DeXposure-Claw: An Agentic System for DeFi Risk Supervision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19501v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:40:08 GMT
• Title: DeXposure-Claw: An Agentic System for DeFi Risk Supervision
• Abstract summary: General-purpose LLM agents fit this setting poorly.<n>Existing evaluations offer no regulator-aligned way to measure the resulting false alarms.<n>We introduce DeXposure-Claw, a forecast-grounded agentic supervision system.
• Score: 18.719297847519552
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Decentralized finance exposes supervisors to fast-moving, networked credit risks. General-purpose LLM agents fit this setting poorly: they over-read weak evidence and recommend high-stakes interventions, while existing evaluations offer no regulator-aligned way to measure the resulting false alarms. We introduce DeXposure-Claw, a forecast-grounded agentic supervision system that routes LLM decisions through structured evidence: (1) DeXposure-FM, a graph time-series foundation model, forecasts future exposure networks; (2) deterministic monitors and stress scenarios then turn those forecasts into typed alerts, attribution signals, and scenario evidence; and (3) data-health and confidence gates constrain escalation before DeXposure-Claw emits auditable supervisory tickets with rationales. We further develop DeXposure-Bench, a six-axis evaluation harness, whose decision axis scores tickets against a regulator-aligned absolute-loss ground truth and an explicit false-intervention rate. Experiments on five years of weekly real data fully support our system. Code is at https://github.com/EVIEHub/DeXposure-Claw.

Related papers

• Detecting Is Not Resolving: The Monitoring Control Gap in Retrieval Augmented LLMs [20.59321114618083]
  We show that single-turn diagnostics systematically overestimate RAG safety, that contradiction is uncorrelated with safe resolution, and that no universal prompt fix exists.<n>The gap between what models recognize and what they do must be measured and closed before retrieval-augmented systems can be trusted in high-stakes settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T15:18:43Z)
• Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents? [61.49434544687523]
  We introduce REFLECT, a meta-evaluation benchmark targeting fine-grained failure detection in agentic environments.<n> REFLECT defines a detailed taxonomy of process- and outcome-level failure modes, instantiated by performing controlled and localized interventions.<n>Our experiments show that even the best-performing models achieve overall accuracies below 55% across reasoning, tool-use, and report-quality failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T23:55:08Z)
• Label-Free Detection of Governance Evidence Degradation in Risk Decision Systems [0.0]
  Risk decision systems in fraud detection and credit scoring operate under structural label absence.<n>No existing framework integrates drift detection with governance evidence assessment and operational response.<n>This paper presents a label-free governance monitoring extension to the Governance Drift Toolkit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T05:46:15Z)
• LLM-Grounded Explainable AI for Supply Chain Risk Early Warning via Temporal Graph Attention Networks [0.5653106385738822]
  Disruptions at critical logistics nodes pose severe risks to global supply chains.<n>This paper proposes an evidence-grounded framework that jointly performs bottleneck prediction and faithful natural-language risk explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T05:07:40Z)
• DeXposure-FM: A Time-series, Graph Foundation Model for Credit Exposures and Stability on Decentralized Financial Networks [19.267203167142505]
  Credit exposure in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is often implicit and token-mediated, creating a dense web of inter-protocol dependencies.<n>We introduce DeXposure-FM, the first time-series, graph foundation model for measuring and forecasting inter-protocol credit exposure on DeFi networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T20:10:11Z)
• Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget [60.65072883773352]
  Reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs) enable test-time scaling, with dataset-level accuracy improving as the token budget increases.<n>We re-frame the budget setting problem as risk control, limiting the error rate while minimizing compute.<n>Our framework introduces an upper threshold that stops reasoning when the model is confident and a novel lower threshold that preemptively stops unsolvable instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T18:17:22Z)
• Prediction-Powered Risk Monitoring of Deployed Models for Detecting Harmful Distribution Shifts [51.37000123503367]
  We propose prediction-powered risk monitoring (PPRM), a semi-supervised risk-monitoring approach based on prediction-powered inference (PPI)<n>PPRM constructs anytime-valid lower bounds on the running risk by combining synthetic labels with a small set of true labels.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of PPRM through extensive experiments on image classification, large language model (LLM) and telecommunications monitoring tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T15:32:14Z)
• Gaming the Judge: Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought Can Undermine Agent Evaluation [76.5533899503582]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate agent performance.<n>We show this paradigm implicitly assumes that the agent's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning faithfully reflects both its internal reasoning and the underlying environment state.<n>We demonstrate that manipulated reasoning alone can inflate false positive rates of state-of-the-art VLM judges by up to 90% across 800 trajectories spanning diverse web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T06:07:43Z)
• LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z)
• Adaptive Attacks on Trusted Monitors Subvert AI Control Protocols [80.68060125494645]
  We study adaptive attacks by an untrusted model that knows the protocol and the monitor model.<n>We instantiate a simple adaptive attack vector by which the attacker embeds publicly known or zero-shot prompt injections in the model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T15:12:44Z)
• AT-CXR: Uncertainty-Aware Agentic Triage for Chest X-rays [12.843444405498404]
  We introduce AT-CXR, an uncertainty-aware agent for chest X-rays.<n>The system estimates per-case confidence and distributional fit, then follows a stepwise policy to issue an automated decision.<n>We evaluate two router designs that share the same inputs and actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T14:33:09Z)
• Free Lunch for Generating Effective Outlier Supervision [46.37464572099351]
  We propose an ultra-effective method to generate near-realistic outlier supervision. Our proposed textttBayesAug significantly reduces the false positive rate over 12.50% compared with the previous schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T01:46:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.