Quantifying Prior Dominance in RAG Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23695v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:38:24 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Prior Dominance in RAG Systems
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Normalized Context Utilization (NCU) metric to quantify contextual information gain.<n>We evaluate architectures ranging from 1.5B to 72B parameters alongside a proprietary commercial API.<n>Our findings highlight the structural advantage and superior contextual adherence of SLMs in strict extraction.
• Score: 1.9544213396776273
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds Large Language Models in external knowledge, yet current evaluations rely on discrete heuristics that suffer from ''epistemic blindness'' - failing to distinguish genuine contextual information extraction from parametric memory recall. To address this, we introduce the Normalized Context Utilization (NCU) metric, leveraging continuous token log-probabilities across zero-shot, oracle, and adversarial conditions to strictly quantify contextual information gain. Evaluating architectures ranging from 1.5B to 72B parameters alongside a proprietary commercial API reveals that for strict factual extraction (without Chain-of-Thought reasoning), traditional scaling laws exhibit extreme diminishing returns: highly efficient Small Language Models (SLMs) match or outperform high-capacity architectures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ``Prior Dominance'' correlates with model scale and proprietary alignments. The evaluated commercial API not only overrode explicit external evidence in nearly half of adversarial conflicts, but also frequently suffered from systemic confidence collapse (Negative Transfer) when its parametric priors were contradicted. Our findings highlight the structural epistemic advantage and superior contextual adherence of SLMs in strict extraction workflows.

Related papers

• Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting [0.0]
  We present Loom, a generative consensus framework deployed for real-world Root Cause Analysis (RCA)<n>We show how Loom aggregates open-form hypotheses emitted by modular$s by projecting them into a continuous embedding space, and resolves conflicting signals with an iterative centroid-based reweighting algorithm.<n>We discuss our deployment experience, highlighting lessons learned regarding the trade-offs between agentic depth and inference latency, negative results in redundancy detection, and how deterministic consensus fosters trust among Subject Matter Experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T14:24:32Z)
• DUD: Decoupled Update Dynamics for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [16.097057987606714]
  We introduce textbfDecoupled textbfUpdate textbfDynamics textbf(DUD), a framework that explicitly decouples FFN and Attention contributions via noise-induced causal interventions.<n>By quantifying the independent restoration capabilities of each module, we construct a dual-stream dynamic profile that captures the model's internal fragility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T10:04:33Z)
• Perception Without Engagement: Dissecting the Causal Discovery Deficit in LMMs [68.58207076756237]
  We introduce ProCauEval, a perturbation-based evaluation protocol that shifts from outcome assessment to mechanism diagnosis.<n>We find that models faithfully perceive video content yet systematically underexploit it during causal reasoning.<n>We propose Anti-Distillation Policy Optimization (ADPO), a reinforcement learning framework built on negative teacher alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T08:48:58Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Hit-RAG: Learning to Reason with Long Contexts via Preference Alignment [97.55382322103986]
  Hit-RAG is a multi-stage preference alignment framework designed to resolve cognitive bottlenecks.<n>Our approach systematically refines the utilization of external evidence via three distinct stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T04:05:27Z)
• Scalable Contrastive Causal Discovery under Unknown Soft Interventions [3.165716101116899]
  We propose a scalable causal discovery model for paired observational and interventional settings with shared underlying causal structure and unknown soft interventions.<n> Experiments on synthetic data demonstrate improved causal structure recovery, generalization to unseen graphs with held-out causal mechanisms, and scalability to larger graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:16:16Z)
• A Researcher's Guide to Empirical Risk Minimization [3.891921282474929]
  This guide provides a reference for high-probability regret bounds in empirical risk minimization.<n>We begin with intuition and general proof strategies, then state broadly applicable guarantees under high-level conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T02:26:23Z)
• Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) offer transformative potential for high-stakes domains like finance and law.<n>Their tendency to hallucinate, generating factually incorrect or unsupported content, poses a critical reliability risk.<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for hallucination management, built on a continuous improvement cycle driven by root cause awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T23:19:37Z)
• Lost in the Noise: How Reasoning Models Fail with Contextual Distractors [57.31788955167306]
  Recent advances in reasoning models and agentic AI systems have led to an increased reliance on diverse external information.<n>We introduce NoisyBench, a comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates model robustness across 11 datasets in RAG, reasoning, alignment, and tool-use tasks.<n>Our evaluation reveals a catastrophic performance drop of up to 80% in state-of-the-art models when faced with contextual distractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:43:51Z)
• Hallucination Benchmark for Speech Foundation Models [33.92968426403491]
  Hallucinations in automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems refer to fluent and coherent transcriptions produced by neural ASR models that are completely unrelated to the underlying acoustic input (i.e., the speech signal)<n>This apparent coherence can mislead subsequent processing stages and introduce serious risks, particularly in critical domains such as healthcare and law.<n>We introduce SHALLOW, the first benchmark framework that systematically categorizes and quantifies hallucination phenomena in ASR along four complementary axes: lexical, phonetic, morphological, and semantic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T16:26:16Z)
• Does More Inference-Time Compute Really Help Robustness? [50.47666612618054]
  We show that small-scale, open-source models can benefit from inference-time scaling.<n>We identify an important security risk, intuitively motivated and empirically verified as an inverse scaling law.<n>We urge practitioners to carefully weigh these subtle trade-offs before applying inference-time scaling in security-sensitive, real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T18:08:38Z)
• A Causal View of Entity Bias in (Large) Language Models [42.64248130399508]
  We propose causal intervention techniques to mitigate entity bias for both white-box and black-box settings. Under the white-box setting, our training-time intervention improves OOD performance of PLMs on relation extraction (RE) and machine reading comprehension (MRC) by 5.7 points and by 9.1 points, respectively. Under the black-box setting, our in-context intervention effectively reduces the entity-based knowledge conflicts of GPT-3.5, achieving up to 20.5 points of improvement of exact match accuracy on MRC and up to 17.6 points of reduction in memorization ratio on RE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T03:59:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.