Evolutionary Discovery of Developmental Reward Schedules in Deep Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20858v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:47:26 GMT
• Title: Evolutionary Discovery of Developmental Reward Schedules in Deep Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We propose an evolutionary framework for discovering developmental reward schedules.<n>Agency, novelty, and reactivity are combined through time-varying weights.<n>Our results position evolutionary optimization as a promising approach for developmental reward schedule discovery.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The temporal structure of reward composition in reinforcement learning (RL) is typically hand-designed and held fixed throughout training, leaving the progression of motivational priorities largely unexplored. In this work, we propose an evolutionary framework for discovering developmental reward schedules, in which three distinct biologically inspired motivational components -- agency, novelty, and reactivity -- are combined through time-varying weights that dynamically shift over the course of training. Evaluated on two sparse-reward MiniGrid tasks: DoorKey-6x6 and KeyCorridorS3R1, our framework compares the generalizability of four evolutionary algorithms: CMA-ES, xNES, DE, and L-SHADE against an extrinsically motivated baseline (our main comparison point), and three additional hand-designed methods. On DoorKey-6x6, all evolved methods outperform the non-evolved baselines, with L-SHADE achieving the best performance -- an approximate relative mean improvement of 11.4% over the extrinsic only baseline. On KeyCorridorS3R1, CMA-ES achieves the best overall performance, with the remaining evolved methods showing weaker and less reliable generalization capability compared to the extrinsic only baseline. Interestingly, the discovered schedules diverge from our defined developmental ordering, with novelty consistently emerging as the dominant early signal during training, across both tasks. Collectively, our results position evolutionary optimization as a promising approach for developmental reward schedule discovery in deep reinforcement learning, and suggest that what evolution finds to be optimal in computational settings may differ from what it finds to be optimal in biology. The code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/alannadels/Evolutionary_RL.git.

Related papers

• Teaching LLMs to Self-Evolve: Cultivating Core Meta-Skills with Reinforcement Learning [51.17262419591891]
  Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains.<n>We present MetaEvolve, a framework designed to develop these meta-skills via a data synthesis pipeline, evolution-aware reinforcement learning, and inference-time evolutionary search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T04:35:29Z)
• CoTEvol: Self-Evolving Chain-of-Thoughts for Data Synthesis in Mathematical Reasoning [56.866286835885994]
  We propose CoTEvol, a genetic evolutionary framework that casts Chain-of-Thought generation as a population-based search over reasoning trajectories.<n>Lightweight, task-aware fitness functions are designed to guide the evolutionary process toward accurate and diverse reasoning.<n> Empirically, CoTEvol improves correct-CoT synthesis success by over 30% and enhances structural diversity, with markedly improved efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T08:29:22Z)
• CORAL: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Evolution for Open-Ended Discovery [67.47220507982522]
  Large language model (LLM)-based evolution is a promising approach for openended discovery.<n>We present CORAL, the first framework for autonomous multi-agent evolution on open-ended problems.<n>CORAL replaces rigid control with long-running agents that explore, reflect, and collaborate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T05:59:06Z)
• Controlled Self-Evolution for Algorithmic Code Optimization [33.82967000330864]
  Self-evolution methods enhance code generation through iterative "generate-verify-refine" cycles.<n>Existing approaches fail to discover solutions with superior complexity within limited budgets.<n>We propose Controlled Self-Evolution (CSE), which consists of three key components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T09:23:13Z)
• Differentiable Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning [41.96953381133274]
  We propose Differentiable Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (DERL), a bilevel framework that enables the autonomous discovery of optimal reward signals.<n>DERL is differentiable in its metaoptimization: it treats the inner-loop validation performance as a signal to update the Meta-r via reinforcement learning.<n> Experimental results show that DERL achieves state-of-the-art performance on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld, significantly outperforming methods relying on rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T14:50:08Z)
• ThetaEvolve: Test-time Learning on Open Problems [110.5756538358217]
  We introduce ThetaEvolve, an open-source framework that simplifies and extends AlphaEvolve to efficiently scale both in-context learning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) at test time.<n>We find that ThetaEvolve with RL at test-time consistently outperforms inference-only baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T18:58:14Z)
• Learning to Reason as Action Abstractions with Scalable Mid-Training RL [55.24192942739207]
  An effective mid-training phase should identify a compact set of useful actions and enable fast selection.<n>We propose Reasoning as Action Abstractions (RA3), a scalable mid-training algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T05:34:20Z)
• Evolving Reservoirs for Meta Reinforcement Learning [1.6874375111244329]
  We propose a computational model for studying a mechanism that can enable such a process. At the evolutionary scale, we evolve reservoirs, a family of recurrent neural networks. We employ these evolved reservoirs to facilitate the learning of a behavioral policy through Reinforcement Learning (RL) Our results show that the evolution of reservoirs can improve the learning of diverse challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T16:11:48Z)
• DARLEI: Deep Accelerated Reinforcement Learning with Evolutionary Intelligence [77.78795329701367]
  We present DARLEI, a framework that combines evolutionary algorithms with parallelized reinforcement learning. We characterize DARLEI's performance under various conditions, revealing factors impacting diversity of evolved morphologies. We hope to extend DARLEI in future work to include interactions between diverse morphologies in richer environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T16:51:10Z)
• Learning to Optimize for Reinforcement Learning [58.01132862590378]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is essentially different from supervised learning, and in practice, these learneds do not work well even in simple RL tasks. Agent-gradient distribution is non-independent and identically distributed, leading to inefficient meta-training. We show that, although only trained in toy tasks, our learned can generalize unseen complex tasks in Brax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T00:11:02Z)
• Lineage Evolution Reinforcement Learning [15.469857142001482]
  Lineage evolution reinforcement learning is a derivative algorithm which accords with the general agent population learning system. Our experiments show that the idea of evolution with lineage improves the performance of original reinforcement learning algorithm in some games in Atari 2600.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T11:58:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.