Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Can Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22317v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 03:15:25 GMT
• Title: Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Can Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model
• Abstract summary: We present a boundary-aware Curriculum RL approach to move beyond the base model's reasoning capacity boundary.<n>Across Qwen, Llama, and DeepSeek base models, boundary-aware Curriculum RL improves both pass@1 scores and pass@256 scores.
• Score: 14.207229228233958
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is widely viewed as a promising path toward continuously improving large language models. Recent works, however, suggest that mainstream RLVR often reallocates sampling probabilities among trajectories already present in the base model: it can improve sampling efficiency, reflected by higher pass@1 scores, but yields limited gains, and can even decrease pass@k scores when k is large, and therefore may fail to expand the base model's reasoning capacity boundary. In this paper, we present a boundary-aware Curriculum RL approach to move beyond the base model's reasoning capacity boundary. Our approach first uses pass@k sampling to locate the current reasoning capacity boundary, then applies targeted teacher guidance to examples near or beyond that boundary, and finally uses RL to consolidate the newly introduced reasoning patterns. Across Qwen, Llama, and DeepSeek base models, boundary-aware Curriculum RL improves both pass@1 scores and pass@256 scores, with pass@1 reflecting one-attempt performance and pass@256 serving as an empirical proxy for the reasoning capacity boundary. In our experiments, average pass@256 improves by 9.8 percentage points over the base models and by 10.3 percentage points over Vanilla RLVR. These results suggest that boundary-aware Curriculum RL can provide a scalable route for LLMs to continuously improve beyond the base model's empirical reasoning capacity boundary.

Related papers

• Understanding Diversity Collapse in RLVR via the Lens of Overtraining [78.37408098404312]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a key approach for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models.<n>We formalize this diversity collapse through the lens of emphovertraining<n>We propose emphBayesian Boundary Gating (BBG) which redirects optimization away from overtraining by estimating each problem's marginal contribution to the reasoning boundary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T20:13:37Z)
• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• SPS: Steering Probability Squeezing for Better Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models [51.99912169291891]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training reasoning-oriented models.<n>We propose a training paradigm that interleaves conventional RL with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>Our findings suggest that alternating between RL and IRL offers an effective pathway toward extending the exploration capacity of reasoning-oriented large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T13:49:47Z)
• Unlocking Reasoning Capabilities in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning Exploration [8.839121572048018]
  We propose RAPO, an algorithm to promote broader yet focused exploration.<n>We train Qwen2.5-3B and 7B models with RAPO on the 8K SimpleRL-Zero dataset.<n>Results show that RAPO consistently improves problem-solving performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T16:22:19Z)
• ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models [89.37819814048288]
  We introduce ProRL, a novel training methodology that incorporates KL divergence control, reference policy, and a diverse suite of tasks.<n>Our empirical analysis reveals that RL-trained models consistently outperform base resetting models across a wide range of pass@k evaluations.<n>These findings offer new insights into the conditions under which RL meaningfully expands reasoning boundaries in language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T17:59:01Z)
• Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model? [66.61292196146016]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently demonstrated notable success in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>This study critically examines the current state of RLVR.<n>We find that the current training setup does not elicit fundamentally new reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T17:59:56Z)
• Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model [47.108822717757945]
  We introduce Open-Reasoner-Zero, the first open source implementation of large-scale reasoning-oriented RL training on the base model.<n>We demonstrate that PPO with GAE and straightforward rule-based rewards, without any KL regularization, is sufficient to scale up both benchmark performance and response length.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T16:36:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.