Easy Reads: A Python program for making Scientific Papers on arXiv more Reader Friendly and Accessible
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20550v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:57:26 GMT
- Title: Easy Reads: A Python program for making Scientific Papers on arXiv more Reader Friendly and Accessible
- Abstract summary: Easy Reads is an automated, end-to-end, open-source Python program that makes papers from arXiv more reader-friendly and accessible.<n>The main goal of Easy Reads is to facilitate ease of reading of scientific papers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Scientific papers are frequently dense and characterized by features such as small fonts and line spacing, double columns of text, and tightly arranged figures. While these features make papers more compact, they can hinder readability, make them less accessible, and can strain the reader. arXiv is a premier open-access repository for scientific papers across different fields and is used extensively by researchers, including those in the physics and astrophysics communities. Easy Reads is an automated, end-to-end, open-source Python program that helps address the stated challenge by making papers from arXiv more reader-friendly and accessible. Easy Reads can automatically fetch a paper from arXiv via its URL and work with the source TeX file to allow custom formatting of the paper features, primarily the font size, and the number of columns used. The main goal of Easy Reads is to facilitate ease of reading of scientific papers.
Related papers
- Code as Representation: A Compilable Parsing Paradigm for Academic Documents [50.40789738182074]
Compilable Academic Document Parsing (CADP) is a paradigm that reconstructs a full page as contextual La plus executable Python.<n>We introduce CADP-Bench, an expert-verified benchmark of full academic pages containing text and multiple SAE types.<n>Results show that even frontier models still struggle to produce high-fidelity executable reconstructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-18T09:10:43Z) - Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration [59.22667222947257]
textbfAgents-K1 is an end-to-end knowledge orchestration pipeline.<n>It converts raw documents into agent-native scientific knowledge graphs.<n>We process 2.46 million scientific papers across six subjects to produce textbfScholar-KG, of which we release a one-million-paper subset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T17:58:35Z) - WisPaper: Your AI Scholar Search Engine [55.07907253175705]
textscWisPaper is an intelligent academic retrieval and literature management platform.<n>It provides a closed-loop workflow that seamlessly connects literature discovery, management, and continuous tracking of research frontiers.<n>The platform is publicly accessible and serves researchers across academia and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-07T15:10:20Z) - GraphMind: Interactive Novelty Assessment System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery [20.945875851329244]
$textbfGraphMind$ is an easy-to-use interactive web tool designed to assist users in evaluating the novelty of scientific papers or drafted ideas.<n>$textbfGraphMind$ enables users to capture the main structure of a scientific paper, explore related ideas through various perspectives, and assess novelty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T14:49:07Z) - ArXivBench: When You Should Avoid Using ChatGPT for Academic Writing [6.586119023242877]
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in reasoning and question answering.<n>Their tendency to generate factually incorrect content remains a critical challenge.<n>This study evaluates proprietary and open-source LLMs on generating relevant research papers with accurate arXiv links.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-06T05:00:10Z) - Learning Multiplex Representations on Text-Attributed Graphs with One Language Model Encoder [55.24276913049635]
We propose METAG, a new framework for learning Multiplex rEpresentations on Text-Attributed Graphs.
In contrast to existing methods, METAG uses one text encoder to model the shared knowledge across relations.
We conduct experiments on nine downstream tasks in five graphs from both academic and e-commerce domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T14:59:22Z) - SciLit: A Platform for Joint Scientific Literature Discovery,
Summarization and Citation Generation [11.186252009101077]
We propose SciLit, a pipeline that automatically recommends relevant papers, extracts highlights, and suggests a reference sentence as a citation of a paper.
SciLit efficiently recommends papers from large databases of hundreds of millions of papers using a two-stage pre-fetching and re-ranking literature search system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T09:34:45Z) - The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform [92.2948743167744]
Semantic Scholar (S2) is an open data platform and website aimed at accelerating science by helping scholars discover and understand scientific literature.<n>We combine public and proprietary data sources using state-of-the-art techniques for scholarly PDF content extraction and automatic knowledge graph construction.<n>The graph includes advanced semantic features such as structurally parsed text, natural language summaries, and vector embeddings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-24T17:13:08Z) - Cracking Double-Blind Review: Authorship Attribution with Deep Learning [43.483063713471935]
We propose a transformer-based, neural-network architecture to attribute an anonymous manuscript to an author.
We leverage all research papers publicly available on arXiv amounting to over 2 million manuscripts.
Our method achieves an unprecedented authorship attribution accuracy, where up to 73% of papers are attributed correctly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T15:50:24Z) - arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific
Writing [17.63505461444103]
We provide a complete computational framework for studying text revision in scientific writing.
We first introduce arXivEdits, a new annotated corpus of 751 full papers from arXiv with gold sentence alignment across their multiple versions of revision.
It supports our data-driven analysis to unveil the common strategies practiced by researchers for revising their papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T22:50:24Z) - CitationIE: Leveraging the Citation Graph for Scientific Information
Extraction [89.33938657493765]
We use the citation graph of referential links between citing and cited papers.
We observe a sizable improvement in end-to-end information extraction over the state-of-the-art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T03:00:12Z) - Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph.
We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains.
Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z) - ParaSCI: A Large Scientific Paraphrase Dataset for Longer Paraphrase
Generation [78.10924968931249]
ParaSCI is the first large-scale paraphrase dataset in the scientific field.
This dataset includes 33,981 paraphrase pairs from ACL (ParaSCI-ACL) and 316,063 pairs from arXiv (ParaSCI-arXiv)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-21T01:10:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.