Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22565v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:59:41 GMT
• Title: Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a standard method for improving reasoning capabilities in large language models.<n>This paper systematically investigates what can multimodal CoT do, and where and why it falls short.
• Score: 37.70222730556387
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a standard method for improving reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) by eliciting step-by-step thinking, but its effectiveness in multimodal tasks remains unclear. In this paper, we aim to systematically investigate the key question: What can multimodal Chain-of-Thought reasoning do, and where and why does it fall short? To this end, we evaluate 12 multimodal tasks across perception and reasoning categories using both 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. Our analysis reveals several important findings: (1) CoT is not a free lunch and should be used selectively depending on the specific requirements of each task. For perception tasks, CoT can lead to undesirable side effects, such as reduced performance in visual grounding and object counting. In contrast, it proves effective for reasoning tasks involving mathematical, scientific, and multi-image reasoning; (2) Compared to original models, existing open-source multimodal reasoning models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities; (3) Visual reasoning remains a key bottleneck for current multimodal CoT, as models exhibit a Look Light, Think Heavy pattern where verbal reflection rises and falls during reasoning, whereas visual reflection consistently diminishes. These findings suggest that while multimodal CoT handles verbal reflection relatively well, it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process.

Related papers

• Walk the Talk: Bridging the Reasoning-Action Gap for Thinking with Images via Multimodal Agentic Policy Optimization [89.68681087743876]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have incentivized models to think with images'' by actively invoking visual tools during multi-turn reasoning.<n>The common Reinforcement Learning practice of relying on outcome-based rewards ignores the fact that textual plausibility often masks executive failure.<n>We introduce Multimodal Agentic Policy Optimization (MAPO), bridging the gap between textual reasoning and visual actions generated by models within their Multimodal Chain-of-Thought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T07:48:07Z)
• See It, Say It, Sorted: An Iterative Training-Free Framework for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning in LVLMs [24.90876091319589]
  We present an iterative, training-free, plug-and-play framework for visually-grounded multimodal reasoning.<n>Our key idea is to supervise each reasoning step at test time with visual evidence.<n>Our method achieves 16.5%-29.5% improvements on TreeBench and 13.7% RH-AUC gains on RH-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T02:13:59Z)
• Deep But Reliable: Advancing Multi-turn Reasoning for Thinking with Images [53.373427633330515]
  We propose DRIM, a model that enables deep but reliable multi-turn reasoning when thinking with images in its multimodal CoT.<n>Based on a high-resolution image dataset, we construct high-difficulty and verifiable visual question-answer pairs.<n>In the SFT stage, we collect tool trajectories as cold-start data, guiding a multi-turn reasoning pattern.<n>In the RL stage, we introduce redundancy-penalized policy optimization, which incentivizes the model to develop a self-reflective reasoning pattern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T07:44:43Z)
• ROVER: Benchmarking Reciprocal Cross-Modal Reasoning for Omnimodal Generation [79.17352367219736]
  ROVER tests the use of one modality to guide, verify, or refine outputs in the other.<n>ROVER is a human-annotated benchmark that explicitly targets reciprocal cross-modal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T02:27:46Z)
• ThinkMorph: Emergent Properties in Multimodal Interleaved Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [76.95203056566191]
  Multimodal reasoning requires iterative coordination between language and vision, yet it remains unclear what constitutes a meaningful interleaved chain of thought.<n>We build ThinkMorph, a unified model fine-tuned on approximately 24K high-quality interleaved reasoning traces spanning tasks with varying visual engagement.<n>ThinkMorph learns to generate progressive text-image reasoning steps that concretely manipulate visual content while maintaining coherent verbal logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T17:51:38Z)
• BLINK-Twice: You see, but do you observe? A Reasoning Benchmark on Visual Perception [67.89135437537179]
  We introduce BLINK-Twice, a vision-centric reasoning benchmark grounded in challenging perceptual tasks.<n>Instead of relying on external knowledge, our tasks require models to reason from visual content alone.<n>Compared to prior perception benchmarks, it moves beyond shallow perception and requires fine-grained observation and analytical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T13:14:13Z)
• GThinker: Towards General Multimodal Reasoning via Cue-Guided Rethinking [35.14983424309319]
  We present GThinker, a novel reasoning MLLM excelling in multimodal reasoning across general scenarios, mathematics, and science.<n>GThinker introduces Cue-Rethinking, a flexible reasoning pattern that grounds inferences in visual cues and iteratively reinterprets these cues to resolve inconsistencies.<n>To support the training, we construct GThinker-11K, comprising 7K high-quality, iteratively-annotated reasoning paths and 4K curated reinforcement learning samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T16:28:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.