{C}omputational \underline{E}fficiency), that characterizes the optimal verification granularity as an explicit function of problem difficulty, verifier accuracy, and compute budget. We prove that there exists a phase transition: fine-grained verification dominates when either the compute budget is large or the problem is hard, whereas coarse-grained verification is preferred in the low-budget, easy-problem regime. Our theory unifies Best-of-$N$, beam search, and step-level MCTS within a single Pareto-optimality framework, and motivates an adaptive granularity strategy that provably achieves the compute-performance Pareto frontier. Empirical results on MATH-500, GSM8K, and AIME benchmarks corroborate all four theoretical claims, with our adaptive strategy outperforming fixed-granularity baselines by up to 3.1\% accuracy at matched compute.
Related papers
- SuCo: Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive Reasoning [59.17222918775686]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often generate excessively long Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT)<n>Existing efforts to mitigate this inefficiency typically rely on discrete reasoning modes or fixed budget tiers.<n>We introduce Minimal Sufficient CoT (MSC), defined as the shortest prefix of a CoT trajectory which is adequate for producing the correct answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-16T08:52:15Z) - Soft Tuy-Completeness for Robust Projection Selection in Cone-Beam CT [4.213649496201482]
This work introduces a continuous soft near-orthogonality score and a resolution-aware saturated coverage objective for projection selection in region-of-interest focused cone-beam CT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T12:37:15Z) - Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation for Reasoning LLMs via Constrained Policy Optimization [18.737087162461563]
Test-time compute scaling has become a powerful lever for improving large language model performance.<n>Yet deploying these techniques under finite inference budgets requires a decision that current systems largely ignore.<n>We formalize this as a constrained optimization problem (maximize expected accuracy subject to an average compute budget) and solve it with a two-stage Solve-then-Learn pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-16T10:39:22Z) - ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z) - Principled Algorithms for Optimizing Generalized Metrics in Binary Classification [53.604375124674796]
We introduce principled algorithms for optimizing generalized metrics, supported by $H$-consistency and finite-sample generalization bounds.<n>Our approach reformulates metric optimization as a generalized cost-sensitive learning problem.<n>We develop new algorithms, METRO, with strong theoretical performance guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T01:33:42Z) - Peering Inside the Black Box: Uncovering LLM Errors in Optimization Modelling through Component-Level Evaluation [0.0]
We present a component-level evaluation framework for large language models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate GPT-5, LLaMA 3.1 Instruct, and DeepSeek Math across optimization problems of varying complexity.<n>Results show GPT-5 consistently outperforms other models, with chain-of-thought, self-consistency, and modular prompting proving most effective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T17:47:59Z) - Rethinking Optimal Verification Granularity for Compute-Efficient Test-Time Scaling [8.593971468631613]
Test-time scaling (TTS) has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n> Verification plays a key role in TTS, simultaneously influencing (1) reasoning performance and (2) compute efficiency, due to the quality and computational cost of verification.<n>We introduce Variable Granularity Search (VG-Search), a unified algorithm that generalizes beam search and Best-of-N sampling via a tunable granularity parameter g.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T22:24:48Z) - Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism.<n>We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z) - Is Best-of-N the Best of Them? Coverage, Scaling, and Optimality in Inference-Time Alignment [54.787826863212146]
Inference-time computation offers a powerful axis for scaling the performance of language models.<n>We analyze the performance of inference-time alignment algorithms in terms of (i) response quality, and (ii) compute.<n>We introduce $textttInferenceTimePessimism$, a new algorithm which mitigates reward hacking through deliberate use of inference-time compute.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T18:00:08Z) - Best Arm Identification in Stochastic Bandits: Beyond $\beta-$optimality [31.359578768463752]
This paper investigates a hitherto unaddressed aspect of best arm identification (BAI) in multi-armed bandits in the fixed-confidence setting.
Two key metrics for assessing bandit algorithms are computational efficiency and performance optimality.
This paper introduces a framework and an algorithm for BAI that achieves optimal performance with a computationally efficient set of decision rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-10T05:02:49Z) - Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision
Processes [79.4957965474334]
We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model.
The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.