Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27005v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:22:07 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)
• Abstract summary: AURORA-AI is an Adaptive Utility-driven Resource Orchestration framework for Resilient AI.<n>It unifies feedback control, Lyapunov-based stability monitoring, and a fairness-aware composite utility into a single closed-loop policy.
• Score: 3.3948742816399697
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern AI systems are increasingly deployed under non-stationary computational, demographic, and operational conditions in which static resource allocation strategies degrade both predictive performance and human-centric properties such as fairness and explainability. This paper presents AURORA-AI, an Adaptive Utility-driven Resource Orchestration framework for Resilient AI that unifies Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman feedback control, Lyapunov-based stability monitoring, and a fairness-aware composite utility into a single closed-loop policy.The framework continuously redistributes computational budget across a population of heterogeneous AI models so that the global utility, defined jointly over predictive performance, demographic parity, cost, latency, robustness, and interpretability, remains maximised under disruption. The framework is evaluated in a stress-rich discrete-time simulation that concurrently injects demographic bias shocks, gradual concept drift, and abrupt black-swan disruptions, and is compared against five established controllers including Static, Round Robin, Greedy, LinUCB, and a deep reinforcement-learning agent based on Proximal Policy Optimisation. AURORA-AI achieves immediate recovery from the black-swan event compared to eighty-eight time steps for the Static baseline and twenty-two for Proximal Policy Optimisation, lifts the alpha-quantile and the super-quantile by twenty-nine and twenty-five percent respectively, simultaneously reduces the mean and maximum demographic parity gap, and increases the fraction of Lyapunov-stable operating steps. These results indicate that fairness-aware adaptive orchestration grounded in stability theory is a practical and theoretically motivated path toward resilient human-centric AI deployment.

Related papers

• IADD-TR: Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling with Targeted Regularization for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [57.16513298507272]
  We propose IADD-TR, a unified framework combining Intervention-Aware Dynamics Decoupling (IADD) and Targeted Regularization (TR)<n>IADD factorizes transitions into an action-intervention stage and an action-free natural evolution stage, using a zero-action anchor to resolve the non-uniqueness of this two-stage factorization for robust generalization.<n>For policy learning, we derive TR from the efficient influence function of a replay-state policy-gradient functional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T08:20:02Z)
• Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization [64.95520246570446]
  We show that explicitly constraining the policy ratio variance provides a principled local approximation to trust-region constraints.<n>We introduce $bf R2bf VPO$ (Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization), which implements this constraint via a primal-dual optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T09:53:42Z)
• DeFRiS: Silo-Cooperative IoT Applications Scheduling via Decentralized Federated Reinforcement Learning [62.347535250646196]
  This paper proposes DeFRiS, a Decentralized Federated Reinforcement Learning framework for robust and scalable Silo-cooperative IoT application scheduling.<n>DeFRiS integrates three innovations: (i) an action-space-agnostic policy utilizing candidate resource scoring to enable seamless knowledge transfer across heterogeneous silos; (ii) a silo-optimized local learning mechanism combining Generalized Advantage Estimation with clipped policy updates to resolve sparse delayed reward challenges; and (iii) a Dual-Track Non-IID robust decentralized aggregation protocol leveraging gradient fingerprints for similarity-aware knowledge transfer and anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T02:02:38Z)
• HALyPO: Heterogeneous-Agent Lyapunov Policy Optimization for Human-Robot Collaboration [37.15750888195892]
  We propose heterogeneous-agent Lyapunov policy optimization (HALyPO)<n>HALyPO uses Lyapunov certification to stabilize decentralized policy learning.<n>We show that this certified stability improves generalization and robustness in collaborative corner cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T05:26:13Z)
• Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
  We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z)
• Lyapunov Stability-Aware Stackelberg Game for Low-Altitude Economy: A Control-Oriented Pruning-Based DRL Approach [37.51135101684223]
  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) serve as pivotal aerial base stations supporting diverse services from users.<n>The efficacy of such heterogeneous networks is often compromised by the conflict between limited onboard resources and stringent stability requirements.<n>We propose a Sensing-Communication-Computing-Control closed-loop framework that explicitly models the impact of communication latency on physical control stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T10:01:07Z)
• ETR: Outcome-Guided Elastic Trust Regions for Policy Optimization [6.716883192613149]
  We propose textbfElastic textbfTrust textbfETR, a dynamic mechanism that aligns optimization constraints with signal quality.<n>ETR consistently outperforms GRPO, achieving superior accuracy while effectively mitigating policy entropy degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T09:19:53Z)
• Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization for Efficient LLM Fine-tuning [48.34492357368989]
  We propose a primal-dual framework that supports stable on-policy learning and enables principled off-policy data reuse.<n>$R2VPO$ achieves superior performance with average relative gains of up to 17% over strong clipping-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:01:42Z)
• AI-Driven Cloud Resource Optimization for Multi-Cluster Environments [0.0]
  This paper presents an AI-driven framework for adaptive resource optimization in multi-cluster cloud systems.<n>The proposed approach integrates predictive learning, policy-aware decision-making, and continuous feedback.<n>A prototype implementation demonstrates improved resource efficiency, faster stabilization during workload fluctuations, and reduced performance variability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T15:15:46Z)
• BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping [69.74252624161652]
  We propose BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO)<n>BAPO dynamically adjusts clipping bounds to adaptively re-balance positive and negative contributions, preserve entropy, and stabilize RL optimization.<n>On AIME 2024 and AIME 2025 benchmarks, our 7B BAPO model surpasses open-source counterparts such as SkyWork-OR1-7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T12:55:04Z)
• Evolutionary Policy Optimization [47.30139909878251]
  On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are widely used for their strong performance and training stability, but they struggle to scale with larger batch sizes.<n>We propose Evolutionary Policy Optimization (EPO), a hybrid that combines the scalability and diversity of EAs with the performance and stability of policy gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T18:08:54Z)
• Contractive Dynamical Imitation Policies for Efficient Out-of-Sample Recovery [3.549243565065057]
  Imitation learning is a data-driven approach to learning policies from expert behavior.<n>It is prone to unreliable outcomes in out-of-sample (OOS) regions.<n>We propose a framework for learning policies modeled by contractive dynamical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T14:28:18Z)
• Reinforcement Learning under Latent Dynamics: Toward Statistical and Algorithmic Modularity [51.40558987254471]
  Real-world applications of reinforcement learning often involve environments where agents operate on complex, high-dimensional observations. This paper addresses the question of reinforcement learning under $textitgeneral$ latent dynamics from a statistical and algorithmic perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T14:22:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.