Enhancing Clinician Decision-Making via Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Expert Fusion for Stroke Rehabilitation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24960v1
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:00:15 GMT
- Title: Enhancing Clinician Decision-Making via Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Expert Fusion for Stroke Rehabilitation
- Abstract summary: We present xAARA: an engine designed to augment rather than replace clinical judgment.<n>xAARA returns ARAT assessments with calibrated uncertainty and explanations across task, movement-phase, and movement-quality levels.<n>In 105 stroke survivors (788 exercises), xAARA achieved 94.2% task accuracy and 81.3% movement-phase accuracy.
- Score: 0.32553561239735207
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Tailoring stroke rehabilitation requires assessing how movements are organized, not merely if they succeed. Currently, this assessment is a rate-limiting bottleneck. Instruments like the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) compress rich behavioral observations into single ordinal endpoints, discarding the movement-quality details that distinguish recovery from compensation. Automated alternatives typically chase accuracy on noisy, single-observer labels to output opaque scores - a technology-centric approach that rarely reaches clinical practice. To address this, we present xAARA: an engine designed to augment rather than replace clinical judgment. From multi-view video, xAARA returns ARAT assessments with calibrated uncertainty and explanations across task, movement-phase, and movement-quality levels. Treating clinical scoring as an ill-posed inference problem, xAARA composes 692 calibrated multimodal models via a Dynamic Bayesian Network with entropy-based gating. It qualifies results against clinical validity rules and defers low-confidence cases. In 105 stroke survivors (788 exercises), xAARA achieved 94.2% task accuracy (Cohen's kappa=0.934) and 81.3% movement-phase accuracy (kappa=0.727), reducing predictive uncertainty by 96.1% compared to single-clinician scoring. For subjective cases, it matched at least one rater 100% of the time and never returned out-of-range scores. Four independent clinicians validated the assessments and indicated willingness to adopt the system. We argue that principled uncertainty quantification and clinician-aligned explainability are the critical bridges moving automated assessment from technical demonstration to a deployable clinical tool.
Related papers
- Multi-Channel Feature Fusion and Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty-Aware Diabetic Retinopathy Grading [0.0]
Grad-CAM provides visual explanations aligned with clinically relevant lesions.<n>At a 20% referral rate, 293 of 366 images are automatically graded with a QWK of 90.40%.<n>More complex cases are referred for specialist assessment, demonstrating a practical trade-off among grading quality, automation, and patient safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-15T13:46:14Z) - Evaluating the Diagnostic Robustness of Vision-Language Models Under Visual and Textual Perturbations [3.765860543344957]
We assess the diagnostic robustness of four VLM families under evidence-preserving perturbations.<n>Our results reveal significant vulnerabilities in presentation-order stability, with models exhibiting prediction flips in up to 48.9% of cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T14:09:55Z) - Clinician-Level Agreement Without Clinical Caution: LLM Evaluator Limits in Medical AI Benchmarking [27.829988205900055]
We introduce MedQADE, the first standardised open-response clinical benchmark for German.<n>The top-performing evaluator model, Gemini 3 Flash, reached alignment consistent with the physician ceiling.<n>Despite this statistical alignment, automated evaluators exhibited near-absent clinical metacognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T15:55:31Z) - Clinical Validation of the Melanoscope AI Mobile Dermoscopy Clinical Decision Support System [0.0]
Early detection of malignant skin lesions is critical for prognosis.<n>Dermatologist shortages in Russian regions limit screening coverage.<n>Mobile dermoscopy clinical decision support systems offer a promising approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T18:29:53Z) - A Breast Vision Pathology Foundation Model for Real-world Clinical Utility [65.57568187389113]
We present bfBRAVE, a breast-adaptive pathology foundation model developed and evaluated using a total resource of 101,638 breast wholeslide images.<n>BRAVE supported practical roles in the clinical workflow, including safe exclusion of low-risk cases from routine AI-assisted second-review rescue of initially missed positives and prioritization of cases for further assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T07:44:39Z) - A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models [34.38896321208398]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare, yet existing benchmarks fail to capture model behavior under adversarial or ethically complex conditions.<n>We developed a multi-domain red teaming framework evaluating eleven contemporary LLMs across 690 clinically grounded scenarios.<n>Results revealed substantial performance variance, with mean scores ranging from 0.791 to 0.984.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T14:57:55Z) - Beyond Prompt: Fine-grained Simulation of Cognitively Impaired Standardized Patients via Stochastic Steering [58.85421622061983]
We propose StsPatient for the fine-grained simulation of cognitively impaired patients.<n>We capture domain-specific features by extracting steering vectors from contrastive pairs of instructions and responses.<n>StsPatient significantly outperforms baselines in both clinical authenticity and severity controllability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T02:37:46Z) - Benchmarking Multi-turn Medical Diagnosis: Hold, Lure, and Self-Correction [72.89352076103889]
Large language models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy in medical diagnosis when all clinical information is provided in a single turn.<n>We introduce MINT, a high-fidelity, multi-turn medical diagnosis benchmark comprising 1,035 cases.<n>We uncover three persistent behavioral patterns that significantly impact diagnostic decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T00:23:10Z) - Automated Detection of Dosing Errors in Clinical Trial Narratives: A Multi-Modal Feature Engineering Approach with LightGBM [1.0152838128195467]
We present an automated system for detecting dosing errors in unstructured clinical trial narratives.<n>Our approach combines 3,451 features spanning traditional NLP (TF-IDF, character n-grams), dense semantic embeddings, domain-specific medical patterns, and transformer-based scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T14:56:34Z) - Optimization Instability in Autonomous Agentic Workflows for Clinical Symptom Detection [3.0950658457067433]
We investigate a phenomenon in which continued autonomous improvement paradoxically degrades classifier performance.<n>We observed that validation sensitivity oscillated between 1.0 and 0.0 across iterations, with severity inversely proportional to class prevalence.<n>With selector agent oversight, the system outperformed expert-curated lexicons on brain fog detection by 331% (F1) and chest pain by 7%, despite requiring only a single natural language term as input.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T21:45:20Z) - EchoBench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Medical Large Vision-Language Models [82.43729208063468]
Recent benchmarks for medical Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) emphasize leaderboard accuracy, overlooking reliability and safety.<n>We study sycophancy -- models' tendency to uncritically echo user-provided information.<n>We introduce EchoBench, a benchmark to systematically evaluate sycophancy in medical LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T14:09:55Z) - From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations [45.414878840652115]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance on medical benchmarks.<n>However, their ability to perform medical calculations remains underexplored and poorly evaluated.<n>In this work, we revisit medical calculation evaluation with a stronger focus on clinical trustworthiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T09:10:26Z) - A Novel Attention-Augmented Wavelet YOLO System for Real-time Brain Vessel Segmentation on Transcranial Color-coded Doppler [49.03919553747297]
We propose an AI-powered, real-time CoW auto-segmentation system capable of efficiently capturing cerebral arteries.<n>No prior studies have explored AI-driven cerebrovascular segmentation using Transcranial Color-coded Doppler (TCCD)<n>The proposed AAW-YOLO demonstrated strong performance in segmenting both ipsilateral and contralateral CoW vessels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-19T14:41:22Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Deep Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis System for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip [3.216812203515066]
The clinical diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip typically involves manually measuring key radiological angles.<n>This study aims to develop an automated system that integrates these measurements to enhance the accuracy and consistency of DDH diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T19:50:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.