WeGenBench: A Multidimensional Diagnostic Benchmark towards Text-to-Image Model Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20100v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:20:05 GMT
• Title: WeGenBench: A Multidimensional Diagnostic Benchmark towards Text-to-Image Model Optimization
• Abstract summary: We propose WeGenBench, a novel benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of text-to-image generation capabilities.<n>Our benchmark comprises a total of 4,000 test prompts across two primary categories, meticulously balanced between Chinese and English.<n>Our approach yields both the assessment outcomes and the detailed reasoning trajectories, facilitating a rigorous verification of the accuracy and soundness of the evaluation results.
• Score: 16.83270042322323
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent text-to-image generation models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in synthesizing highly realistic images from text inputs alone. Although existing benchmarks can evaluate the generation capabilities of various models to some extent, they struggle to comprehensively and accurately measure performance across multiple dimensions, often failing to reveal the inherent deficiencies of models in specific categories. To address these limitations, we propose WeGenBench, a novel benchmark designed for the comprehensive, multi-perspective evaluation of text-to-image generation capabilities. Our benchmark comprises a total of 4,000 test prompts across two primary categories, meticulously balanced between Chinese and English to evaluate bilingual and cross-cultural generation capabilities. Beyond macroscopic scene classification, we annotate each prompt with multi-dimensional tags tailored to the distinct content and challenges of each language, thereby refining the generation tasks into more specific sub-categories. Through a cross-dimensional evaluation mechanism leveraging both scene classifications and multi-dimensional tags, WeGenBench can precisely pinpoint model shortcomings in specific generation categories. Furthermore, to measure generation quality more accurately, we design and validate several novel evaluation metrics by integrating Vision-Language Models (VLMs), which assess model performance on domain-specific tasks from three core aspects. Crucially, our approach yields both the assessment outcomes and the detailed reasoning trajectories, facilitating a rigorous verification of the accuracy and soundness of the evaluation results. Finally, we conduct systematic benchmarking on current state-of-the-art methods and provide an in-depth analysis of the limitations present in existing models.

Related papers

• VGA-Bench: A Unified Benchmark and Multi-Model Framework for Video Aesthetics and Generation Quality Evaluation [65.0648741395158]
  VGA-Bench is a unified benchmark for evaluation of video generation quality and aesthetic quality.<n>We design 1,016 diverse prompts and generate a large-scale dataset of over 60,000 videos using 12 video generation models.<n>Our models achieve reliable alignment with human judgments, offering both accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T09:44:39Z)
• UniGenBench++: A Unified Semantic Evaluation Benchmark for Text-to-Image Generation [40.644151228285246]
  We introduce UniGenBench++, a unified semantic assessment benchmark for text-to-image generation.<n>It comprises 600 prompts organized hierarchically to ensure both coverage and efficiency.<n>It provides both English and Chinese versions of each prompt in short and long forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T14:56:46Z)
• OneIG-Bench: Omni-dimensional Nuanced Evaluation for Image Generation [23.05106664412349]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have garnered significant attention for generating high-quality images aligned with text prompts.<n>OneIG-Bench is a benchmark framework for evaluation of T2I models across multiple dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:50:21Z)
• Movie2Story: A framework for understanding videos and telling stories in the form of novel text [0.0]
  We propose a novel benchmark to evaluate text generation capabilities in scenarios enriched with auxiliary information.<n>Our work introduces an innovative automatic dataset generation method to ensure the availability of accurate auxiliary information.<n>Our experiments reveal that current Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) perform suboptimally under the proposed evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T15:44:04Z)
• Beyond Coarse-Grained Matching in Video-Text Retrieval [50.799697216533914]
  We introduce a new approach for fine-grained evaluation. Our approach can be applied to existing datasets by automatically generating hard negative test captions. Experiments on our fine-grained evaluations demonstrate that this approach enhances a model's ability to understand fine-grained differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T09:42:29Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models [70.19437817951673]
  We argue that it is hard to judge the large conditional generative models from the simple metrics since these models are often trained on very large datasets with multi-aspect abilities. Our approach involves generating a diverse and comprehensive list of 700 prompts for text-to-video generation. Then, we evaluate the state-of-the-art video generative models on our carefully designed benchmark, in terms of visual qualities, content qualities, motion qualities, and text-video alignment with 17 well-selected objective metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T17:50:46Z)
• Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluation [82.31575622685902]
  A document summary's quality can be assessed by human annotators on various criteria, both objective ones like grammar and correctness, and subjective ones like informativeness, succinctness, and appeal. Most of the automatic evaluation methods like BLUE/ROUGE may be not able to adequately capture the above dimensions. We propose a new evaluation framework based on LLMs, which provides a comprehensive evaluation framework by comparing generated text and reference text from both objective and subjective aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T10:40:59Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.