ASAP: Agent-System Co-Design for Wall-Clock-Centered Auto HPO Research for ML Experiments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25207v1
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:00:26 GMT
- Title: ASAP: Agent-System Co-Design for Wall-Clock-Centered Auto HPO Research for ML Experiments
- Abstract summary: We present ASAP, an agent-system co-design for HPO.<n>We show how ASAP integrates a diverse pool of inductive-biased generalizations and to select among their proposals each round.<n>We also show how ASAP re-architects the loop to reduce end-to-end wall-clock while preserving regret quality.
- Score: 45.577182866886126
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) is essential for maximizing machine learning model performance, and its core challenge is sample efficiency: finding strong configurations within a limited budget. Because every HPO tool relies on a surrogate prior that imparts its own inductive bias, individual tools struggle once problems become sufficiently diverse and drift from these priors. Motivated by the reasoning and generalization capabilities of LLMs, recent work has explored using LLMs for HPO and reports improved per-iteration performance. Yet these methods share two limitations with a common origin: they use the LLM as a single-tool replacement evaluated by iteration count. (i) Deployed in place of prior tools, the LLM is itself constrained by its pretraining objective to one family of inductive-biased proposals; this single-source setup still fails to handle the full diversity of problems. (ii) Per-iteration evaluation ignores that, in real runs, LLM inference or tool execution is paid serially on top of model evaluation every round, so iteration-count gains do not translate into end-to-end wall-clock gains. We present ASAP, an agent-system co-design that addresses both limitations. On the agent side, ASAP uses the LLM to integrate a diverse pool of inductive-biased optimizers and to select among their proposals each round. On the system side, ASAP re-architects the loop to reduce end-to-end wall-clock while preserving regret quality: a prefix-stable prompt maximizes KV-cache reuse across rounds; speculation parallelism hides the remaining LLM and tool latency under model evaluation via a relative-error accept test; and a Self-Tuner adapts the speculation threshold from execution logs off the critical path. Extensive experiments on diverse modern HPO tasks show that ASAP consistently outperforms baselines, underscoring the value of tool integration and agent-system co-design.
Related papers
- LLM-as-a-Verifier: A General-Purpose Verification Framework [74.40111651545979]
We introduce LLM-as-a-Verifier, a general-purpose verification framework.<n>It provides fine-grained feedback for agentic tasks without requiring additional training.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T17:59:35Z) - Execution-Verified Reinforcement Learning for Optimization Modeling [49.171122807323634]
Execution-verified learning framework treats a mathematical programming solver as a deterministic, interactive verifier.<n>Experiments on NL4OPT, MAMO, IndustryOR, and OptiBench across Gurobi, OR-Tools, and COPT show that EVOM matches or outperforms process-supervised SFT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T03:39:11Z) - Chimera: Latency- and Performance-Aware Multi-agent Serving for Heterogeneous LLMs [62.17306142810532]
We present Chimera, a predictive scheduling system for multi-agent workflow serving on heterogeneous LLM clusters.<n>Chime traces the best latency, reducing end-to-end latency by 1.2--2.4$times$ and improving task performance by 8.0-9.5 percentage points on average over competitive baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T17:01:42Z) - Rethinking LLM-Driven Heuristic Design: Generating Efficient and Specialized Solvers via Dynamics-Aware Optimization [21.449921296295884]
We propose Dynamics-Aware Heuristics (DASH), a framework that co-optimizes solver search mechanisms and runtime schedules guided by a convergence-aware metric.<n>DASH improves runtime efficiency by over 3 times, while surpassing the solution quality of state-of-the-art baselines across diverse problem scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T05:06:42Z) - Multi-Agent Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization [67.12841355267678]
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on multi-turn tool-integrated planning for knowledge-intensive and complex reasoning tasks.<n>Existing implementations typically rely on a single agent, but they suffer from limited context length and noisy tool responses.<n>No existing methods support effective reinforcement learning post-training of tool-integrated multi-agent frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T10:44:04Z) - Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z) - IMPROVE: Iterative Model Pipeline Refinement and Optimization Leveraging LLM Experts [28.9807389592324]
Large language model (LLM) agents have emerged as a promising solution to automate the workflow of machine learning.<n>We introduce Iterative Refinement, a novel strategy for LLM-driven ML pipeline design inspired by how human ML experts iteratively refine models.<n>By systematically updating individual components based on real training feedback, Iterative Refinement improves overall model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T01:52:37Z) - VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs [66.80143024475635]
We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.<n>Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.