Leveraging Large Language Models to Obscure Code Stylometry: A Comparative Study of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22306v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 02:19:45 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Large Language Models to Obscure Code Stylometry: A Comparative Study of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 have introduced new dimensions to this field.<n>This study investigates the effectiveness of LLMs in altering code stylometry while preserving functionality.<n>Results reveal significant differences in effectiveness between single-shot and multi-shot methods.
• Score: 2.8492827625814363
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving field of software development, code stylometry analyzing unique stylistic signatures of programmers plays a crit-ical role in authorship attribution and cybersecurity. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, have introduced new dimensions to this field, challenging traditional stylometry techniques. This study investigates the effectiveness of LLMs in altering code stylometry while preserving functionality and evaluates the impact of various prompt engineering strategies. Through comprehensive experiments, we assess how well these models can obscure stylistic signatures to avoid detection by a Random Forest classifier trained for authorship attribution. The results reveal significant differences in effectiveness between single-shot and multi-shot methods and highlight the importance of detailed, structured prompts. Additionally, functionality preservation checks demonstrate the challenges in maintaining code integrity post-modification. This research provides critical insights into the robustness of authorship attribution techniques against advanced AI capabilities, informing future cybersecurity and software engineering developments

Related papers

• Do Influence Tactics Matter? Investigating Prompt Framing Effects in LLM Code Generation [2.900536834599724]
  This study investigates whether different psychology-based communication strategies that humans use to persuade or motivate others can lead to more effective prompt framing.<n>We operationalized eight influence tactics (like rational persuasion, ingratiation, and exchange) into reproducible prompt templates.<n>We assessed the resulting code output on four key software quality dimensions: functional correctness, quality, maintainability, and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T23:57:06Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods [11.454777386934632]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated code generation has enhanced software development efficiency, but often at the cost of security.<n>We present a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the security quality of LLM-generated code across five LLMs and four programming languages.<n>We introduce a weaknesses-aware zero-shot chain-of-thought (WA-0CoT) prompting strategy that enriches prompts with security context using CWE mappings to guide model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T23:52:33Z)
• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• Ensembling Large Language Models for Code Vulnerability Detection: An Empirical Evaluation [69.8237598448941]
  This study investigates the potential of ensemble learning to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in source code vulnerability detection.<n>We propose Dynamic Gated Stacking (DGS), a Stacking variant tailored for vulnerability detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T03:48:22Z)
• A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents [61.474191493322415]
  Code generation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the software development paradigm.<n>LLMs are characterized by three core features.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of the field of LLM-based code generation agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T18:17:36Z)
• Reassessing Code Authorship Attribution in the Era of Language Models [12.590406993068523]
  This study aims to analyze coding styles to identify the authors of code samples.<n>Code Authorship Attribution (CAA) is crucial in cybersecurity and software for addressing, detecting plagiarism, and supporting criminal prosecutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T16:19:30Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Prompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigation [4.777102838267181]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are gaining momentum in software development with prompt-driven programming.<n>We investigate the impact of different prompting techniques on the security of code generated from NL instructions by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:38:03Z)
• A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs [72.65956436513241]
  Decoding methods play an indispensable role in converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers. This paper provides a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of various decoding methods within the context of large language models. Our findings reveal that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent and influenced by factors such as alignment, model size, and quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T11:14:53Z)
• Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models [1.6006550105523192]
  Review explores the pivotal role of prompt engineering in unleashing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Examines both foundational and advanced methodologies of prompt engineering, including techniques such as self-consistency, chain-of-thought, and generated knowledge.<n>Discusses the aspect of AI security, particularly adversarial attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T09:15:18Z)
• A LLM Assisted Exploitation of AI-Guardian [57.572998144258705]
  We evaluate the robustness of AI-Guardian, a recent defense to adversarial examples published at IEEE S&P 2023. We write none of the code to attack this model, and instead prompt GPT-4 to implement all attack algorithms following our instructions and guidance. This process was surprisingly effective and efficient, with the language model at times producing code from ambiguous instructions faster than the author of this paper could have done.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:33:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.