CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28397v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 05:57:42 GMT
• Title: CLOSER-VLN: Closed-Loop Self-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Aerial Vision-Language Navigation
• Abstract summary: Vision-language navigation (VLN) has recently advanced with large language and multimodal models, enabling agents to follow natural-language instructions in unseen environments without training a task-specific navigation policy.<n>Most existing VLN methods rely on an open-loop decision-execution approach, where candidate actions are generated from instructions and observations but are rarely verified or corrected before execution.<n>We propose Closed-loop Self-verified Retrieval-augmented Reasoning (CLOSER), a training-policy-free method that sequentially performs action reasoning, reliability verification, targeted retrieval, and action correction in a closed-loop manner before executing concrete
• Score: 10.221757123615786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language navigation (VLN) has recently advanced with large language and multimodal models, enabling agents to follow natural-language instructions in unseen environments without training a task-specific navigation policy. However, most existing VLN methods relying on large models still adopt an open-loop decision-execution approach, where candidate actions are generated from instructions and observations but are rarely verified or corrected before execution. This causes critical issues in aerial VLN, where minor errors in intermediate actions may quickly accumulate into large trajectory deviations and lead to target loss. To address this issue, we propose Closed-loop Self-verified Retrieval-augmented Reasoning (CLOSER), a training-policy-free method that sequentially performs action reasoning, reliability verification, targeted retrieval, and action correction in a closed-loop manner before executing concrete actions. We instantiate the CLOSER in aerial VLN tasks and develop a CLOSER-VLN framework, which is composed of three components: a hierarchical reasoner for generating candidate actions based on available information, a multidimensional action verifier for assessing the reliability of actions generated by the reasoner, and a verification-triggered multimodal retriever for retrieving targeted exemplars from a memory bank only when verification fails. We conduct experimental evaluations on the CityNav benchmark, where CLOSER-VLN achieves 32.01% SR and 21.28% SPL on the test-unseen split, confirming the effectiveness of closed-loop reasoning.

Related papers

• VerNav: Verifier-First Low-Latency Vision-and-Language Navigation [7.190348268664948]
  Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to navigate through unseen 3D environments according to natural-latency instructions.<n>We propose VerNav, a verifier-first framework for low-language LLM-based VLN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T08:45:15Z)
• ReflectVLN: Training Vision-Language Navigation Agents with Reflective Reasoning [3.003666403039533]
  ReflectVLN is an agentic VLN framework that organizes decision-making through bidirectionally interactive intention and execution agents.<n>We show that ReflectVLN improves success rates and path efficiency under a constrained data budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T12:09:33Z)
• What to Test Next: Interpretable Coverage Gap Discovery in Driving VLMs [52.50210189669399]
  Driving vision-language models (VLMs) must accurately understand scenes across diverse conditions defined by Operational Design Domains (ODDs)<n>We propose SliceScorer, a deterministic scoring rule for missing-slice recommendation.<n>We show that SliceNav surfaces high-risk coverage gaps more effectively than prior slice-discovery methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:18:01Z)
• VisualThink-VLA: Visual Intermediate Reasoning for Effective and Low-Latency Vision-Language-Action Policies [58.65913948991329]
  We present VISUALTHINK-VLA, a visual intermediate-reasoning framework for accurate, low-latency VLA policies.<n>Our bootstrapping philosophy is to guide action with effective visual thinking.<n>It bootstraps action prediction through a compact visual-evidence interface that preserves spatial precision while avoiding decoding overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T14:36:53Z)
• Pre-VLA: Preemptive Runtime Verification for Reliable Vision-Language-Action and World-Model Rollouts [18.44683570310399]
  Low-quality actions may cause physical failures during execution or lead to misleading world-model rollouts with redundant rendering costs.<n>We propose Pre-VLA, a unified runtime verification architecture that performs preemptive action assessment validity before physical execution or world-model imagination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T13:13:31Z)
• Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning with Vision-Language-Action Regularization [1.2599533416395767]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) enables high-frequency, closed-loop control for robotic manipulation.<n>Current limitations hinder their direct use in fast and precise manipulation.<n>We propose Vision-Language-Action Jump-Starting (VLAJS) to improve exploration and learning efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T11:17:54Z)
• See, Plan, Rewind: Progress-Aware Vision-Language-Action Models for Robust Robotic Manipulation [59.07792608884117]
  We introduce See, Plan, Rewind (SPR), a progress-aware vision-language-action framework.<n>SPR operates through a continuous core cycle, Seeing the current state and upcoming milestone, Planning a trajectory towards the next 2D waypoint, and Rewinding to a recoverable state upon failure.<n>SPR achieves state-of-the-art robustness with the smallest performance drop, surpassing OpenVLA-OFT and UniVLA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T07:22:51Z)
• Unleashing VLA Potentials in Autonomous Driving via Explicit Learning from Failures [14.313346858887286]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving often hit a performance plateau during Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimization.<n>This stagnation arises from exploration capabilities constrained by previous Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n>We propose Explicit Learning from Failures (ELF-VLA), a framework that augments RL with structured diagnostic feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T11:41:22Z)
• CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding [60.06899554269808]
  CycleVLA is a system that equips Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) with proactive self-correction.<n>CycleVLA achieves this by integrating a progress-aware VLA that flags critical subtask transition points.<n>Extensive experiments show that CycleVLA improves performance for both well-trained and under-trained VLAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T17:31:01Z)
• Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible [53.40183895299108]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance on a range of robotic tasks.<n>We propose Instruct-Verify-and-Act (IVA), a framework that detects when an instruction cannot be executed due to a false premise.<n>Our experiments show that IVA improves false premise detection accuracy by 97.56% over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:54:33Z)
• Active Test-time Vision-Language Navigation [60.69722522420299]
  ATENA is a test-time active learning framework that enables a practical human-robot interaction via episodic feedback on uncertain navigation outcomes.<n>In particular, ATENA learns to increase certainty in successful episodes and decrease it in failed ones, improving uncertainty calibration.<n>In addition, we propose a self-active learning strategy that enables an agent to evaluate its navigation outcomes based on confident predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T02:24:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.