EXPO-SQL: Execution-based Clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to-SQL

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23693v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:33:16 GMT
• Title: EXPO-SQL: Execution-based Clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to-SQL
• Abstract summary: Text-to- querying enables users to query databases using natural language.<n>Existing Large Language Models based reinforcement learning methods treat correct and incorrect clauses equally.<n>We propose EXPO- (EXecution-based clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to- querying) which provides fine-grained supervision through clause-level rewards.
• Score: 30.5119607116771
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Text-to-SQL enables users to query databases using natural language by generating executable SQL queries. Recent methods have increasingly adopted Large Language Models based reinforcement learning (RL) to leverage execution feedback for training. However, existing RL methods assign uniform query-level rewards to all clauses in a SQL query, treating correct and incorrect clauses equally. This coarse-grained reward design leads to insufficient learning signals for correct SQL generation. To address this issue, we propose EXPO-SQL (EXecution-based clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to-SQL) which provides fine-grained supervision through clause-level rewards. To assign clause-level rewards, our method identifies erroneous clauses by analyzing execution results, including error messages and clause-wise incremental execution. Experiments on widely-used Text-to-SQL benchmarks demonstrate that EXPO-SQL significantly outperforms existing supervised fine-tuning, prompting, and RL-based methods through fine-grained clause-level learning. Our code is available at https://github. com/jhn25/EXPO-SQL.

Related papers

• SERL-SQL: Selective Hindsight Distillation for Text-to-SQL Reinforcement Agentic Learning [11.822926017805024]
  SERL- is a selective execution-grounded reinforcement learning framework for multi-turn Text-to- agents.<n>Uses a training-only teacher to re-score student actions with execution feedback.<n>Experiments show that SERL- achieves competitive performance, reaching 76.56% execution accuracy on Spider-Test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T07:24:12Z)
• Progress-SQL: Improving Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL via Progressive Rewards [24.99757788407821]
  We propose a multi-turn reinforcement learning framework with progressive rewards for Text-to-generation.<n>Our method consistently improves Text-to-generation robustness performance across both primary and evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T01:59:03Z)
• CAPER: Clause-Aligned Process Supervision for Text-to-SQL [11.286563956844946]
  We propose CAPER, which automatically derives clause-level supervision via counterfactual intervention on the SQL abstract syntax tree.<n>The resulting data is used to train CAPER-9B, a lightweight Clause-boundary feedback for policy optimization and candidate verification.<n> Experiments on BIRD and Spider show that clause-aligned supervision not only improves execution accuracy, achieving up to a 15.3% relative EX improvement over GPT-5.4, but also strengthens failure-localization capability, reaching 84.53% accuracy and 90.60% MRR on held-out failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T08:35:40Z)
• FINER-SQL: Boosting Small Language Models for Text-to-SQL [40.19592881059662]
  Large language models suffer from high computational cost, long latency, and data privacy concerns.<n>A natural alternative is to use small language models, which enable efficient and private on-premise deployment.<n>We propose FINER-sql, a scalable and reusable reinforcement learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T07:51:29Z)
• R$^3$-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQL [55.967050404665606]
  R$3$- achieves 75.03 execution accuracy on BIRD-dev, a new state of the art among methods using models with disclosed sizes, with consistent gains across five benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T07:40:50Z)
• CogniSQL-R1-Zero: Lightweight Reinforced Reasoning for Efficient SQL Generation [1.169202600932732]
  We introduce Cogni-R1-Zero, a reinforcement learning (RL) framework and model.<n>We use a lightweight reward signal based on execution correctness and format-tag compliance.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art execution accuracy on Text2 benchmark.<n>To support further research in efficient and interpretable Text-to-code modeling, we release two curated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T14:17:07Z)
• SQLens: An End-to-End Framework for Error Detection and Correction in Text-to-SQL [20.93676525997898]
  We propose an end-to-end framework for fine-grained detection and correction of semantic errors in large language models (LLMs) generated by text-to-the-box systems.<n>We show that our framework outperforms the best LLM-based self-evaluation method by 25.78% in F1 for error detection, and improves execution accuracy of out-of-the-box systems by up to 20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T22:25:47Z)
• DAC: Decomposed Automation Correction for Text-to-SQL [51.48239006107272]
  We introduce De Automation Correction (DAC), which corrects text-to-composed by decomposing entity linking and skeleton parsing. We show that our method improves performance by $3.7%$ on average of Spider, Bird, and KaggleDBQA compared with the baseline method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T14:43:15Z)
• SQLPrompt: In-Context Text-to-SQL with Minimal Labeled Data [54.69489315952524]
  "Prompt" is designed to improve the few-shot prompting capabilities of Text-to-LLMs. "Prompt" outperforms previous approaches for in-context learning with few labeled data by a large margin. We show that emphPrompt outperforms previous approaches for in-context learning with few labeled data by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T05:24:06Z)
• SQL-PaLM: Improved Large Language Model Adaptation for Text-to-SQL (extended) [53.95151604061761]
  This paper introduces the framework for enhancing Text-to- filtering using large language models (LLMs) With few-shot prompting, we explore the effectiveness of consistency decoding with execution-based error analyses. With instruction fine-tuning, we delve deep in understanding the critical paradigms that influence the performance of tuned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T21:39:05Z)
• UNITE: A Unified Benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation [72.72040379293718]
  We introduce a UNIfied benchmark for Text-to-domain systems. It is composed of publicly available text-to-domain datasets and 29K databases. Compared to the widely used Spider benchmark, we introduce a threefold increase in SQL patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T17:19:52Z)
• Weakly Supervised Text-to-SQL Parsing through Question Decomposition [53.22128541030441]
  We take advantage of the recently proposed question meaning representation called QDMR. Given questions, their QDMR structures (annotated by non-experts or automatically predicted) and the answers, we are able to automatically synthesizesql queries. Our results show that the weakly supervised models perform competitively with those trained on NL- benchmark data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-12T20:02:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.