Automating Potential-based Reward Shaping with Vision Language Model Guidance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27180v1
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:45:57 GMT
- Title: Automating Potential-based Reward Shaping with Vision Language Model Guidance
- Abstract summary: We introduce the VLM-guided PBRS framework that learns the potential function directly from vision language model feedback.<n>As this approach is based on potential-based reward shaping, it preserves the original optimal policies.<n>Although the resulting preference labels are less accurate, empirical evidence shows that the preference labels can still be used to accelerate learning.
- Score: 2.8360662552057323
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Sparse rewards are inherently challenging for reinforcement learning agents as they lack intermediate feedback to guide exploration and to correctly attribute the sparse success rewards to relevant parts of the trajectory. Naive reward shaping can induce reward hacking, yielding policies that exploit auxiliary signals instead of solving the intended task. Potential-based reward shaping (PBRS) guarantees preservation of the optimal policy set, but requires the definition of a heuristic potential function over the state space. In this work, we introduce the VLM-guided PBRS framework VLM-PBRS that learns the potential function directly from vision language model (VLM) feedback. We query a lightweight VLM to obtain preferences over image pairs and train a model of the potential function using these preferences. As this approach is based on potential-based reward shaping, it preserves the original optimal policies, and removes the need for expert-designed reward shaping terms. Because large VLMs are prohibitively expensive to invoke repeatedly during policy learning, we employ smaller, more computationally efficient VLMs. Although the resulting preference labels are less accurate, empirical evidence shows that the preference labels can still be used to accelerate learning. We validate our method empirically in the Meta-World and Franka Kitchen environments and highlight the connection between VLM preference label accuracy and sample efficiency improvements. Our contributions are threefold: (1) the first application of VLM preference-based learning to synthesize a potential function for PBRS, (2) a principled, low-cost solution that leverages small VLMs, and (3) extensive empirical demonstration of improved sample efficiency and robustness to reward hacking.
Related papers
- Beyond Pairwise Feedback: Listwise Vision-Language Supervision for Preference-Based Reward Learning [0.0]
Vision-language models (VLMs) have emerged as a powerful source of supervision for reinforcement learning.<n>In this work, we introduce the first framework that combines VLM-generated preferences with the Plackett-Luce model for reward learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T04:09:21Z) - Large Reward Models: Generalizable Online Robot Reward Generation with Vision-Language Models [19.819472980239826]
We develop a robust, scalable reward model based on a state-of-the-art VLM.<n>We employ these VLM rewards to guide the model to correct sub-optimal behaviors in a closed-loop manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T02:22:16Z) - PROF: An LLM-based Reward Code Preference Optimization Framework for Offline Imitation Learning [29.373324685358753]
We propose PROF, a framework to generate and improve executable reward function codes from natural language descriptions and a single expert trajectory.<n>We also propose Reward Preference Ranking (RPR), a novel reward function quality assessment and ranking strategy without requiring environment interactions or RL training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T14:38:02Z) - Learning to Reason without External Rewards [100.27210579418562]
Training large language models (LLMs) for complex reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is effective but limited by reliance on costly, domain-specific supervision.<n>We explore Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF), a framework that enables LLMs to learn from intrinsic signals without external rewards or labeled data.<n>We propose Intuitor, an RLIF method that uses a model's own confidence, termed self-certainty, as its sole reward signal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T07:01:06Z) - Preference VLM: Leveraging VLMs for Scalable Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [17.59802090014789]
We introduce PrefVLM, a framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with selective human feedback.<n>Our method leverages VLMs to generate initial preference labels, which are then filtered to identify uncertain cases for targeted human annotation.<n> Experiments on Meta-World manipulation tasks demonstrate that PrefVLM achieves comparable or superior success rates to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T18:50:15Z) - Fine-Tuning Language Models with Reward Learning on Policy [68.70065254564642]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as an effective approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) to human preferences.
Despite its popularity, (fixed) reward models may suffer from inaccurate off-distribution.
We propose reward learning on policy (RLP), an unsupervised framework that refines a reward model using policy samples to keep it on-distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T10:02:10Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs [37.862999288331906]
We propose a framework named Code as Reward (VLM-CaR) to produce dense reward functions from pre-trained Vision-Language Models.
VLM-CaR significantly reduces the computational burden of querying the VLM directly.
We show that the dense rewards generated through our approach are very accurate across a diverse set of discrete and continuous environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T11:27:45Z) - Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output.
We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion.
Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z) - Language Reward Modulation for Pretraining Reinforcement Learning [61.76572261146311]
We propose leveraging the capabilities of LRFs as a pretraining signal for reinforcement learning.
Our VLM pretraining approach, which is a departure from previous attempts to use LRFs, can warmstart sample-efficient learning on robot manipulation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T17:37:51Z) - Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in
Vision-Language Models [76.410400238974]
We propose TTA with feedback to rectify the model output and prevent the model from becoming blindly confident.
A CLIP model is adopted as the reward model during TTA and provides feedback for the VLM.
The proposed textitreinforcement learning with CLIP feedback(RLCF) framework is highly flexible and universal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T11:03:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.